..that you yourself
uniquely possess correctly manage theGod-thoughts of
God
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:37:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
that JC was God's
rep toyou--there ain't no wayyou mean that 'God is with
us'
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:48:23 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL
which
translatesin context, alsodualistically,to:
He is [not] God the Word
from eternity
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:26:36 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:32:04 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:09:38 -0500 "Lance Muir"
..for
him
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:46:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..that you
yourself uniquely possess correctly manage theGod-thoughts of
God
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:37:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
that JC was
God's rep toyou--there ain't no wayyou mean
myth (indeed,
evidence suggests that you're a philosopher, also not a very good one; that
there is no way the ff. is either true or biblical)
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:54:33 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:[JC] had laid aside his divinity, meaning that he had laid
aside the
are you street
preachin' these days?
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:18:12 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd:John -not to insult but I think to focus on concernment on you
part would put most of these issues at rest. If you went and asked students at
college:" what do you
,,your doctrine's
about like jt's ain't it--sorta like you are amonga couple of
pplwhose mind isthe God-thoughts of God, 'Immanuel' be
damned?
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:19:13 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
are you street
preachin' these days?
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:18:12 -0500
..Bro, do you think
DaveHs computer crashed again last night? :)
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:26:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
,,your doctrine's
about like jt's ain't it--sorta like you are amonga couple of
pplwhose mind isthe God-thoughts of God, 'Immanuel' be
damned?
On Fri,
goodnite,
Irene
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:31:14 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I may be out of commission for the next day or two.
||
words are in
context, Bro--many times the context is incomplete
humor=joke/s?
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:31:41 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd: You lost me again bro? Are you saying that you were joking
about taking the words out of context or do youview my comment on
..'the fathers hold
no authority whatsoever' is correct, Bro--e.g., the referenced fathers are the fathers
bec they recognize to a man, uncontested,that 'Jesus Christ', partic in
the writing of the Ap John is 'the Father's son'--the one Father whose
only son himself, in and through the
you candefine
humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:51:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
God bless you and give you his light in a higher way.:-)
thethought of
incarnationisremote to the writer, below--why?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:45:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You "incarnational" folk
..
..interestingly,
humor doesn't appear to be confined to the KJV
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:01:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
candefine humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:51:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
God bless you and give you his
..interestingly,
the thought of incarnation, effectively isolated below,is incarnate only
in certain folk remote to the writer
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:09:07 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thethought
of incarnationisremote to the writer,
below--why?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006
..or is it,
Bro?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:30:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..interestingly,
humor doesn't appear to be confined to the KJV
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:01:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
candefine humor, Bro--what is it?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006
..who are
they?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:48:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..interestingly,
the thought of incarnation, effectively isolated below,is incarnate only
in certain folk remote to the writer
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:09:07 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gabriel to.. a town in Galilee, to a virgin .."You will be with
child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
.The Holy Spirit will come upon you..the power of the Most High ..the
holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. .. nothing is impossible
with God."
..'and the sun
began to rain' (L Norman)
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:03:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not excuding her from fellowship, by the
way
ask an
apostle
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:19:42 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what are you saying Gary..
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:11:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gabriel to.. a town in Galilee, to a virgin .."You will be
with child and give birth to a son,
..poetically, the
experience ofNT normalcy vis a vis the Apostolic witnesses--the
status quoofthe Son of Godreigng today
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:24:16 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..'and the sun
began to rain' (L Norman)
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:03:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
myth (Scriptural
perspective is what she totallylacks equating her thought to
God's, 1:1, Bro;meaning, basically,sheenlists as
'friends'those whoallow her todominate the forumby
equation/s--this not even the moderators can do partic among truly spiritual
participants)
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006
classic/tt hall of
fame quote:
To me these other versions only add
confusion..the KJV is enough for me -- cd
||
..Iused the NASV and Amp because they were
the closest to the computer at the time.
