ShieldsFamily wrote:
Jt, also I
have learned that when a
certain mormon fellow (to remain unnamed) asks us to define anything it
is to
get us squabbling about definitions amongst ourselves;
DAVEH: ??? Are you suggesting I'm the author of confusion in this
Forum? While
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005
12:14 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
In a message dated 1/14/2005 9:21:00 PM
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Jt, also I have learned that when a certain
mormon fellow (to remain unnamed) asks us to define anything it is to get us
squabbling about definitions amongst ourselves;
DAVEH: ??? Are you suggesting I'm
the author of confusion in this Forum? While I may wish I
In a message dated 1/15/2005 4:34:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Soo, John got the word wrong? You have a grammatical reason for saying this? You have a reason at all for saying this? Seriously. I see no reason for the need on your part to 1) disagree with what
Actually, two very
different theologies are presented here. Cleanses us from
sin is a statment that declares pardon for what we do by default (sort
of) as we grow and mature in the Lord's will. Cleanses
us from sinning, besides changing the gk from a noun to a verb, allows one
to think
In a message dated 1/15/2005 12:45:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for clarifying your opinion. I respectfully disagree. Izzy
I love the "respectfully" part. Seriously.
Jd
DA Smithsonwrites:What if I said that "free moral agency" is a
problem for God -- who is not
a free moral agent;
that His "all knowing" acclaim (a
claim heeped on Him by others) is a comparative
statement, His knowledge
compared to our meager
share;
No doubt you've been
His
new uniform is not one I would choose to wear!
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Gary D
OttosonSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 20.45To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in
In a message dated 1/14/2005 12:27:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DA Smithson writes:
What if I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God -- who is not a free moral agent;
that His "all knowing" acclaim (a claim heeped on Him by others) is a
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:26:52 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DA Smithson writes:What if I said
that "free moral agency" is a problem for God
-- who is not a free moral
agent; that His "all knowing" acclaim (a
claim heeped on Him by others) is a
In a message dated 1/14/2005 2:36:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: Romans 2:15,16 speaks of born again Gentiles that is people who were not raised under the law of Moses but who now "in Christ" do by nature (their new nature) the things required in the law with their
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:44:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fact that He changes His mind indicates His mercy, it does not detract from his Omnipotence.
Omnipotence -- doesn' t that have to do with power?
John
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:44:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But according to your belief He must be on this learning curve to have no limitations?
I pretty much believe the learning curve was centered around our creation -- humans -- with larger degree of "free
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:53:21 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/14/2005 8:44:06 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:But
according to your belief He must be on this learning curve to have no
limitations?
I pretty much believe the
learning curve
In a message dated 1/14/2005 4:55:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, judyT writes:
"Where were you when he layed the foundations of the world - declare if you
have understanding?"
I believe I was in Compton.
John
In a message dated 1/14/2005 5:37:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: Can't agree with you John because the word Life in Gk is Zoe or divine life rather than sarx or flesh life.
Judy, you might dig up a good lexicon. You will change your mind on the above. "Zoe" is a work
When we might say, walking in the light is a relatively
sinless state -- the question is almost forced upon
us, Well, then, why the cleansing from sin in the same verse,
in the same breath?
John
Because cleansing
us from all sin means cleansing us from all sinning. Izzy
In a message dated 1/14/2005 9:21:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we might say, "walking in the light is a relatively sinless state" -- the question is almost forced upon us, "Well, then, why the cleansing from sin" in the same verse, in the same breath?
John
morehermeneuticlesspoliticizdrivel
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:14:23 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/14/2005 9:21:00 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Because cleansing us from all
sin means cleansing us from all sinning.
Izzy
John my understanding is that walking in the light and
having fellowship with Jesus implies repentance and
departure from sin rather
than some continuous flow of blood. Also I can't see how this makes the
sacrifice
static. In the gospel
of John we are told that the world (outside of Christ)
The
below is something I definitely did not write. Please pay no attention to the
intro line, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:21
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
Nah...it was written by Izzy...in response to Bill
Taylor
Bill it appears to me
that your theological construct forces one to believe that the worst thing you
could do is to tell someone about Jesus Christ. If they never hear about
Jesus they are guaranteed a ticket to heaven. If
Thank
you, Bill. I don't think I'll pursue the 'negative-option marketing' plan just
now. It is not a good way of putting it. I am the slow one--I think slowly, and
communicate slowly, and when I rush I get it wrong.
I am
trying to work out all of what the Trinitarian position means. I
In a message dated 1/12/2005 8:42:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the mind is the home of faith which is wrong.
