From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I said I like
looking for our Lord in all the "wrong" places. It doesn't surprise me to find
him working in strongholds normally given to the other side. Jesus madeit
hiscareer doing this.
jt said How did
Jesus make his career looking for God in all
A preacher said our ( 60's ) generation had no morals. This generation is without a conscienceCharles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John, you may wish to review the following book:"The Vanishing Conscience", by John F. McArthur, Jr. Word Publishing. 1994.From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:
Judy,
I do not know if you are aware of this, so I won't
call your behavior devious and your arguments intellectually dishonest. Instead
I will give you the benefit of doubt and simply point out that you are
committing an age-old fallacy in several of your rebuttals. The fallacy is
called
Thanks Izzy. I agree with you.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:20
PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] All truth leads to
Jesus.
Hey
Bill,
I had to drop in to
say that I agree with your
The interpretation that the "other sheep" are jews in America is spelled out in 3 Nephi 15. It is not to be found in the Holy Bible. The time of the alleged account is AD34 in a visit to the "Nephite" people
NOT JUST A SELECT FEW
Acts 2:36 Therefore let ALL the house of Israel know assuredly,
If you like looking for him in all the wrong places, how about checking him out or his truth at a Witches Coven?
If you did not say he is in it, are you refering to his truth in it?
So what is so great about Paloneys contribution to Christianity? Was he a christian in more than name only?
What
Jesus picked Judas, would you have Judas as your preacher?
Just pick out the bones?"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Izzy. I agree with you.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk]
Well, what do you think, Kevin?
Bill Taylor
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:38
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] All truth leads
to Jesus.
Jesus picked Judas, would you have Judas as your
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9049690%255E13762,00.html
Minister dies watching Jesus movieFrom correspondents in Rio De JaneiroMarch 23, 2004
A BRAZILIAN pastor died of a sudden heart attack while watching Mel Gibson's controversial film "The Passion of The Christ," church
For some it is the Grateful Dead, for others it was Van Halen!
Were these guys doing acid?"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read my Polanyi post and get back to me.
As far as a "Witches Coven" I don't know. I've not been to one. But a very good friend of mine was hallucinating at a
I think not. The point is why go to a place where you must pick throughthe trash to get at the meat, when you can go Boldly to the One who is truth? Why not point people directly to the Truth (John "thy word IS Truth") rather than a secondary source? Some might swallow a bone."Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL
What evidence exists that Polanyi was a Christian?Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you like looking for him in all the wrong places, how about checking him out or his truth at a Witches Coven?
If you did not say he is in it, are you refering to his truth in it?
So what is so great about
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:04:37 -0800 "Charles
Perry Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G, I think you
got your message across to them...[one] would
think this is a chat
room.
chat's cool, too,Mr.
Moderator; as well as the other traditional TT mode/s (inc
'Digest'),partic if it's time worthy
Wow! Bill, that was a fantastic read. Thank you for taking the time to write it.
I have often taught that words only approximate truth and can never really explain
truth precisely. The greatest truths remain a mystery when expressed in any language.
I came to this understanding by a
Vince wrote:
No offense, but this seems to fall into the category
of what many call psychobabble. I guess my brain is
just not suited to philosophy.
Everyone's brain is suited to understand the things discussed in Bill's
post. The problem is that some background for the relevance of what is
In a message dated 3/23/2004 5:38:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you like looking for him in all the wrong places, how about checking him out or his truth at a Witches Coven?
I really don't intend to get involved in this discussion BUT it is obvious to me that
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:24:04 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I came to..understanding by a revelation
concerning 1 Cor. 2:6-7...[in which] there
is much overlap.. with what you
shared about Polanyi. The terms explicit knowledge
and tacit knowledge will
certainly help me
FTR, Mr. Moderator;one may correctlysuspect that DavidM
just went to the opposite extreme--from the comments, below--i.e., didn't he
actually embrace (with Bill)Polanyi as a Gospel-guru of some sort; I'm in
favor of lets at least let'em try toprove it..(eh, Iz?I'm
wonderin'..when are you
Kevin,
I don't know about Van Halen, but my friend was
tripping on acid, yes. When he saw the blond haired big man coming toward him he
fell to his knees and started begging the Lord's forgiveness. Everyone around
him was standing, so he stayed on his knees and crawled through the crowd,
Kevin,
My experience is that many are not prepared to
recognize the meet. They've been raised on bones and hate the meet. Sometimes
it's necessary to start them out on pabulum (I don't know if I spelled that
right); you know, something they can digest, something there stomach is used to.
