Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Rajini Sivaram
Would it be possible to add an OSGi manifest header into these zip files so that the zips can be directly installed into an OSGi runtime? The entries will not have any impact when used without OSGi. The only issue would be the creation of these entries. We have two options - 1)generate them

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being distributed are OK. The ${pom.name} is changed by the build process so the generated artifact has the proper name, for example, the jar built for wsdl2java ends up with a NOTICE file containing Apache Tuscany SCA WSDL2Java Tool, see

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1483) Static SDO generator: problem with elements named internal*

2008-01-24 Thread Kelvin Goodson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561997#action_12561997 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1483: - Your most recent patch (

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1927) WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for / under load

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1927: -- Assignee: ant elder WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

2008-01-24 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=41236projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 24 Jan 2008 05:09:50 -0800 Finished at: Thu 24 Jan 2008 06:08:35 -0800 Total time: 58m 44s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

2008-01-24 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=41236projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 24 Jan 2008 05:09:50 -0800 Finished at: Thu 24 Jan 2008 06:08:35 -0800 Total time: 58m 44s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1927) WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for / under load

2008-01-24 Thread Giorgio Zoppi
This was exactly the problem, which I had a while ago with callbacks :). 2008/1/24, ant elder (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1927:

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1927) WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for / under load

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder resolved TUSCANY-1927. Resolution: Fixed Changed code to work as suggested WS Binding throws

Re: [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1927) WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for / under load

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
Hopefully this should fix it then, I've committed the fix for it, would you be able to see if it resolves it for you? ...ant On Jan 24, 2008 2:38 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was exactly the problem, which I had a while ago with callbacks :). 2008/1/24, ant elder

Re: [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1927) WS Binding throws ServiceRuntimeException: No callback wire found for / under load

2008-01-24 Thread Giorgio Zoppi
2008/1/24, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hopefully this should fix it then, I've committed the fix for it, would you be able to see if it resolves it for you? Now i've not time because I'm going to graduate next February 15th, so I've a great deal of work to do. We'll see after my graduation.

Transaction intents

2008-01-24 Thread Greg Dritschler
I have been looking at the SCA Transaction spec and I have noticed some difficulties reconciling the transaction intent descriptions with the capabilities of the policy framework. 1) The SCA Transaction spec has several sets of mutually-exclusive intents: managedTransaction and

Re: Transaction intents

2008-01-24 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, For the issue related to intents of services being copied over to the references, I had assumed that bindings and implementation extensions would never have to look at intents and they'd simply go about rolling out the policysets. To resolve to the applicable policysets I had done this

Re: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
Updating this list with other suggestions gives (added points 6-9): 1) applications to contain only the code and other artifacts required for the application itself not Tuscany internals - simple sca contribution jars 2) some sort of runtime(s) which can run those application contribution jars,

Size of the binary distribution

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
I had a look at what makes up the size of the binary distribution, here's some details: The 1.1 binary distribution is about 65 Meg, of that 50 Meg is from all the jars in the lib directory, 8.5 Meg is from the calculator webapp sample, 2.5Meg is from the mortgage loan approval demo doc, and 2.5

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being distributed are OK. Surely the archive bundles are also distributed? == There are some discrepancies in the jar files covered by the LICENSE file - the names mentioned in the

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 5:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip If this is mainly about reducing the size of the download [snip] No I'm puzzled by this. One of the two goals at the start of this thread was smaller packages. I'm puzzled that you find that

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Rajini Sivaram wrote: Would it be possible to add an OSGi manifest header into these zip files so that the zips can be directly installed into an OSGi runtime? The entries will not have any impact when used without OSGi. +1 The only issue would be the creation of these entries. We have two

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
On Jan 24, 2008 5:36 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 5:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip If this is mainly about reducing the size of the download [snip] No I'm puzzled by this. One of the two

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Laws
Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being distributed are OK. Surely the archive

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Laws
Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being distributed are OK. Surely the archive

Re: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
On Jan 24, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Updating this list with other suggestions gives (added points 6-9): 1) applications to contain only the code and other artifacts required for the application itself not Tuscany internals - simple sca contribution jars 2) some sort

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Raymond Feng
There are two tools in Apache felix can probably help: 1) mangen - OSGi Bundle Manifest generator http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FELIX/Bundle+Manifest+Generator+%28mangen%29 We could use it to create OSGi bundles out of the existing jars. 2) Maven Bundle Plugin 1.2.0 We could use

Re: Size of the binary distribution

2008-01-24 Thread Luciano Resende
On Jan 24, 2008 8:49 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a look at what makes up the size of the binary distribution, here's some details: The 1.1 binary distribution is about 65 Meg, of that 50 Meg is from all the jars in the lib directory, 8.5 Meg is from the calculator webapp

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: [snip] The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B) how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used? Ah I'm happy to see that there are not so many packaging schemes after all :) We've already started to discuss contribution

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Thank you for describing the scenario. It's really helpful to understand how all the pieces work together from a user perspective. I have a few comments inline. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Some more input on steps 7 and 9. I agree with your other comments (snipped out to keep this short). Raymond Feng wrote: [snip] 7. Upload cloud.jar, find deployable composite http://cloud#cloud in it, mark it deployed. The red-x on deployed composite http://store#store is now gone. We

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Raymond Feng
Comments inline. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:11 PM Subject: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes Some more input on steps 7 and 9. I agree

Re: Exception-Fault mapping

2008-01-24 Thread Scott Kurz
Raymond, Thanks for organizing this discussion much better.Responses inline... On Jan 23, 2008 12:44 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Scott. Thank you for bringing this issue up again for discussion. I think the topic is mostly about how to work with WSDL faults in Java.

Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
More comments inline :) Raymond Feng wrote: I'm a bit confused by that your statement in : 6. Mark http://store#store as deployed. Store has a reference to a CurrencyConverter service (from composite http://cloud#cloud which is not in my domain yet) so it shows a red-x and appears disabled.

Build error

2008-01-24 Thread Kevin Williams
Trying to build on a new machine: Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.5.0 I get the following error: Running org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.itests.HelloWorldOMTestCase Jan 24, 2008 12:15:11 PM org.apache.tuscany.sca.http.jetty.JettyServer addServletMapping INFO: Added Servlet

Re: Using security policies in the Bigbank scenario, was Re: Policy Framework Scenarios.

2008-01-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Venkata Krishnan wrote: - Why did you need two authentication and wsAuthentication intents? is it because you needed different policy sets on the client and service side? Yes, that's the reason. Since the policysets encapsulate things like the username, password callback hander etc. which

Re: SCA runtimes

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Laws
On Jan 24, 2008 5:58 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 24, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Updating this list with other suggestions gives (added points 6-9): 1) applications to contain only the code and other artifacts required for the application itself