And for this you decided the guy was hell bound? Get a grip. The mind and where it places it's interests is used by Paul to define that which is spiritual and
In a message dated 1/12/2005 9:27:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, there is that problem if you press it to the logical conclusion, isn't there? Same with the all-babies-go-to-heaven view. In that case, best kill your kid before s/he reaches the age of accountability,
Debbie, I hear you. We dont
have to have it all figured out thankfully. We just have to
trust and obey a loving God. BTW, I love the song Maybe Theres
a Loving God by Sara Grovesits so awesome. (Im
playing it on the computer as I type.) Izzy
In a message dated 1/12/2005 10:07:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debbie wrote When I said God sees the end from the beginning, I didn't mean foreknowledge. I meant that the person's whole life-direction is one. And by that I meant, if they reject the message after
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
9:02 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Bill it appears to me that your
theological
In a message dated 1/12/2005 10:57:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is it that whenever some TTers cannot agree on certain (usually non-essential) points of theology, instead of plainly explaining their position and then letting it go at that, they instead resort to
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You
caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the
sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has saved
everyone else,believers included.We do not need a
second gospel to get
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
10:21 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
In a message dated 1/12/2005 7:48:06 PM
That's perfectly fine, Debbie. I think (if I may
take a little license with what you wrote) that a lot of the misunderstandings
come in via the door of missed opportunities, and I mean on the part of the
Trinitarians, to fully answer questions when asked. I am fairly confident that
most
I would say -- "How about them Dodgers?"
Bill :)
What if
I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God
-- who is not a free moral agent; that His "all
knowing" acclaim (a claim heeped on Him by others) is a comparative
statement, His knowledge compared to our
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:10:22 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a
message dated 1/12/2005 8:42:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
the mind is the home of faith
which is wrong.
And for this you decided
the guy was hell bound? Get a grip.
jt:
Now that you've vented, please go back and reread
what I've written.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 7:47
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
9:47 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Now that you've vented, please go back and
Yeah, Izzy, I know. At that point I was just
beginning to brew. The pot boiled later on -- poor Debbie!I think that
your answer is a practical-outworking part of the full answer, but it
does not address the theological 'whys' of this issue. Like why were those
babies even alive in the first
Exactly. Iron sharpens iron.
(And mud muddies the muddled?) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
7:56 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Excuse me, Judy, for what do I need to repent? At
the time this took place you apologized to me for your accusation and admitted
that you had judged him without first understanding his position. Are you now
taking that back and turning on me? I am at a loss to know how to take you. You
jt: Bill if I apologized to you back then it may have
been for misunderstanding Newbigin, it certainly wasn't
for consigning him to hell which was your accusation
yesterday and which incidentally John has picked up on.
Amazing how bad news spreads. I am not turning on
you, nor am I reframing
Yeah, Izzy, I know. At that point I was just beginning to
brew. The pot boiled later on -- poor Debbie!I think that your answer is
a practical-outworking part of the full answer, but it does not address
the theological 'whys' of this issue. Like why were those babies even alive in
the
Bill, you call what I
wrote above venting??? I call it calm, sincere questions which you have
avoided answering by calling it venting.
This is what I would call venting:
Judy, You are impossible!
Bill
Izzy
I
am glad we are getting to know each other better. No, That is the truth!
Nice talk, Bill. I did ask
questions for clarification, and this is what I get? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
10:31 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are
Bill Taylor wrote:
I am fairly confident that most Trinitarians would agree
with me on the wooing. I am certain that James and
Thomas Torrance do in fact believe this, and teach it
(although dear old J.B. is now deceased). The wooing
is but one aspect of a thoroughly participatory salvation
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:33:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would say -- "How about them Dodgers?"
Bill :)
What if I said that "free moral agency" is a problem for God -- who is not a free moral agent; that His "all knowing" acclaim (a claim
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If they never hear about Jesus they are guaranteed a ticket to heaven.
Actually, once again, you missed the point. No one is saying this. Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe situation :
Try
this
buk
buk buk buk b'gock!
:^
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005
16.12To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:13:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try this
buk buk buk buk b'gock!
:^
-- slade
AAA -- the theater of the mind
I've heard that eggs taste better than tripe?
John
That I
wouldn't know, but I would venture to guess, uh... YES! However, I'd have to ask my brother who
married a Mexican gal whose mother cooks a killer menudo (did I spell that
correctly?) -- or so I've heard. I eat vegetarian at his home (that's a joke...
kinda).
By the way,
Speaking of such, I am of the opinion (have
I ever been taught this???) that we are born with a propensity to sinnot actually already condemned by sin (since
we havent yet). So, in that case, anyone who dies prior to actually
sinning is not under Gods judgment, and does not go to hell. Is
In a message dated 1/13/2005 2:51:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, John... The financing on the home and property came through.. in duplicate. We can choose between two banks (Wells Fargo, I guess just took too long.).
