[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583555#action_12583555
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2166:
-
For this to work, I
The buildpath configured by the Tuscany plugin causes issues on Windows,
as it currently places all the runtime JARs on the path of the Eclipse
library created for the Tuscany runtime, and that path then exceeds the
length of the Windows command line (preventing programs to be launched
from a
Cleanup SCA Sample dependencies
---
Key: TUSCANY-2167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2167
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2
Reporter: Luciano
I'd like to get the following JIRAs fixed before we cut the Java SCA
1.2 RC3. This should give us a much better release candidate, and
possible our last one. I'm currently working on TUSCANY-2167, and it
looks like Sebastien might be getting TUSCANY-2146 ready... so any
help with TUSCANY-2150 and
I have just created a Release Status and RC plans thread, we can
discuss the plans to cut the next rc there.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The buildpath configured by the Tuscany plugin causes issues on Windows,
as it currently places all the
I have created TUSCANY-2167 to track this issue, and I'm now
evaluating our calculator sample, and calculator-webapp sample to see
where all the dependencies are coming from. One thing I noticed is
that policy-xml is bringing a lot of ws-security related dependencies
to these applications, and I'm
Incorrect level of commons-httpclient in distribution
-
Key: TUSCANY-2168
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2168
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583587#action_12583587
]
Adriano Crestani commented on TUSCANY-1659:
---
These failures have nothing to do
Saxon download does not work when you are not using the default Maven local
repository directory
Key: TUSCANY-2169
URL:
Hi,
First of all, I would like to thank the tuscany community for the massive
support given me to improve my proposal. I applied the modifications
recommended in this thread. I updated the wiki page[1] and the Google Web
App.
Hopefully this will be the finalized proposal. But your ideas and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-2166.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN revision 642941. Eclipse projects now
Luciano Resende wrote:
I'd like to get the following JIRAs fixed before we cut the Java SCA
1.2 RC3. This should give us a much better release candidate, and
possible our last one. I'm currently working on TUSCANY-2167, and it
looks like Sebastien might be getting TUSCANY-2146 ready... so any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583607#action_12583607
]
Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2169:
--
There are a few problems:
* Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2169.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN revision 642939
Saxon download does not work when
On 3/27/08, Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I'm getting the multi-threading thing, could you say a bit
more about it?
--
Jean-Sebastien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thread 1 and thread 2 call ContributionService.contribute. Each
contribution contains a
Synchronizing the access to SCADefinitions
--
Key: TUSCANY-2170
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2170
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583638#action_12583638
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2170:
--
The current implementation
Hi Ramkumar,
Welcome to Tuscany! Yes, this is a good simple start. Please go ahead and
create a JIRA for this. Also would like to see you discuss the alternatives
you have in mind for this.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/08,
Thanks for your reply.
This example proposal is a good reference on how GSoC application
should look like.
I've made major changes to my proposal, but some paragraphs still
requires some attention:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Apache+Tuscany+CORBA+support%2C+GSoC+proposal
I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail
bounced back. Can someone tell me if this is the right e-mail address?
Thanks in advance.
++Vamsi
Here is a strange problem I am running into.
I have a conversational service with all the operations returning void.
When I use binding.sca, my test runs fine. But, when I change the binding
to binding.ws, I hit an org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException: Target fault
type cannot be resolved: null.
binding.sca bindingType in definitions.xml not used if SCA binding is created
during build phase
Key: TUSCANY-2171
URL:
Removing a contribution that has a definitions.xml file leaves the definitions
in place
---
Key: TUSCANY-2172
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2172
Adriano,
All these formats are only allowed for convenience of entry. When a date
is serialized it is converted to the canonical format. Take a look at
class ModelFactoryImpl:
public String convertDateToString(Object instanceValue)
{
if (instanceValue == null)
{
return null;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-2171:
Assignee: Venkatakrishnan
binding.sca bindingType in definitions.xml not used
Luciano Resende wrote:
If Mark is willing to check the missing files, +1 for the updates. I
do find this useful from time to time.