They
say the same as the KJV because this verse (V.20) speaks of the Father rather
g:is the ff. greater
revelationbasic tomarriageadultery polygamy or pornography?
which is which?
"God [age:
unknowable ] is married to his goddess wife and has
spirit children
"The first spirit to be born in heaven was Jesus"
"God had sexual relations with Mary
this is
veryfunny Bro, esp coming from a KJV-only dude like
yourself--but i'll honestlytry to quit laughing about it, just for
you
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:14:04 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To me these other versions only add
confusion..the KJV is enough for me --
myth (doctrinal
donkey drivel)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:57:56 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Saul..after being knocked from his
donkey ..
myth
[examing
existential evidence,e.g.,]
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:54:05 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
I am not into adding or subtracting from the
Word of God..
||
for
ref:
1.
James 1:21(King
myth(as in.
e.g., Jn 8, humankindtrap get trapped in a more sophisticated
manner than raccons, Bro)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:39:35 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
In the Mountains of Western North Carolina,.. old
timers used to hunt Raccoons in a most peculiar way.
'amen' that, that
greater revelationprovides aslooo ofinnocuous
commentary
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:08:09 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AMEN to Dylan's insightful song--liked especially the part about sweatin'
. . . maybe like in the Garden of G? :)
Blainerb
In a message
street preachers
are gettin' into greater revelation, too--eh? this should encourage BB, et.
al.:)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:11:21 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||
..look past the pointing fingerin order tosee
the glory of the stars..-Bruce Lee.
||
this isn't a Rock
band?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:28:19 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Baxter Kruger..and the "dancing
trinity"
myth (mother
Mary matters, M'am)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:09:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe He is King of Kings and Lord of
Lords
Head of the Church which is His
body
Our Prophet, Priest, and King who sits at the
RH of the Father in Heaven.
||
..God
myth (evidence
suggests you are interested in re-writing it
existentially)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:19:53 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am really interested in..the
Word of God
verilysaid,
very well hedged
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:35:35 -0800 (PST) Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy.. I need to be more like you in that respect.
||
..yo, Christine,
keep in mind that greater revelationcan be reductionistic as well as
expansive
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:29:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (mother
Mary matters, M'am)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:09:41 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I believe He
BT said
this?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:53:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/8/2006 11:29:43 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine are you saying that Dylan's pointing the finger at
others is righteous?
||
..evidence suggests
that jt re-writes Luke reductionistically, in green, below
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:53:45 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..yo, Christine,
keep in mind that greater revelationcan be reductionistic as well as
expansive
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:29:06 -0700 [EMAIL
.. that she
simultaneouslyre-writes Acts 9, expansively,e.g., thereis
nodonkey in Acts--she took the liberty to add that
notion
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:00:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..evidence
suggests that jt re-writes Luke reductionistically, in green,
below
On Sun, 8
..even while she's
expansive--where expansive-ness cloaks her anti-Incarnational
reduction
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:00:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..evidence
suggests that jt re-writes Luke reductionistically, in green,
below
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:53:45 -0700 [EMAIL
..are you into
anti-Incarnational greater revelation, too?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:08:52 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..even while
she's expansive--where expansive-ness cloaks her anti-Incarnational
reduction
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:00:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..to teach
Scripture plus 'greater revelation', as below,requires deception,
ladies
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:12:41 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..are you into
anti-Incarnational greater revelation, too?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:08:52 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..even
myth ("God..giveth to all men liberally . . . " ,
but not
necessarily wisdom, Bro;
when you're
actuallyinterested in that, James says "ask")
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:18:40 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/8/2006 2:06:16 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..it's her Word
against His 'word' (KJV)
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:45:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.. that she
simultaneously re-writes James defending an erroneous notion of authority,
that her's, unlike the apostles', is of a piece with God's, a
monstrousimplication
..actually,James
also tells us Who to "ask", exclusively, Bro
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:27:43 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth ("God..giveth to all men liberally . . . " ,
but
not necessarily wisdom, Bro;
when you're
actuallyinterested in that, James says "ask")
On Sun, 8
..seems to follow
theMosaicnotion/rendering 'I am that I am'presupposg (a)
loving knowablehumanity present in (a)power beyond human[ity],
almost to the point of non-human[ity]generatingan appropriate fear
factor
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:13:19 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
three persons
..seems to follow
theMosaicnotion/rendering 'I am that I am'presupposg (a)
loving knowablehumanity present in (a)power beyond human[ity],
almost to the point of non-human[ity]producingnatural fear factor
(aborted in ignorance:)
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:13:19 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
"..when the Word of God is set before us in the Scriptures, it [is]
certainly most absurd to imagine..a fleeting evanescent voice..sent out into the
air..[partic while the apostles] tell us that the worlds were created
by the Son..who is himself the eternal and essential Word of the
ask an
apostle
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:34:34 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I certianly don't imagine anything like that .. so
what does this have to do with the price of fish?
