on some
perceptions too, probably because my historical studies differ from her's.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 5:15 AM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
- Original Message
: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Lance Muir' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 22, 2006 09:36
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 13:57
Subject: RE: Fw: Continuing repentance
I understand what he is saying about the one-time turn, but
I don't think this is what Victor/Luther meant. They mean something more like
that funny
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: February 21, 2006 14:23
Subject: FW: Fw: Continuing repentance
In other words, David does not seem to have taken the
point about penance and our modern psychological equivalent.
And probably both views of repentance
interpretation of Luther rather than toward
Luther himself.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:54 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
IMO, 'opting for' is good.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 22, 2006 08:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
We are indeed dealing with a difference in how terms are defined. More
than
Penance has nothing to do with anything Lance, nor does
quote "our modern psychological equivalent"
They are both a moot point because they
aredifferent from repentance. Your friend is too far out
there.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:54:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-
: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw:
Continuing repentance
Penance has nothing to do with anything Lance, nor
does quote "our modern psychological equivalent"
They are both a moot point because they
aredifferent from repentance. Your friend is too far out
there.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:5
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Lance Muir' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 22, 2006 09:36
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fw: Continuing repentance
What David says about Luther's theses interests me from a discourse point
of
view. Difficult
9 matches
Mail list logo
