Default scope for system components should be MODULE not INSTANCE
-
Key: TUSCANY-200
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-200
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-200?page=comments#action_12374764
]
Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-200:
---
Jim started to make this change in r394333 but that only impacts the builder.
During loading, introspection on the class
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-200?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes updated TUSCANY-200:
--
Description: The default scope for system components is currently INSTANCE
but the typical usage is module (was: The default scope for system components
I think we may need something like this again when we support nested
configuration...what do you think?
On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jboynes
Date: Mon Apr 17 06:37:49 2006
New Revision: 394667
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394667view=rev
Log:
Jim Marino wrote:
I think we may need something like this again when we support nested
configuration...what do you think?
I couldn't think of why. The model for the whole configuration is
created by the loaders and the AssemblyVisitor walks the whole tree to
build it.
No problem with adding
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-39?page=all ]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-39:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed svn revision 394728. See DefineTypeTestCase for examples of how to
use it.
SDO TypeHelper.define not implemented
(08:31:21 AM) ant_: Hi everyone. 16:30 by my clock, shall we begin?
(08:31:48 AM) haleh: yes
(08:32:06 AM) jboynes: yep
(08:32:16 AM) jboynes: where should we start?
(08:33:06 AM) cr22rc: go around and interoduce ourselfs ? .. (just kidding)
(08:33:13 AM) *jsdelfino:* are we going to discuss our
Ran into a slight snag
Several of the more advanced things in Celtix are defined/activated based
on extension elements in the WSDL. In celtix, those extensors are
defined by a schema and code generated using JAXB. We register an
ExtensionRegistry with the WSDLReader so the extensors
I've attached the patch for core. It's very simple.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core/loader/impl/WSDLDefinitionRegistryImpl.java
Talked to Jeremy on the IRC (isn't IRC nice for resolving these issues)
and we've come up with a plan to add an ExtensionRegistry to the
WSDLDefinitionRegistry that can be used to solve this problem. Celtix
can use and anyone else that needs it can also use it.
Thanks!
Dan
On Monday 17
Allow extensions to WSDL processing
---
Key: TUSCANY-201
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-201
Project: Tuscany
Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core
Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
Assigned to: Jeremy Boynes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-201?page=all ]
Daniel Kulp updated TUSCANY-201:
Attachment: wsdl_patch
Allow extensions to WSDL processing
---
Key: TUSCANY-201
URL:
SDO: Calling getProperty() freezes property list
Key: TUSCANY-203
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-203
Project: Tuscany
Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO Implementation
Reporter: Brent Daniel
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-201?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes updated TUSCANY-201:
--
Attachment: wsdl_patch
Attached patch originally sent to mailing list by Dan Kulp
Allow extensions to WSDL processing
DAS should allow for convention to reduce need for configuration
Key: TUSCANY-204
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-204
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Components: Java DAS RDB
Hi,
Here's a sample report from the Tuscany Continuum build. Please let me know
if it provides any value if I add tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to the
notfication list.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Tuscany Continuum Build tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Google are re-running their Summer of Code program this year. Project
ideas are due before May 1st so that they can be presented to students.
For more info see http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2006
I'm willing to help mentor interested students if we have any proposals
that we would
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-201?page=comments#action_12374829
]
Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-201:
---
The InterfaceWSDLLoader has been modified to intialize portType information
using the WSDLDefinitionRegistry so these
Hi,
This is my first post. I work on SCA for IBM.
I found an issue (which I mentioned on the phone to Sebastien today). I'm
not sure if it was a purposeful or accidental design decision, so before
opening up a JIRA I thought I'd write this up.
In short.. do you really want to cache the URLs
I'd vote for seeing this report only when there are failures.
Who will file JIRA issues for failures?
On 4/17/06, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here's a sample report from the Tuscany Continuum build. Please let me
know
if it provides any value if I add tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
