In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:10:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have a difference of opinion here. I consider this teaching to be a
doctrine of demons. I do not say this to evoke an emotional outburst from
you or anyone else. I speak this soberly and prophetically.
That would make you a false prophet, in my book. But,
again, what does either opinion have to do with the discussion at
hand. NOTHING. Yet you call this a disscussion
group and nothing more. Why you insist on this kind of childishness
is beyond me.
Id describe it as a room full of
In a message dated 1/29/2005 9:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Id describe it as a room full of backbiterscertainly not kind friends. I wouldnt attend a party like this. Izzy
You attend one everyday and have more to say negatively than any one on the forum, if you
d describe it as a room full of backbiterscertainly not
kind friends. I wouldnt attend a party like this. Izzy
You attend one everyday and have more to say negatively than any one on the
forum, if you consider ratio analysis comparing number of words written to
number of negatives
John wrote:
Your views and mine, if true, come to us
FROM OTHERS. There is no escaping
this reality.
We have a difference of opinion here. I consider this teaching to be a
doctrine of demons. I do not say this to evoke an emotional outburst from
you or anyone else. I speak this soberly
have expected a Thus saith the Lord or something
similar, you know, something less opened to confusion? Anyway, FWIW --
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sources
-
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 20, 2004 19:17
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Sources of Truth
David Miller wrote:
THE BIBLE IS TRUE
Lance wrote:
Because of what you may be meaning when you write
this, I'd like some clarification.
I believe
Lance wrote:
... (what of) disagreements that are not overcome
merely by appeal to the Holy Scriptures.
... APPEAL MUST BE MADE BEYOND ALL ECCLESIASTICAL
AUTHORITY OR BIBLICAL CITATION TO THE truth of God
for that is the supreme authority to which all must
submit and on which everyone
]
Sent: April 21, 2004 08:52
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Sources of Truth
Lance wrote:
... (what of) disagreements that are not overcome
merely by appeal to the Holy Scriptures.
... APPEAL MUST BE MADE BEYOND ALL ECCLESIASTICAL
AUTHORITY OR BIBLICAL CITATION TO THE truth of God
Lance wrote:
David: You've framed this as a have you stopped
beating your wife question.
I did? I fail to see that, so I must have really misunderstood you.
Lance wrote:
My answer is yes. You've mischaracterized
most of the rest of it.
Sorry.
Lance wrote:
Perhaps someone with more
David Miller wrote:
THE BIBLE IS TRUE
Lance wrote:
Because of what you may be meaning when you write
this, I'd like some clarification.
I believe that the Bible is God's Word and leads us to truth. I'm not
sure what kind of clarification you are looking for.
Peace be with you.
David
every exchange taking place on this site.Blessings, Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 17, 2004 09:22
Subject: [TruthTalk] Sources of Truth
David Miller wrote:
We also should not assume that all knowledge and
truth
David Miller wrote:
We also should not assume that all knowledge and
truth is meant to come through the Bible.
Lance wrote:
David, please say the same thing in different
words so as to clarify your meaning.
The Bible is true, but it is only one witness to truth. Knowledge and
truth can be
13 matches
Mail list logo
