Re: [tup] Multiple output groups?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > Yeah, they can be handy :). Part of me thinks that we could just use > groups > > for inputs/outputs and not list any files manually. Though we'd also have > > to fix the explicit-listing-of-output-files issue

Re: [tup] Multiple output groups?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On Thursday 01 of October 2015 10:05:17 Mike Shal wrote: > > Hmm, can you give an example here? I don't understand why you'd want to > > have libsomething.a and then a group - after all, an > > archive is really

Re: [tup] Multiple output groups?

Hello Mike! On Tuesday 29 of September 2015 16:34:04 Mike Shal wrote: > I don't think there are any major technical reasons why it couldn't be > implemented. There was an issue filed on github a while back for this that > has some more details: https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/166 Good to