On Monday February 2, 2009 08:26:08 Jorge Vargas wrote:
I just have one question what is the purpose of repoze.what-quickstart
I see you added it to the deps of the quickstarted project but I fail
to find where it's used. I took at look at the package and it doesn't
seems like quickstart to
Gustavo Narea schrieb:
So, in fact it's more than a repoze.what plugin -- it's a repoze.who plugin
too. It's a plugin to configure both repoze.who and repoze.what in one go.
Thus a better distribution name may be repoze.auth-quickstart.
How about repoze.auth-quickconf? That would be less
On Monday February 2, 2009 16:41:07 Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
How about repoze.auth-quickconf? That would be less confusing.
+1, I like it better. :)
Although, I'd prefer to change it once repoze.what v2 is out, or when we're
getting close. Right now r.what v1 is not the de facto
Concerning the name changes or merging of projects, actually I don't
know much about the background (repoze, the plugin concept etc.) so if
you think that does not make much sense, please ignore my suggestions.
-- Christoph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
On Saturday January 31, 2009 00:49:07 Mark Ramm wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
In r6204 I applied a not so drastic solution:
On Saturday January 31, 2009 00:49:07 Mark Ramm wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
In r6204 I applied a not so drastic solution:
http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/6204
But again I think it'd be better if we removed the ability to select
In r6204 I applied a not so drastic solution:
http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/6204
But again I think it'd be better if we removed the ability to select the
hashing algorithm, mostly to make the template a bit simpler. Can I go for
that?
Cheers.
On Thursday January 29, 2009 17:38:14
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
In r6204 I applied a not so drastic solution:
http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/6204
But again I think it'd be better if we removed the ability to select the
hashing algorithm, mostly to make the template a bit
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Florent Aide florent.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jorge Vargas jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote:
to be clear, that's my point why will that won't work? why will I need
to load tg in order to use a console script? can't we just inline
On Wednesday January 28, 2009 16:40:53 Mark Ramm wrote:
It's lossible that we
could simplify it bit, but it works.
Why don't we just drop the ability to select the hashing algorithm and use
salted SHA1 by default? It won't break existing applications.
To be honest, I don't that feature:
*
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Florent Aide florent.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Jorge Vargas jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
today while upgrading an old project (1.9.7) to a more current version
(2.0b4) I found a very interesting case.
I used a
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jorge Vargas jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote:
to be clear, that's my point why will that won't work? why will I need
to load tg in order to use a console script? can't we just inline that
in the model where it should be? Just as Gustavo said simply add the 3
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Jorge Vargas jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
today while upgrading an old project (1.9.7) to a more current version
(2.0b4) I found a very interesting case.
I used a custom script to create users which generated a very
interesting result, here is
13 matches
Mail list logo
