o rebuild everything from scratch from an empty local Maven repos
and everything worked fine.
The new revision number is 383125. I suggest we do not touch anymore
and tag revision 383125.
--Jean-Sebastien
Ok. I just tagged r383125 of the /java source tree to
/tags/java-stable-20060304. I
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. I updated the JIRA with a new patch that fix
the scoping issue.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r383063 -
/incubator/tusca
Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-66?page=comments#action_12368897
> ]
>
> Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-66:
> ---
>
> Jeremy, have you constructed an integration test apparatus for the
> web app work you are doing that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-66?page=comments#action_12368897 ]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-66:
---
Jeremy, have you constructed an integration test apparatus for the web app work
you are doing that we could reuse here to have testing o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-66?page=comments#action_12368896 ]
Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-66:
--
Patch applied - the build works but I have not run the sample code
In a separate change I did an extensive reformat and clean up o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-66?page=all ]
Raymond Feng updated TUSCANY-66:
Attachment: rfeng1.diff
Here's the new patch to fully fix the scope problem. Please review and apply. I
run it with the latest code and it works fine.
Backgro
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. I updated the JIRA with a new patch that fix
the scoping issue.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r383063 -
/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/binding.axi
Forgot the +1 :)
On Mar 4, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Also, pom.xml in SCA still includes the axis1 binding, so people
need to
manually add the activation and mail jars to their maven
repositories.
Weren't we going to take this out of the build?
.
This is great Sebastien!
On Mar 4, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
After some bring-up work today - and a number of bug fixes :) - I
think that we have reached a stable state with all of our end to
end scenarios working fine (including the Bigbank scenario) with
our new Tom
Update Tuscany SCA implementation to use SDO extension API
--
Key: TUSCANY-70
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-70
Project: Tuscany
Type: Sub-task
Components: Java SCA Axis Integration, Java SC
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-69?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes updated TUSCANY-69:
-
Component: Java SDO Implementation
Description: Provide a documented API in Tuscany's SDO implementation that
provides an interface to SDO for applicati
Provide an extension API in Tucany's SDO implementation to support environments
with multiple classloaders
--
Key: TUSCANY-69
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY
Work with SDO spec group to resolve issues around INSTANCE
--
Key: TUSCANY-68
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-68
Project: Tuscany
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
Work with the spec
ClassLoader issues with SDO
---
Key: TUSCANY-67
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-67
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Java Spec APIs, Java SDO Implementation
Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
The SDO spec makes extensive
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I meant to help instead of a trouble-maker.
>
Thanks - your help is appreciated. Perhaps the comments were a little
harsh but the mixture of reformatting and a functional change makes it
hard for people to review understand a change before applying it, which
will ty
Hi, Ant.
It seems that I used an old version of the template. Sorry for the
inconvienence.I just updated the formatter.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 2:10 AM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-66) W
Hi,
I meant to help instead of a trouble-maker.
1) My Eclipse does have the template "maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml" loaded
and I formatted the code based on it. I'm not sure why it produces different
a format.
2) The acceptance testing was broken last night. After debugging, I found
the service p
Please take Ant's comment to heart - it is very hard to review something
if the actual change is buried amongst a mass of code reformatting.
Patches like that are often rejected out of hand.
Digging through this one I have concerns about what it is doing. The
Axis servlet is now going to the root
+1
On 3/4/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > Also, pom.xml in SCA still includes the axis1 binding, so people need to
> > manually add the activation and mail jars to their maven repositories.
> > Weren't we going to take this out of the build?
> >
> >
ant elder wrote:
Also, pom.xml in SCA still includes the axis1 binding, so people need to
manually add the activation and mail jars to their maven repositories.
Weren't we going to take this out of the build?
...ant
On 3/4/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should the revision be 3
Also, pom.xml in SCA still includes the axis1 binding, so people need to
manually add the activation and mail jars to their maven repositories.
Weren't we going to take this out of the build?
...ant
On 3/4/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Should the revision be 383114?
>
> ...a
Should the revision be 383114?
...ant
On 3/4/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great stuff! +1 from me to tag this.
>
>
> On 3/4/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > After some bring-up work today - and a number of bug fixes :) - I think
> > that we have re
Great stuff! +1 from me to tag this.
On 3/4/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After some bring-up work today - and a number of bug fixes :) - I think
> that we have reached a stable state with all of our end to end scenarios
> working fine (including the Bigbank scenario) w
After some bring-up work today - and a number of bug fixes :) - I think
that we have reached a stable state with all of our end to end scenarios
working fine (including the Bigbank scenario) with our new Tomcat
integration story and our brand new Axis2 Web Service binding.
You should be able t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-66?page=comments#action_12368846 ]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-66:
--
Thanks for the diff Raymond, but you've formatted the code so most lines are
flaged as changed so its real hard to see what the fix you've
25 matches
Mail list logo
