Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-09 Thread alonivtsan
Don't forget RequestPolicy Continued, which controls cross-site requests: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/requestpolicy-continued/

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-08 Thread greatgnu
>I won't say that I don't trust them, its just that I like to understand what I apply. each line is commented, so you just need to read it once to know what it does.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-08 Thread greatgnu
>I am curious how you apply user.js in firefox esr 52 Copy the file in the relevant folder..?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-08 Thread delilovic
I won't say that I don't trust them, its just that I like to understand what I apply. And looking at: https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/ I would need a lot of time to understand all that. But noscript is worth to keep, thx for the input!

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-07 Thread calmstorm
I am curious how you apply user.js in firefox esr 52

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-06 Thread greatgnu
>user.js and firejail I think they are too much for my taste I'm not sure what you mean by taste, but they are both 'set and forget'. It would take you half an hour to set it, even less to forget it. On the other hand the benefits last indefinitely. cheers and push da limit o/

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-06 Thread calmstorm
Umatrix is more complicated no doubt, but I think you should look up what noscript actually is. Noscript has a crap ton of security protections, and moreover, it is usually a script blocker. You should if nothing else, use it in that mode. It really is a recommended security addon.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-06 Thread delilovic
Isn't umatrix the advanced version of noscript? Should be redundant if I make rules per site (uscript) and not globally (noscript) Kind regards

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-05 Thread calmstorm
Please use noscript, and if the blocking gets to be too much, put it in allow all globally dangerous scripts. You still get a fair amount of protection that way.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-05 Thread calmstorm
Privacy possum is like privacy badger, but way better.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-05 Thread delilovic
Well looking into user.js and firejail I think they are too much for my taste, but keep pushing the limits :D Thx and kind Regards.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-05 Thread greatgnu
I wouldn't know what would you need but I can tell I only use these addons (I really think this is more than enough when set properly): noscript umatrix httpseverywhere I also use this user.js -> https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/ I also firejail and apparmor my browser.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-04 Thread delilovic
Ok that was fast, ublock origin uses some kind of umatrix, but umatrix gives you more information. Please tell me what do I need beside umatrix, which addons would work well with umatrix? Currently I have: uMatrix HTTPS Everywhere Privacy Badger

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-04 Thread delilovic
Damn and I just got comfortably with ublock origin custom filtering :D

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-04 Thread greatgnu
I would like to grab the opportunity by the ballz and recommend umatrix -> https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix/wiki

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-03 Thread delilovic
Well I am now taking a probably radical approach, will see how long it lasts: I block everything in ublock origin and site by site I allow just what is needed to load the page... Sometimes I don't even commit (temporary allow). The thing that annoys me is that I have to every time allow

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-02 Thread g . smyli
'What is the difference between NoScript extension and disabling JavaScript in the Abrowser?' A lot of web pages have links to javascripts running from more that one domain. With NoScript you can allow scripts by domain whereas the Abrowser no javascript setting is just that, no

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-02 Thread calmstorm
Yes, Ghostery is proprietary software. The same way as WOT... and this is no joke. alas.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-02 Thread greatgnu
ghosterible is proprietary softverito :/

Re: [Trisquel-users] Abrowser recommended privacy/security extension

2018-07-01 Thread calmstorm
Noscript is a good one, Ublock origin and privacy possum are also really smart choices. Ghostery is a really, really bad idea.