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:25:43 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"..when the Word of God is
no one here claims
to be a swine--does he feel like onea them, too? doubtful, but, ifso, you
can tell himwe're feelg his pain chalk it up to limbaugh love,
Bro!
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:12:09 -0800 "Charles Perry Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:||
Hedoesnot claim to be an apostle..an
Well, your clock is gonna stopAt Saint
Peter's gate.Ya gonna ask him what time it is,He's gonna say, "It's too
late."Hey, hey!_I'd sure hate to be youOn that dreadful
day._
You're gonna start to sweatAnd you ain't gonna
stop.You're gonna have a nightmareAnd never wake up.Hey, hey,
hey!I'd
interestg
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 07:31:27 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[i] had the opportunity to chat with DavidM on the phone for about an
hour recently, which certainly has added immeasurably to my understanding of
him, in a personal sense. I don't see him in the same
e.g., let's say BT
(of TT)confidently commentscreatively onnecessities (also,
germane to Protestant thought, i suspect)disclosed discreetly from certain
revelation per se and all that you(two
cult-apostles like DavidM)would have to say about it is that he
(too)rejects 'greater revelation'?
..what if, perhaps.
elemental to BTs commentary, there genuinely appears to bea qualitatively
greater revelation thanyour 'greater revelation'?
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:18:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e.g., let's say
BT (of TT)confidently commentscreatively onnecessities
what Protestants would say
they need it?
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:07:00 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..Protestants ..have rejected the greater
revelation,
||
..partic while
becomgknown for rejecting papal 'greater revelation'
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:15:39 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what Protestants would
say they need it?
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:07:00 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..Protestants ..have rejected the
..whose 'revelation' is
'greater'--Pope
Juliusor JSs?
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:23:15 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..partic while
becomgknown for rejecting papal 'greater
revelation'
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:15:39 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what Protestants would
..how about Leoor JP2's--can you
see Protestants rejectgtheir authority inc the authority oftheir
'greater revelation'but acceptg someone else's relatively innocuous
commentary?
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:34:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..whose 'revelation' is
'greater'--Pope
..among corrupt
authority/s rejected by Protestants one mayinclude Hitler's, too--Nazis
were not Protestants even thoughmany Protestantsbecame Nazi/s--a
brute fact whichrelates directly to (true, bothcontemporary
historic,) Protestants consistently rejecting 'greater
revelation'
On Wed,
myth(jt's doctrinal
demands*contortmythological god-men:men of
godlinessbirthed fromhergod of
manliness)
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:52:33 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:The only
value of [jt] doctrine is to produce godliness
--
*
"JESUS came to this planet as the Son of God
myth ("For I have come down
from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent
me.")