By the way, warn Bill T for me. I plan on
So Sara has a new album out? I'd like to see her
and Troy again. I haven't seen them since I turneddown Sara's offer to
tour with them as her Sound Tech.
Jeff
Life makes warriors of us all.To emerge the victors,
we must armourselves with the most potent of weapons.That weapon is
John wrote:
Romans 2:15 -16 speaks only of a maybe
situation : ..their conscience either
accusing or defending them
In Christ, we have the assurance of our salvation
--- or, at least, some of us do.
...
Does either accusing or defending sound like
a
In a message dated 1/13/2005 1:05:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has
myth (jt resolves most biblical
questionsaprioriw/finality, not vianegotiatg
vigorous, rigoroushermeneutic expertise existentially; if it's
'hermeneutic', DavidM,then it'safter the fashion of
pseudo-intellectual cult/sect administratorswielding
autocraticself-confirmation, rubber stampg
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I understand how you are understanding this passage. What does
"assurance of salvation" or a "guaranteed ticket to heaven" have to do with
the effect of the conscience upon the mind? I have
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:30:43 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:14:11 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:I'm not sure I understand how you
are understanding this passage. What does "assurance of salvation" or a
"guaranteed ticket to
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:48:12 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the contrary, Judy, I have no problem
believing that the names of those who do not reject the Christ will remain
unblotted from the Lambs Book of Life. How about if you let me and the triad
articulate
Judy wrote I
have no ideawhat you are talking about Bill. First you might define what
you mean by "hermeneutical criteria" and then tell me
how I hold your feet to the fire and excuse myself, because to me this is
nothing but an unfounded accusation. You say there is no such thing as
Judy, if you want me to do this, I will. But when I
do, are you really going to be ready to repent? I rather doubt it. But I would
be thrilled if you are.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Now Bill, let's not rush to judgment here. You
have me convicted and sentenced while the jury is still out.
Are you certain that what I describe below is not you?
Can you provethat you don't believe these things and have never promoted them on this list? Let's take
care of these questions
A dead
baby may not be your problem, Judy, but it's many people's rather traumatic
problem. People wonder where their family members GO...especially their
childrenwhen they die. Death is a very real problem most of us have to
deal with at one time or another. The death of a child is
Allow me to give you a resent example of one of
your smears.Dependinghow you do with it, I may go further: "BTW you are included in the triad along withLance, and
Jonathan."Canyou say to me with a clear conscience and your
hand on the Bible that yoursis not a pejorative use of the word
God bless you, Kay. You are so right on with this
one.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:31
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
A
Again I apologize for all the typos. They upset me
very much. I know that I need to take a deep breath and count to ten, but this
is so very important at so many levels. I told you this on my very first
challenge of your views. To miss this, after a clear presentation of the truth,
is a
Jt, also I have learned that when a
certain mormon fellow (to remain unnamed) asks us to define anything it is to
get us squabbling about definitions amongst ourselves; thus avoiding him
answering any specific, uncomfortable questions himself. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:31:07 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
A
dead baby may not be your problem, Judy, but it's many people's rather
traumatic problem. People wonder where their family members GO...especially
their childrenwhen they die. Death is a very real
In a message dated 1/11/2005 11:52:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no idea what you are talking about Bill. First you might define what you mean by "hermeneutical criteria"
and then tell me how I hold your feet to the fire and excuse myself, because to me this is
I
guess you understood what I was trying to say. I'm not the greatest of
writers.
Thank
you, Bill.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bill
TaylorSent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 09.46To:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:54:55 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The hermeneutical criteria that I am
questioningis the criteria of interpretation that you use against others
but are unwilling to apply to yourself. Let me state it in different words. At
the beginning of
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:02:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Kay...in this shade: Judy
in this shade
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005
08:31:07 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
A dead baby may not be your problem, Judy, but it's many people's
Do you
really not get it or are you faking it?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 13.04To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
jt: I don't "fake" stuff Kay, what am I supposed to be
getting that I don't get? All anyone can have is an
opinion about this question - unless you have some
hidden insight and if you do then please share.. judyt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:13:55 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I hear you Izzy - seems like I can also recall going
through this procedure before and I've not been around
TT as long as you ...
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:12:15 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jt, also I have
learned that when a certain mormon fellow (to remain
Bill Taylor wrote:
Now let me give you and example of
your caricatures from a recent post? However,
this is subject to change if anyone can show me in the scriptures that
I am in error and so far none of the "eternal son" people have done so.
