Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 23:24:01 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > After extracting: > > > > > # CONFIG_USER_NS is not set > > For future reference, there is also zless and zgrep :) . > > > So I guess Arch Linux won't work

Re: [tup] Multiple output groups?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > Yeah, they can be handy :). Part of me thinks that we could just use > groups > > for inputs/outputs and not list any files manually. Though we'd also have > > to fix the explicit-listing-of-output-files issue

Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On Thursday 01 of October 2015 10:09:56 Mike Shal wrote: > > - If you don't have such a kernel, your paths have '.tup/mnt/@tupjob-X' > in > > them (which messes up things that stuff the current working directory

Re: [tup] Multiple output groups?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On Thursday 01 of October 2015 10:05:17 Mike Shal wrote: > > Hmm, can you give an example here? I don't understand why you'd want to > > have libsomething.a and then a group - after all, an > > archive is really

Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Thursday 01 of October 2015 10:09:56 Mike Shal wrote: > - If you don't have such a kernel, your paths have '.tup/mnt/@tupjob-X' in > them (which messes up things that stuff the current working directory in > the output file), and updater.full_deps=1 would fail I hope you don't want to remove

Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Thursday 01 of October 2015 12:55:49 Mike Shal wrote: > Well I was wondering if it makes sense to only support the normal paths > where namespacing is enabled, so I could get rid of the ^c flag and suid & > privilege dropping code. I hope you won't disable that any time soon (; This is very

Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Thursday 01 of October 2015 14:36:28 Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 19:03:17 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > Reading this - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36969 - I think that > > "never" > > wouldn't be such a big exaggeration... It seems that user namespaces are > > a > > big

Re: [tup] Tup and linux namespaces

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 19:03:17 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > Reading this - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36969 - I think that "never" > wouldn't be such a big exaggeration... It seems that user namespaces are a > big source of security vulnerabilities, see the links posted around the end