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:04:52 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:Jesus.. went TO the cross of his own will and
doctrine.
myth
(ultimately God's doctrine is God's)
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:28:23 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:the
doctrine of Christ was not ultimately his own
cult-apostolic
myth ("For I have come down from
heaven..do the will of him who sent me.")
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:04:52 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:Jesus.. went TO the cross of his own will
..
"..I have come down from heaven..
thx
..CPL was working
on this same case from a different angletoday--death/resurrection as sides
of JCs NT coin
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:10:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:53:01 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I write down that Judy T denies the deity
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 01:18:55 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..she..cut[s] and insult[s ppl]
jd
DavidM:
..Izzy properly defines [limbaugh]love
here
..yes,
ladies gentlemen, while evidence suggests that both views,
below,are v true, roll Ohio!
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:37:28 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 01:18:55 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..she..cut[s] and insult[s ppl]
jd
!!News Flash :: Davidic update
prolepsisfrom the projected'combat
zone'!!
"..I pursued my enemies and crushed them;
I did not turn back till they were destroyed.
I crushed them completely, and they could not rise;
they fell beneath my feet.
You armed me with strength for battle;
you made
therefore, it's
exclusively eternallyentirely rootedsolely inJCs
extantword/s
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 22:11:02 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the entire NT was written subsequent
to[JCs] utterance
myth
(impossible--interpretation of 'pB rev'produces pB commentary, not pB
truth)
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 22:55:42 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
post Biblical revelations
have made interpreting the
Bible..easier.
and this why
cultic-apostolic problem solvingis lucrative
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:31:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whoa -- next Perry tells us to "cool it," maybe, just maybe,
we should listen.
You're freakin us out, Perry.
jd :-)
--
Original
..for
them
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:16:37 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and this why
cultic-apostolic problem solvingis lucrative
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:31:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whoa -- next Perry tells us to "cool it," maybe, just
maybe, we should listen.
myth (someone
manufactured this explanation--Izzy citedother mythological
reasons)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:03:57 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:Someone breaks the ad hominem rule ..and Izzy is so upset
by it that she wants to leave the list,
in context, the
essence of current compound/ed cultic-apostolic myth:
"..I have been
wasting my time throwing pearls before swine here." --
Izzy
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:17:52 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (someone
manufactured this explanation--Izzy citedother mythological
..cultic-apostolic
theory rules from the right of the right
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:31:58 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in context, the
essence of current compound/ed cultic-apostolic myth:
"..I have been
wasting my time throwing pearls before swine here." --
Izzy
On
..whoever
intelligently disagrees is left
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:46:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..cultic-apostolic theory rules from the right of the
right
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:31:58 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in context, the
essence of current compound/ed
"..I have been
wasting my time throwing pearls before swine here." --
Izzy
myth ("I have been wasting my time throwing
pearls before swine here")
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:03:57 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:"Izzy has
more love flowing through her little pinky finger at this very moment than most
people will ever experience in their whole lifetime on
..ftr, Mormanizm is
right:)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:55:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..whoever
intelligently disagrees is left
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:46:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..cultic-apostolic theory rules from the right of the
right
On Sat,
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:06:13 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"I have been wasting my time
throwing pearls before swine here"..
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:03:57 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:"Izzy
has more [limbaugh]love flowing through her little pinky
finger at
"Izzy has more [limbaugh]love flowing through her little pinky
finger at this very moment than most people will ever experience in their
whole lifetime on earth."
