[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins reassigned TUSCANY-2041:
-
Assignee: Pete Robbins
Repeated nill elements of extended type cause Parser found
Hi Sebastien,
Am yet to look into the Bigbank. Will do it soon. But then, I was able to
get the helloworld-ws-secure samples to work with only abstract intents like
authentication, integrity and not custom ones ;-). The policysets
'appliesTo' was use to target them to specific services /
Sure, thanks Sebastien.
On Feb 12, 2008 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Thanks. I will ask Sebastien then :)
I'm an administrator on project Tuscany but:
- you are not in the Tuscany continuum group
- I don't have seem to have authority to
Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various
SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be
applicable ever.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 2:03 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that page is protected from normal users. It appears blank for me.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 1:50 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, thanks Sebastien.
On Feb 12, 2008 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Thanks. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567999#action_12567999
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-2041:
---
I checked in a fix for this into the
On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkat
A question.
snip...
- In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite
files
so that all definitions.xml file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568011#action_12568011
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
The first block tries to run
snip..
On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various
SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be
applicable ever.
So, in the code today, how do you know you have
Thanks Venkat! That's the approach I'll take.
On Feb 11, 2008 6:07 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Any addition to the tests will be really helpful. To get a
jumpstart you could copy over one of the existing tests and modify it
deleting / adding classes and resources.
Hi,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts further. My comments inline.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 9:51 PM, Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments below.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your observations / suggestions.
Hi,
No there isn't a separate phase. Just that in the current read phase I look
for *.composite files and set those aside in a list without processing them
further. After all artifacts in the contribution have been read I then read
the list of composite URIs, read them and modify them with the
Hi Sebastien,
I have made the changes to the secure-bigbank demo. Let me know if there is
something that looks odd and not practical in a real world scenario.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 8:23 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Dealing
+1 on what Sebastien described. In fact, the refactored code already works
this way.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany web-apps and jUnit
Comments below.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your observations / suggestions. Please see my comments
inline.
I apologize for making them lengthy in the hope that it would trigger more
discussions.
- Venkat
On Feb 7, 2008 1:33
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568126#action_12568126
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
I have applied your 2nd patch, after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajini Sivaram updated TUSCANY-1293:
Attachment: sdo-osgi-export-patch.txt
I have tried to recreate the problem with IBM JDK
This commit seems to be causing problems in continuum and elsewhere, but
not in my env. See comments in the JIRA (1293) Investigating.
On 12/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kelvingoodson
Date: Tue Feb 12 03:13:53 2008
New Revision: 620763
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568085#action_12568085
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1293:
--
I am not clear about 106 outputs ,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568066#action_12568066
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1949:
-
There looks like there is a fix required here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568064#action_12568064
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-257:
Thanks Amita, I took a scan of the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1293.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the patch Rajini.
SDO does not work with OSGi
Fyi, i've added a sandbox module [1] to try out support for Relax WS
interfaces and posted to the Tuscany blog with how to use it:
http://apache-tuscany.blogspot.com/2008/02/tuscany-sca-support-for-relax-ws.html
...ant
[1]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568078#action_12568078
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1293:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568083#action_12568083
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Amita, I get clean build from a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar resolved TUSCANY-257.
-
Resolution: Fixed
resolved at rev 620782
recently added file
Raymond,
Your proposal works for me.
On Feb 4, 2008 11:47 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008
Hi All,
I'm trying to ascertain whether it is possible to specify a policySet
applied to a service which would allow us to replace or augment the
data binding?
The rationale behind this is that we're trying to use a legacy JMS
system as a binding.jms reference, but the TextMessage payload is
Great, thanks Ant - I shall take a look and see :)
On Feb 12, 2008 6:02 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 4:33 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to ascertain whether it is possible to specify a policySet
applied to a service which would
That would be good, there's probably things we could do for databindings as
hinted by Dave in this thread but to start with section 1.6 of the spec does
define a little:
240 bindingType type=binding.jms
241 alwaysProvides=jms
242 mayProvide=atLeastOnce
30 matches
Mail list logo
