Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread calmstorm

 I didn't realize that was the issue.

Okay, you have a point.

Never is it good to steer people towards proprietary crap. Even if its  
optional.


As Stallman says, optionally free is not enough.

Though in today's day and age it would be awesome just to have optionally  
free hardware. That's a far cry from what we have now.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread jason
Thanks for reporting the bug. It's # 23918 right here:  
https://trisquel.info/en/issues/23918


You should also send an email about it to report-nonf...@fsf.org and get a  
GNU Buck for your efforts signed by RMS. More information about GNU Bucks are  
at https://www.gnu.org/help/gnu-bucks.en.html




Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread jaumetbb
I know you are into Trisquel 8 final steps, and I am glad to see that you  
have this problem in mind, but Trisquel 7 has this problem. Is there a way to  
solve it? (Will any developer try to solve it).

I would try to do if I had the skills and the time (I have none, I'm afraid).


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread jason
There was a discussion of that on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list. The  
thread was "programming language package manager" if anyone wants to read it.


TL;DR: It's not any different and, to the extent that language-specific  
package managers contain non-free software, this same issue is raised and  
should be addressed. As you can see from the mailing list Guix is on it.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
> How is this any different to pip or easy_install?

As far as I know, it's not different from these, because all of those
three have external default repositories. Perhaps we have to seek help
from other free/libre system distribution projects since these patches
might be useful to all these projects.

The issue is also seen with npm. Note that I don't know if Trisquel's pip,
easy_install or npm have these issues, I only mentioned that they have
these issues by default because I already experienced this in other
distros a long time ago.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-13 Thread alonivtsan

How is this any different to pip or easy_install?


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread jason
Exactly. So this should be reported as a bug in the bug tracker against  
Trisquel 8.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread jason

Ah, I see that's already been done: https://trisquel.info/en/issues/23918

So, 'nuff said. Thanks for reporting this!


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread J.B. Nicholson

calmst...@posteo.de wrote:
Hate to break it to you all, but gdebi and dpkg can be used to install 
propietary software  also...


The issue is not whether a program can be used to install proprietary 
software. The issue is whether a program comes configured by default to 
"steer users towards obtaining any nonfree information for practical use, 
or encourage them to do so".


The Free System Distribution Guidelines at 
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html make 
this distinction:



A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining any
nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so. The
system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no specific
recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor should the
distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not committed to
only including free software; even if they only have free software
today, that may not be true tomorrow. Programs in the system should not
suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so on.


enduz...@riseup.net reported that Snap was configured by default to install 
nonfree information for practical use, such as Skype and Spotify.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread calmstorm
Hate to break it to you all, but gdebi and dpkg can be used to install  
propietary software  also...


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread mason
It works (see screenshot). Spotify and other proprietary software are also  
recommended in Gnome Software Center (see other screenshot). I reported the  
latter as a licensing issue


https://trisquel.info/en/issues/23466

months ago, but had not actually attempted installing any proprietary to see  
if it would work. Apparently it does.


Even after running

$ snap remove spotify

Gnome Software still says it's installed. When I try to remove it within  
Gnome Software I get


"Detailed errors from the package manager follow: snapd returned status code  
400: Bad Request"


Gnome Software is pretty buggy to begin with, so hopefully Spotify is indeed  
no longer installed. I may reinstall Trisquel to be safe though.


Perhaps snapd should be temporarily removed until this is issue fixed.



Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread Caleb Herbert
enduz...@riseup.net wrote ..
> I now have Spotify. All it takes 'snap install spotify'. Trisquel 8.

Wut.  Screenshot?


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread enduzzer
One only needs to install snapd, which is in the repos, and then install the  
snap. That’s it. Installing anything proprietary has never been easier than  
this. There’s Skype a few commands away. Not quite loke one would expect  
from a free libre distro.


And yes, it’s T8. I swear, untinkered.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
> I now have Spotify. All it takes 'snap install spotify'. Trisquel 8.

If your copy of SNAP really came from Trisquel 8, and you manage to
install Spotify by doing `snap install spotify' without needing to add
any other repository/store/whatever, then this installation of Spotify
*is* a bug. The bug is not the existance of SNAP.

-- 
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
  gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
  instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
  Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
  GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
  (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread enduzzer

I now have Spotify. All it takes 'snap install spotify'. Trisquel 8.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread onpon4
Snap was the bane of my existence on Ubuntu 16.04. I couldn't figure out a  
way to disable it, and Software includes Snap packages (without an option to  
turn them off), so any time I tried to find a program that way I'd be  
inundated with proprietary Snap packages.


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread enduzzer

Why does it point to Skype and Spotify, then?


Re: [Trisquel-users] SNAP, a door to non free software!

2018-03-12 Thread jason
Obviously, if snap is available in Trisquel 8, then it'll point to a place  
managed by the Trisquel project and subject to all of the same policy  
criteria:  
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html