"..[partic while] a .50 caliber round into the heart of
somebody you don't even know is the essence of yourfeminine
right, somewhere
therein :)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:45:17 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And therein is its limitation. Right?
jd
--
Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..cultic-apostolic theory rules from the right of the
right
yes, its clear,
Bro, rightizm iz like Naziism
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:58:40 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..Of course Mormanizm is right...that's why I feel so
comfortable..amongst friends who are left of right...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..ftr,
acc to the NT, how
many wives didMary's husbandown?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:09:41 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
his 14-year old mother, MaryDAVEH:
Is it commonly believed by many Christians that Mary was only 14 when she gave
birth to our Savior?ShieldsFamily wrote:
...loyally snipin'
some of uswith machine guns
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:10:49 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes, its clear,
Bro, rightizm iz like Naziism
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:58:40 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..Of course Mormanizm is right...that's
..Naziism started
in the German labor movement--Hitler, with his certainJS-like
qualitieswas firsta labor/er's
philosopher-politico
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:10:49 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes, its clear,
Bro, rightizm iz like Naziism
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:58:40 -0800 Dave
..and
why?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:16:19 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
acc to the NT,
how many wives didMary's husbandown?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:09:41 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
his 14-year old mother, MaryDAVEH:
Is it commonly believed by many Christians that
..then they said
they got right with the lord--check out their propaganda,
too
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:24:21 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Naziism started
in the German labor movement--Hitler, with his certainJS-like
qualitieswas firsta labor/er's
philosopher-politico
On
to bad he didn't
pursue that option
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:58:14 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Given a chance to become Mormon, I suspect
Hitler would feel more comfortable remaining a Protestant.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..Naziism
started in the German
you're realizg
certain critiquesgotta befocusd--eh?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:05:54 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes, its
clear, BroDAVEH: Seems only to be
clear to those who are myopic, IMO. Nice play on
words, G.I'm sure iz would be rightly proud of you!
;-) ||
..(your) evidence
suggests that Mormanism lacks focus--partic, disparages, manipulates the NT,
particagainst Protestants
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:14:02 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you're realizg
certain critiquesgotta befocusd--eh?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:05:54 -0800 Dave [EMAIL
even untwisted
history can't fathom THAT, let aloneWHY Hitler could form a formal state
church/alliance with the German Catholics under theregime of Pius XII;
regardless, there's a v famous, then contemporary pic ofPius XIIs
Reichs-Bishop among Nazis saluting Hitler at a cathedral in
not really,
Bro--few here think this way butyou--many of your opinions take shape
around (proven) misinformation, at best
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:35:11 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: It does seem the obvious conclusion, even if it weren't my
opinion.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...ftr,some
theoretically murderous,undoubtedly manipulative Catholicsare trying
to shed the imagery cited,below, of Pius XIIs regime,to be able
tobeatify Pius XII now
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:18:46 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Protestants
like Dietrich Bonhoeffer, whom many
..Protestants like
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, whom many now respect even more in retrospect, were
intelligently 'civil disobedient' even unto death in those days; also,in
our day anti-warmovements don't phase Mormans whose officials,
liketypical cult-apostolic politiciansHitler-esque wannabe
Pastor, what do you
thinkDaveH means by this word "Protestants"?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:55:37 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the Mormon rhetoric
"Protestants"
'answers'--eh?
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:24:38 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can almost hear Terry saying, "save the women and children
!!"
Perhaps we need to humor the one who is the maker of bats !!!
jd
--
Original message -- From: Terry
let's keep Thinkin'
Thoughtfully..what(will) certainppl(will)
disclose(?)(.)
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:54:27 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If truth be told, info from the hearing of flies on the wall would
reveal that "protestant" is a word used by the Mormon faithful as they
speak
not
really--actually, i think believingGodis no man's brain
child,Bro
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:10:29 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Seems like the box is confining your thinking,
G.||
interestingly, both
statements are true, else there's no way to account for (the) Bonhoeffer(/s},
Bro
..Nazisain't
Protestant
||
Many Protestants [became] Nazi[s].
that
boxRocks, Bro;can you lie your way out of it?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:37:52 -0800 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Protestant[Christianity] has piqued my
curiosity.
myth (e.g.,
evidence shows that you'verevise/d the meaning of the book of James
toaccommodate your private doctrinal demands)
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:33:23 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take care not to add words or meaning to the words
of scripture,
||
301 - 400 of 2156 matches
Mail list logo