While I
admit that on this
Bill Taylor wrote:
The hermeneutical criteria that I am questioning
is the criteria of interpretation that you use against
others but are unwilling to apply to yourself.
... you sent a series of posts stating that no where
in Scripture are the words eternal Son used. You
therefore used that
From: Bill Taylor
Allow me to give you a
resent example of one of your smears.Dependinghow you do with it,
I may go further:
"BTW
you are included in the triad along withLance, and
Jonathan."
Canyou say to me
with a clear conscience and your hand on the Bible that
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:53 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O poor poor John,
yes, that's me. :-)
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:53 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even though we do not all affirm your view concerning a lack of a fallen nature, there are at least a couple of us who will affirm the absence of a concept of "spiritual death" in the biblical narrative.
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: JOHN a dead baby is not my problem. I have a Heavenly Father whose nature and character is love and so I
leave all those kinds of problems with Him cause I don't have to know everything. However, what
Yeah, that's pretty funny, Terry.
Do I value my opinion too highly? I hope not! The
truth is that I spend most of my time feeling very inadequate about my thoughts
and opinions;I feellike I have failed to communicate what I really
wanted to say.I place this burden upon myself; Ifeel
In a message dated 1/12/2005 5:42:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The soul that sinneth, it shall die -- is not a true statement for those who are in Christ.
JD, then by your theology there will be very few in hell, and most everyone in heavencorrect? Izzy
In a message dated 1/12/2005 11:42:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After all, if you were correct, wouldn't David and I agree with you?
Terry
lol
jt: I don't fake stuff Kay,
what am I supposed to be getting that I don't get? All anyone can have is
an
opinion about this question - unless you
have some hidden insight and if you do then please share.. judyt
Speaking of such, I am of the opinion
(have I ever been taught
And Judy, don't deceive yourself: I have stated it in a coherent and cogent way.
=
I guess thats
why Terry, jt, DavidM, and I still dont get it??? Izzy
If this explains why they did not die on that day, then why did they die
later? If the substitution stopped them from dying on that day, then why
not forever?
Genesis 3:22-23a Then the LORD God said, Behold, the man has become
like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out
You have been shown the error of your
theology, yet you mock uswith words andtitles like: 'eternal Sonship' - relationship - community
thing. This is a caricature; it is aderogatory
imitationof our beliefs san the substance of content.
In
Lances terminology, I think that
Thanks, David, for attempting to articulate Judy's position. Perhaps you
have stated it correctly.
Bill
PS My position against the concept of spiritual death does not necessitate a
non-reductionistic, non-dualistic understanding of personhood, nor does it
grow out of that understanding. My
The soul that sinneth, it shall die -- is not a true
statement for those who are in Christ.
JD,
then by your theology there will be very few in hell, and most everyone in
heavencorrect? Izzy
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20-21-
Oh, sorry, Izzy, I am busy
JT wrote I
want you to go as far back as you can and find someone I have damned to hell
either on or off this list.
Does the name Newbigin ring a bell?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
JOHN
I hope
you haven't stopped the discussion completely, because there are alot of
questions and discussions we could all have regarding Whose Names are Written in
the Lambs Book of life...
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Vaguely but I don't remember "damning Newbigin to hell"
and since you claim that I did this Bill then you
need to show me in my own words what I said. This
is a very serious accusation. judyt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:43:05 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JT wrote I
want
In a message dated 1/12/2005 1:54:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JOHN
I hope you haven't stopped the discussion completely, because there are alot of questions and discussions we could all have regarding Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Book of life...
Kay
I
In a message dated 1/12/2005 2:04:58 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JOHN
I hope you haven't stopped the discussion completely, because there are alot of questions and discussions we could all have regarding Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Book of life...
Kay
Judy wrote: "Newbigin must be an unbeliever also
because the mind is not the home of faith. Faith resides in the heart... One may
have a heart of faith or an evil heart of unbelief."
Judy,where do those unbelievers with evil
hearts spend eternity? You knew at the time you wrote this that
Bill is this what you do when you study scripture?
ie:put words in the mouths of others and take off running?
What I wrote concerning Newbigin's writingwas an
observation from scripture which contrasts a heart of faith with an
evil heart of unbelief. I don't remember what I was
commenting on
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:28
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Bill is this what you do
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:37:50 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the contrary, Judy, at the time
of your judgment you did know of his background and that he had died. You
may not have intended it as such, but your judgment of
him, in the context of how it was made, did very
The original correspondence came from Judy
Tayloron March 26, 2004 7:38 PM MST. The thread name was
"POLYANYI"
The private correspondence was sent to Judy the
same day at 11:32 PM MST. I believe it was the next day that you posted it on
TT. It was posted under the subject **Private
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
