Hi,
I have shared a recent experience in this regard with comments inline.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 4/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/29/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
One reason the SPI module is so large is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1218:
--
Assignee: ant elder (was: Simon Nash)
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation. He ...
- been active in
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of
you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of
+1 from me
On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in
+1
On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken
On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07,
I've tried this and it fixes all the problems I've been having with building
the Axis2 binding, before building the binding would usually fail, now so
far its worked every time, so I've committed the fix. However, I do now get
am intermittent read timeout in the SDOWSDLTestCase itest which looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490897
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1218:
Thanks for the patch, I've committed it now and it looks like it fixes
Ant,
Thanks for committing this. I'll do a new checkout and see if
I can recreate the other problem.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
I've tried this and it fixes all the problems I've been having with
building
the Axis2 binding, before building the binding would usually fail, now so
far its worked
+1 from me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/23/2007 04:38:57 AM:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of
you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
the
+1 from me
Paul
PS a recent discussion on qpid-dev indicates you need a good dose (3)
of IPMC votes to make this binding.
PPS (my +1 is IPMC binding)
On 4/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me. Welcome Andy!
kelvin goodson wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java
+1 from me. Welcome Andy!
kelvin goodson wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some
of you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
the
lists to show
+1 from me.
- Venkat
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS). As some of
you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-863:
Attachment: JIRA863-dbsetup-patch-Apr23-Amita.txt
clicked wrong choice for ASF inclusion
Incorrect assertions in XSDChoiceTest
-
Key: TUSCANY-1222
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1222
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-863:
Attachment: JIRA863-dbsetup-patch-Apr23-Amita.txt
changes only in DBSChemaHelper - for
Incorrect containment value when creating property from XSD
---
Key: TUSCANY-1221
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1221
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1222:
Attachment: jira-1222.patch
Incorrect assertions in XSDChoiceTest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490950
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1221:
-
I don't understand this. The red element is not Complex Type.
I am interested in setting up a single instance of the Tuscany runtime
to run multiple SCA applications. I noticed that the SimpleRuntime and
SimpleRuntimeInfo classes define a 1:1 relationship between the
runtime and an SCA application. Based on this mechanism, I believe I
can do the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove resolved TUSCANY-1221.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Marking this JIRA as invalid.
Incorrect containment value when creating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1222:
Attachment: jira-1222-v2.patch
Attaching a new version of the patch file. Please disregard the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1222.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 531507.
Incorrect assertions in XSDChoiceTest
Anyone has deployable sample-bigbank-webclient.war and
sample-bigbank-account.war files that you can pass on to me?
Thanks in advance:-)
Mahi
Mahi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a link from where I can get self-contained
sample-bigbank-webclient.war and
Can you find some information in http://lresende.blogspot.com/ but you not
find that information where you try find...
The SCA has many modifications after the version 1.0-incubator-M2, I'm
suggest you make a checkout and build the last version in
+1 (non-binding). Well done.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL
I took a look at the RC and didn't see any issues. It includes all the
stuff I expected, and I was able to download and run the samples. I'm not
enough of an Apache expert to comment on whether all the procedural issues
have been addressed or not, but hopefully others will cover that.
Frank.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
Cool, that works and gets me the name thanks.
Should Component have a URI? The o.a.t.assembly.Component interface
doesn't
have a get/setURI which seems to match the schema in the spec, but
page 53
line 2362 of the Assembly spec makes it
ant elder wrote:
Currently o.a.t.assembly.Implementation is extending
o.a.t.assembly.ComponentType, is there a reason for this, I guess I
though
an Implementation would have a ComponentType rather than be a
ComponentType?
...ant
Yes there is a reason for this. The current assembly model
I think the M2 arrangement for the construction of the WAR file
was quite complex and hard to reproduce by non-maven users who
didn't have the special plugin. I wrote some documentation for
the web site in case anyone wanted to do this with M2 and it wasn't
very easy, especially the
+1.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:38 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in
On 4/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Currently o.a.t.assembly.Implementation is extending
o.a.t.assembly.ComponentType, is there a reason for this, I guess I
though
an Implementation would have a ComponentType rather than be a
ComponentType?
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Simon.
[snip]
On the positive side this seems like an approach we could use that
separates logging/tracing from the application code. However you
still need
the aspectj runtime to weave the annotation based aspects into the
application classfiles right. I am
XSD base64Binary type mapping to wrong SDO type
---
Key: TUSCANY-1223
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1223
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Monitoring, logging, and exceptions (was: Re: Notifcation of
missing extensions)
Hi Guys,
I finally managed to catch up on this. I think you're heading in the wrong
direction by using HelperProvider.getDefaultContext() because:
1) it's a singleton, and we're trying to get away from singletons:
static HelperContext defaultContext = new DefaultHelperContext();
The fact
XSDComplexTypeTest patch
Key: TUSCANY-1224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1224
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite
Reporter: Andy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1224:
Attachment: jira-1224.patch
Patch that fixes errors in test case, as described above, and also
muhwas wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a quick question. If i put a
@Callback(CallBackInterface.class) on my bussiness
interface then all method in that interface has to be
asynchronous or i can use synchronous method too?
thanks,
muhwas
I thought Callback is actually asynchronous method
call. because client call the method and then continue
and then server does some processing then using the
callback interface notify client that processing is
complete.
I am having problem when i include both callback and
synchronous method in the
I think that the java/sca/contrib directory has potential to confuse
people, as many modules under contrib have obsolete pom.xml files, are
not actively maintained and are not building.
I was thinking about renaming the pom.xml files under contrib to
pom.xml.off for example and adding a
Thanks Raymond. That may work for me. I'll try it out.
--
Kevin
On 4/20/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Kevin,
When one ore more deployable composites from a contribution are added to
the
SCA domain, all the components in the composite will become direct
children
of the SCA
Hi
At relatively short notice I've sorted out a trip to ApacheCon Europe in
Amsterdam next week. I expect to be there Tuesday evening through Friday and
would love to put faces to the names of any of the Tuscany crowd. So if you
fancy meeting up for a beer/juice/coffee etc. drop me a line and
The databinding itests seem to hang, blocking the build. Is anybody else
running into this?
I have moved these itests temporarily out of the build until this is
resolved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jsdelfino
Date: Mon Apr 23 14:43:24 2007
New Revision: 531619
URL:
Hi Frank,
Can you help me understand why defaultContext is a singleton? I don't see
it
described that way in the specs, so I'm hoping you can help me understand
this.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday,
The IPMC has found an issue with a missing notice in the SDO C++ source
release being voted on. To fix this I can either remove the offending file
or update the Notice text. After re-building the distro to include this fix
do I need to hold another vote here for this release?
Cheers,
--
Pete
48 matches
Mail list logo
