On 9/22/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 gazillion on not wasting your voluntary effort for TG on supporting
this outdated piece of crap. If customers want support for IE6 they
should pay for it BIG TIME.
I'm 100% with Chris on this one. This template is mostly going to be
On Mon, 2008-22-09 at 08:02 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/08, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 gazillion on not wasting your voluntary effort for TG on supporting
this outdated piece of crap. If customers want support for IE6 they
should pay for it BIG TIME.
Christoph Zwerschke schrieb:
Christopher Arndt schrieb:
- Should the Genshi Buffet plugin determine the doctype from the
template format? Should this be reported as a bug to the Genshi project?
I think Genshi should never send a doctype that is incompatible with the
format (doctype=HTML
Well, there are lots of tickets, including some documentation clean up
tickets which need some love:
http://trac.turbogears.org/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedgroup=milestonemilestone=2.0milestone=2.0-preview-1milestone=2.0-preview-2milestone=1.9.7a4milestone=1.9.7b1order=priority
TG2 is still using buffet at the moment, but will be moving away from
it between 1.9.7 and 2.0.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Zwerschke schrieb:
Christopher Arndt schrieb:
- Should the Genshi Buffet plugin determine the doctype from the
Christopher Arndt schrieb:
Is anybody using the Buffet API except TurboGears 1.x nowadays anyway?
Except for Genshi, all of the above mentioned Buffet plugins are under
our control, so we could change them easily. We can also make our own
Genshi Buffet plugin, if we need to.
As far as I
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:15 PM, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, good to know, thanks for the feedback. I think in the interest of
timeliness what I will do is to try to establish the basic html
structure, layout, class, and id guidelines, and make the TG template
pages first so
Hey folks, dunno if this is intentional or not, but easy_install
turbogears is now installing 1.1 beta.
Shouldn't this default to 1.0.7?
Thanks
Iain
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears
On 23/09/2008, at 10:06 AM, Christopher Arndt wrote:
iain duncan schrieb:
Hey folks, dunno if this is intentional or not, but easy_install
turbogears is now installing 1.1 beta.
Shouldn't this default to 1.0.7?
No, easy_install is always installing the latest version, that's
available
On Tue, 2008-23-09 at 02:06 +0200, Christopher Arndt wrote:
iain duncan schrieb:
Hey folks, dunno if this is intentional or not, but easy_install
turbogears is now installing 1.1 beta.
Shouldn't this default to 1.0.7?
No, easy_install is always installing the latest version, that's
On Mon, 2008-22-09 at 22:07 -0700, iain duncan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-23-09 at 02:06 +0200, Christopher Arndt wrote:
iain duncan schrieb:
Hey folks, dunno if this is intentional or not, but easy_install
turbogears is now installing 1.1 beta.
Shouldn't this default to 1.0.7?
iain duncan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-23-09 at 02:06 +0200, Christopher Arndt wrote:
No, easy_install is always installing the latest version, that's
available on the download page linked on the projects PyPI page.
Thatswhy the official and supported installation method is the one
described on
12 matches
Mail list logo