On 8/12/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
i.e. sca/modules/binding-sca-xml
Thanks for pointing this out Jean-Sebastien.
OK - I tried building the module by itself. I'm running jdk 1.6, but that
should be ok right? I get the following:
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to
Hi Sebastien,
Yes, this was what I intended to do initially. But got a bit
concerned about losing the original state of the model after build
time. I was thinking of a Admin or Mgmt function that might display
the original configurations before thing got built i.e. computed or
aggregated. For
Hi Sebastien, thanks for that explanation. I get your point. For now
I'd revert back those changes to 'Operation' and will figure out an
alternative.
- Venkat
On 8/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Sebastien, thanks for responding. I am still
Hi Simon,
Simon Laws wrote:
I note from your other post that you are having problems with the full build
with JDK1.6. Is it possible for you to try with 1.5 as this is known to
work? We can then isolate JDK issues from these more general build issues.
Oh Man - It almost made it - I gave
as the title, when composite contents comes more and more complicated, a layout
graph generator would do greate help to developers.
Or did some one see commercial providers of such a grapher?
Good day.
-
Building a website is a piece of cake.
Yahoo!
Great help, thank you very much. You realy make me a litte uneasy: I need to
give more time to spec analyzation.
Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/07, shaoguang geng wrote:
Today, I found in respond to each request, Tuscany instantiate new one
class for each. I tried binding.ws, it
I am trying to execute itests from itest folder with mvn. Everything went
fine without any errors including the sample itest that we are trying to
write. However I have observed that, while trying to execute itests from
each itest folder, for few folders it says There are no tests to run. What
On 8/9/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess early the following week still leaves time for an August release.
It will be real tight though so we'll all need to be quick and thorough
with
our RC reviews as one problem once we get to the IPMC voting and it could
easily slip it into
Simon Laws wrote:
+1 for 21st as the target. Can I suggest we take some time (assuming there
is some) on the 20th to test the samples and check through the readmes etc
before taking the branch.
We could probably get a stable distribution available on the 20th,
and we would check that.
On
Hi Ole
Here is what I tried, and all went OK
1.Removed .m2\repository\org\apache\tuscany
2.svn update to revision #565235
3.cd %tuscany_home%\java
4.mvn -U -fn clean install
java version 1.5.0_12
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
10 matches
Mail list logo
