Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany community
that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When this
thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions around
it, it must be clear to the wider Apache community that the Tuscany
Simon, that's a good idea. I wish I had captured the output from when it
failed. I removed the plugin and ran mvn validate and this time it
worked fine. I don't know whether to :-) or :-(
This time:
[INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin: checking for
updates from
Simon,
Comments inline.
On 2/25/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rajini
I'm covering old ground here but trying to make sure I'm looking at this
in
the right way.
A - How closely class loading should be related to model resolution, i.e.
options 1 and 2 from previously in this
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon, that's a good idea. I wish I had captured the output from when it
failed. I removed the plugin and ran mvn validate and this time it
worked fine. I don't know whether to :-) or :-(
This time:
[INFO] artifact
Hi,
First, thanks a ton for all the comments / opinions.
I agree, META-INF/services is not the right place for this. I suppose
META-INF is ok because the definitions.xml does contain meta-data about
binding and implementation types. For example, the definitions.xml in the
binding.ws.axis
Hi,
Can the composite file be exposed as a web service to external world.
how can i go about it. can you please guide me.
regards
Sandeep Raman.
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Sandeep Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Can the composite file be exposed as a web service to external world.
how can i go about it. can you please guide me.
regards
Sandeep Raman.
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this
See responses inline below.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
I'm wondering whether it would be good to have a vote about this.
Of the five people who have expressed a view on this so far, four
of them have had a different first preference. In the interests
of making
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think Simon's proposal should work as follows instead of passing the
properties to the createInvoker() call.
public interface Invoker {
InvokerProperties getProperties(); // Contribute properties
}
public class InvokerProperties {
I think we have another case to deal with in bindings like the Axis2
binding, which is the case that the user provides a portType on
interface.wsdl
without a full port.
So the SCDL would look like:
component name=JAXBTestComponent1
implementation.java ...
service...
Sebastien
This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be used.
I'm interested as I'd like to see us open up the contribution service a bit
and provide some interfaces that allow us to operate on contributions (find
artifacts, read artifacts, resolve artifacts etc.) rather
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if
the
Workspace Admin should also be able
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more
items
and tried to organize them in three categories:
A) Contribution workspace (containing installed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12572601#action_12572601
]
Norman Barker commented on TUSCANY-1841:
A workaround is to flatten the wsdl
Simon Laws wrote:
Sebastien
This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be used.
I'm interested as I'd like to see us open up the contribution service a bit
and provide some interfaces that allow us to operate on contributions (find
artifacts, read artifacts, resolve
Please vote to alter the wording of the existing draft Tuscany charter as
discussed in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
to the following
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and
Question:
Way back in October in r589154 SDODataBinding.introspect was changed to
propagate the Java dflt elem QName into the XMLType logical with code that
looks like:
Object logical = dataType.getLogical();
if (logical instanceof XMLType) {
elementName =
The INFRA-400 is now marked as fixed. Could someone with proper
Chinese knowledge/environment give it a quick try and make sure it
works ok.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following up on resolution of an issue that was brought up a while
ago, and
I'm trying ... will wait for the pages to be saved into the database.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:42 PM
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with
The problem is version of derby jar in the samples/testing/tomcat/build.xml
- it is asking for 10.1.2.1
Whereas the derby jar asked for in the rdb/pom.xml is 10.2.20. So when the
user attempts to
run the sample the required version is not found and no derby jar is
deployed in tomcat lib
and so no
Sounds too good !
Trying now.
Thank you,
David
2008/2/27, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying ... will wait for the pages to be saved into the database.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for the suggestion. Going by the ProviderExtesionPoint way...
- first I'd prefer load the definitions.xml instead of creating
programmatically so that we don't have to touch the code for every change to
the definitions.
- every module that has its own definitions.xml must
22 matches
Mail list logo