His own testimonial as relayed through several of
his close friends. His own words in his book entitled Meaning. The very
fact that he walked away from a very proud heritage both in Judaism and later in
the arena of Science to become a participating member of a Christian Church. Is
that
Yes.
Theology is more like math than science; you start with an
assumption or set of assumptions, regardless of how much they do or do
not seem to reflect a real-world situation, then you derive conclusions
from those assumptions. (The final conclusions drawn by theologians can
be
G says I
sincerely doubt that (e.g.) Judy or yourself or DavidMwanna be chastised
for rejectingsomenovice's rhetorical philosophical spoon
feeding.
That's very considerate of you, G. Perhaps you are
right. Would you please teach me about Polanyi, about philosophy in general,
that I might
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:33:29 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:(The final conclusions drawn by theologians
[about 'science' and/or magic, as in
(e.g.) the
case of the OT's Daniel]can be checked for
validity by comparing them with truth as
presented by God in the
bible.)
(and when you do
post/critiquethe
novice'salleged UCBerkely, c. 1962, Polanyi, document/s; otherwise, my
comments to 'elextech' (vince) are your's to trash, if you wanna risk
it
G ~ P
235
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:51:30 -0700 "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G says I
sincerely doubt that (e.g.)
Blaine: The following from the Book of
Mormon--submitted by Kevin, thank you Kevin--sounds well-reasoned and
plausible. I find it far more believable than the tortuous explanation
Kevin gives trying to convince us Jesus was referring to the GENTILES when he
said "OTHER SHEEP I HAVE WHICH
\o/ !HALALUYah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless NameofYahShua!!
My assertion re Se is
true; refreshing that you are not saying it isn't.
My piece was a NEWSY
response to NEWS REPORTS giving answer in the same fashion. It was not
intended for publication in JAMA (Journal of the
Blaine: You used the word,
"hallucinating." Was thisfriend a frequent hallucinator? How
old was he? Peoplewith hereditary schizophrenia have both visual and
auditory hallucinations frequently, usually starting in the late teens or early
twenties--prior to that, they most often seem quite
Once again I find myself thanking you, David, for
the encouraging words. They are much needed and appreciated. Perhaps the other
Polanyi aquainties, I'm thinking primarily of Lance, but G seems to be one as
well, will disagree with me, but the book to read firstis Personal
Knowledge
Blaine,
Just a reminder that there is a challenge on the table for you to present
one provable, or proven, fact from the BoM that did not come from the Bible.
Maybe you have not gotten to it yet in your catching up on TT posts.
Perry
From: Blaine Borrowman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Hey, Blaine, No problem -- it's not my
story. I'm just telling it like I heard it. I happen to know this kid quite well
and believe he's telling it like he saw it }:)but beyond that, you'll
have to decide. As far as being schizophrenic, I happen to know that he has not
been diagnosed as
John, Funny you would bring up GlasserI
stumbled upon his theories in nursing school, and he made more sense than all
the others put together. He acted as if there was no such thing as insanity
and treated the patients as if they were capable of behaving normally, and they
often did
hey Layman--is this how you were
taught, too? What does it have to do with Scripture? G
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 .."Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..why not let the Lord work in
mysterious ways and us marvel at his majesty?
and
"Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris, Thanks for the additional feedback.
Why do you think men have a much lower incidence of breast cancerdo they
have higher levels of selenium? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Barr
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 7:29
PM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks, John. Welcome Back. And you geta
smiley face {:)
Hey, you mentioned an interest in conscience
theory, and you expressed your opposition to secular psychology. Do you have Ed
Bulkley, Why Christians Can't Trust Psychology (Eugene, OR: Harvest
House, 1993)? Bulkley was a prof of
hmmm..
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:24:04 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I came to..understanding by a
revelation concerning 1 Cor. 2:6-7...[in which] there
is much overlap.. with what you
shared about Polanyi. The terms explicit knowledge
and tacit knowledge
G, you would have to understand not only "subjectivism" but also
the Lordship of Christ to understand why your "but" doesn't get it.
Bill
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 .."Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes to BB:
..why not let the Lord work in
mysterious ways and us marvel at
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:05:37
-0700 "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[re: someone
misunderstanding]"subjectivism"
how so?
it'sunfathomable where the
misunderstanding could be, Bill, e.g.:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004.. "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I find myself thanking
Polanyi doesn't teach subjectivity, G. That's the
point. You would have to know him to know that. Why are you so upset? What's
troubling you, really.
Bill Taylor
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:16
G,
I am tired of this conversation. I do not see how
anything good can come from it. I would appreciate it if you would not respond
to me any further. I will show the same courtesy to you.
Thank you,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Wm. Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
