No one's talking about "thought police," Kev. If you want to talk like Hill and North - expect the rest of us who listen to you to think you are of the same ilk, denials not withstanding. That's all I am saying.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL
http://www.avpress.com/n/23/0323_s3.hts
Board OKs Darwin challenge
By CHRISTOPHER AMICO
Valley Press Staff Writer
LANCASTER - The Lancaster School District board of trustees voted to
implement a philosophy of science instruction that encourages
students to question Charles Darwin's theory of
That wasn't the question; I asked whether IF you believe it were true, you
would want it taught in schools. You said NO. Pathetic, eh? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:49 PM
To:
Are you aware that it was a Christian who
discovered the fallacy of that belief?
Galileo Galilei, though famous for his scientific achievements in
astronomy, mathematics, and physics and infamous for his controversy with the
church was, in fact, a devout Christian who saw not a divorce
Exactly right that Horace Mann introduced
humanism in place of Christianity in the public education system. Until him
the Bible was the basic textbook. izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Miller
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 9:56
AM
To:
Mann instituted public education as an alternative to the existing private and religious system of the day. That is what I am talking about. What the Puritans did in the 1600's is NOT what I am talking about. I am telling you that public education started in Mass. as a reaction to "religious" and
It ain't true. It's a hyperbolic hypothetical, Iz.
.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006 17:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
That wasn't the question; I asked whether IF you believe it
But then you don't really know that upon which we focus
do you Lance?
I for one do not take on responsibility for every
decision made by the US Gov't, Congress, Senate, and GWB
and I have released ourchildren to run their own
lives.I've discovered a funny thing Lance; you know the only
one I
There is no such thing as a "renovated" heart Lance;
more misunderstanding which makes me wonder
about you and your SS conversion. It is a new
heart; the old has passed away - all things become new.
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:06:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My critique of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do I believe about Genesis? Did you read any of my posts?
Sciencehas no answers to our confusion, our bondage, our need for community andan innate longing to live beyond what we see.As soon as we turn Genesis into a statement of science, we lessen its value to
:-) I shall miss these pithy responses.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After reading you, I'm inclined toward a YES!
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006 06:35
Subject:
If I am talking like Hill North it must be a typo or More Likely a Parity Error on your end![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:No one's talking about "thought police," Kev. If you want to talk like Hill and North - expect the rest of us who listen to you to think you are of the same ilk, denials not
It goes beyond taking responsibility Judy. You have been accussed of having the same murderous spiritas that bunch of Dominionists and Reformed Papists!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But then you don't really know that upon which we focus do you Lance? I for one do not take on
David, allow me this moment to reveal just a tad about the Smithmeister. Bulldogery is that which speaks of my passion. Indeed, I have gotten angry twice, here on TT, both times following one of your priceless comments . Twice in three years (going back a ways .)?!! Not bad, I think.
I am
Can't makethe old man act new, anymore than you can make aMannequin dance Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no such thing as a "renovated" heart Lance; more misunderstanding which makes me wonder about you and your SS conversion. It is a new heart; the old has passed away - all
actually, that is not true. But go with it !! Who cares.
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It goes beyond taking responsibility Judy.
You have been accussed of having the same murderous spiritas that bunch of Dominionists and Reformed
I was responding to this jewel: violent thinking is not violent action And who gets elected to be the thought police anyway?
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I am talking like Hill North it must be a typo or More Likely a Parity Error on
The Lack of understanding is just laziness of thought and lack of effort. Fits the legal definition of LibelJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just one more example which proves the fact that you have not ever understood what any of us have been saying. Not really. I know I am not into
Exact - a - mundo !!
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't makethe old man act new, anymore than you can make aMannequin dance Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such thing as a "renovated" heart Lance; more misunderstanding
Sofile a claim ! Or are you afraid the judge might not see it as libel ?!!
(I am there with the humor -- have I hurt your feelings yet?)
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Lack of understanding is just laziness of thought and lack of effort.
PTL Lance finally found it[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:actually, that is not true. But go with it !! Who cares.-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] It goes beyond taking responsibility Judy. You have been accussed of having the same
Are you trying? Why would my feelings be hurt?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Sofile a claim ! Or are you afraid the judge might not see it as libel ?!! (I am there with the humor -- have I hurt your feelings yet?) -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then Truth ain't
JC
put yet another
way, the notionmouthedisbeyond falseness, it is implicitly
untrue as is a lie,M'am
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:05:59 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As..we turn Genesis into a statement...
jt:
..it's 'a statement of
TRUTH'
v insightful,
Bro
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:33:06 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Get/[like
allow] the educator to admit that his world of knowing is not
that much different than the
Christian's and you have common ground with which to
discuss.
bullseye; v
understandable, Bro!
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:30:28 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Fits the legal definition of LibelJudy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||
..you are out there Lance, possiblyin the
next orbit to Gary.
..also,perceptively:
"The Lack of understanding
is just laziness of thought and lack of effort."
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:23:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bullseye; v
understandable, Bro!
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:30:28 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Just quoting your words while mocking Lance --
And your comments on "FUNDIES" have hurt me, kd
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you trying?
Why would my feelings be hurt?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sofile a claim ! Or are you afraid the
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
