Hi Daniel,
the patch you attached to #1994 is not in the proper format and that's
why Chris saw it empty in trac. Because you should send only unified
diff patches.
diff -u
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Daniel Fetchinson schrieb:
#1710: [PATCH] one-time task scheduler
-+--
Reporter: khorn|Owner: Chris Arndt
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: normal
On 9/24/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide schrieb:
On 9/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1.1 this will be an intermediate solution anyway, since I want to
use the tgsetupng.py way for 1.1 and going forward as soon as we have
the
Florent Aide schrieb:
On 9/24/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide schrieb:
On 9/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1.1 this will be an intermediate solution anyway, since I want to
use the tgsetupng.py way for 1.1 and going forward as soon as
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 14:40:43 Christopher Arndt wrote:
Florent Aide schrieb:
On 9/24/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide schrieb:
On 9/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For 1.1 this will be an intermediate solution anyway, since I
On 9/24/08, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if the beta releases are not put in PyPi easy_install won't be
able to install them, so it is possible.
Not sufficient. PyPi references our egg page so that binary eggs can
be autodownloaded. This would means hosting TG egg out of the egg
Mark Ramm schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
Nevertheless, if technically possible, I agree that easy_install
should only install stable releases. If it is technically not possible
I of course accept that and will use tgsetup.py
Well if the beta releases are not
Ha, that's two forks this week:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/topp-engineering/blog/2008/09/24/pyinstall-a-new-hope/
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
for those of you who did not receive the new yet, someone (Tarek
Ziadé) launched a
On 9/24/08, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha, that's two forks this week:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/topp-engineering/blog/2008/09/24/pyinstall-a-new-hope/
pyinstall seems to aim only at replacing easy_install where
Distribute aims at forking the whole setuptools development.
On 9/24/08, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha, that's two forks this week:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/topp-engineering/blog/2008/09/24/pyinstall-a-new-hope/
pyinstall seems to aim only at replacing easy_install where
Distribute aims at forking the whole setuptools development.
Mark Ramm wrote:
Ha, that's two forks this week:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/topp-engineering/blog/2008/09/24/pyinstall-a-new-hope/
A reimplementation, really -- there's no shared code.
--
Ian Bicking : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://blog.ianbicking.org
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 08:36 -0500 schrieb Lukasz Szybalski:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Steven Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how does this process work? Do we have some webpage that we can
look at it or?
Chris' and my idea is to create a build slave which runs on the
Ha, that's two forks this week:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/topp-engineering/blog/2008/09/24/pyinstall-a-new-hope/
A reimplementation, really -- there's no shared code.
True. Just commenting on the proximity of the two announcements. :)
Seems that frustrations with easy_install
the patch you attached to #1994 is not in the proper format and that's
why Chris saw it empty in trac. Because you should send only unified
diff patches.
diff -u
Sorry, I'll do that next time.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown
14 matches
Mail list logo
