Good thought. Thanks.
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 24 September, 2003 19:56
Subject: RE: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBAB
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject
Yes. The owner of my ISP does that if certain parameters are met. I
drives me crazy because I usually remember t
]
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Perry
Locke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 September, 2003
23:37
Subject: Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk]
PROBABLE SPAM" in subject
Actually, it most likely did not orginate with Slade's e
Actually, it most likely did not orginate with Slade's emailer, but his response was the first one in the thread to be labeled as probable spam.
>From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Rea
If you trace back to the message without "Re:" before the "PROBABLE SPAM" message, that individual's email handler detected something in the message that made it label it as probable spam. That would be Slade. Then, when he "Replied" to the message, the "Re:" was added to the beginning, and all su
5 matches
Mail list logo