Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson
Good thought. Thanks. shalom slade e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 24 September, 2003 19:56 Subject: RE: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBAB

RE: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-24 Thread David Miller
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject Yes. The owner of my ISP does that if certain parameters are met. I drives me crazy because I usually remember t

Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-24 Thread Slade Henson
] - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 23 September, 2003 23:37 Subject: Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject Actually, it most likely did not orginate with Slade's e

Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-23 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Actually, it most likely did not orginate with Slade's emailer, but his response was the first one in the thread to be labeled as probable spam. >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Rea

Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-23 Thread Charles Perry Locke
If you trace back to the message without "Re:" before the "PROBABLE SPAM" message, that individual's email handler detected something in the message that made it label it as probable spam. That would be Slade. Then, when he "Replied" to the message, the "Re:" was added to the beginning, and all su