I also agree that developers should configure their IDE and SVN to
proper add the tags and any necessary SVN properties to make this
work.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail
bounced back. Can someone tell me if this is the right e-mail address?
Thanks in advance.
++Vamsi
Vamsi,
While the archives of all OASIS technical committee mail lists are
public, subscription to the mail lists
Add style formatter and template information to website Coding Guidelines
---
Key: TUSCANY-2173
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2173
Project: Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583714#action_12583714
]
Venkatakrishnan commented on TUSCANY-2171:
--
I've been trying to see how this can
I've just committed fixes for TUSCANY-1948 and TUSCANY-1974 to trunk in
r643022, r643023 and r643024, the changes seem ok from the testing i've done
so how about including these in 1.2?
...ant
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd like to get the
Luciano Resende wrote:
I have created TUSCANY-2167 to track this issue, and I'm now
evaluating our calculator sample, and calculator-webapp sample to see
where all the dependencies are coming from. One thing I noticed is
that policy-xml is bringing a lot of ws-security related dependencies
to
Thanks Mike.
++Vamsi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail
bounced back. Can someone tell me if this is the right e-mail address?
Thanks in advance.
++Vamsi
Vamsi,
I don't think this has been mentioned on tuscany-dev before so FYI - there's
now a draft of the SCA JEE spec available on the OSOA website at :
http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_JAVAEE_integration_v0_9.pdf?version=1
Lots of interesting things in there, anyone interested in helping
Hi,
I'm fixing TUSCANY-2150 now.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:59 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA 1.2] Release Status and RC plans
Luciano Resende wrote:
I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2150:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
samples/helloworld-ws-servicereference-jms
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I agree with that and having recently spent time helping people new to
Tuscany and seen the problems they've had I think it would be much more
helpful to fail. Could we have a lenient mode which can be used when
debugging in
Kevin Williams wrote:
I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not
a direct mapping from line number to compliance point. A compliance
point may cover n lines or a single line may have n compliance points.
In that case you could produce a separate compliance document
Wojtek Janiszewski wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
This example proposal is a good reference on how GSoC application
should look like.
I've made major changes to my proposal, but some paragraphs still
requires some attention:
Hi Ant,
In this JIRA, you added a comments that this was little risky, how
comfortable are you with adding this into SCA 1.2 ? Have you tested
this with other webapps and no side effects ?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed fixes for
Not risky - just that when I added the fix to the jira I'd not done much
testing at all other than to confirm it fixed the problem, i've done a bit
more testing now and all the samples i've tried seem ok. I'm away right now
so cant try every sample and demo we have though sorry.
...ant
On
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Adriano Crestani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean you're
working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers to help
fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2150.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r643083 (1.2 branch) and r643081 (trunk)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583772#action_12583772
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2171:
-
A simpler fix is to
Hi,
I fixed TUSCANY-2150 in both 1.2 branch and trunk. I had to work around an
Axis2 issue too (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3685).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:54 AM
To:
Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and noticed that some
files have a @version containing the SVN revision number in their JavaDoc
headers but others do not.
As an example, @version might look like:
/**
* Some JavaDoc for the class
*
* @version
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and noticed that some
files have a @version containing the SVN revision number in their
JavaDoc
headers but others do not.
ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Combellack wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking through the Tuscany source code and noticed that some
files have a @version containing the SVN revision number in their
JavaDoc
headers but others
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2146:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Array index out of range in binding-notification sample
Hi Folks,
+1 for warnings when the application is developed. +1 for Errors when
you put the application into production. The trick is to know the
difference
between deployment for UT vs. deployment for real.
:-)
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2146.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r643103 (1.2) and r643102 (trunk)
Array index out of range
I already have my IDE set up to add the headers automatically for a while.
I'm +1 on Mark's proposal as he's volunteering :-). My stance is that this
header is nice to have but not mandatory.
BTW, this header is updated by SVN (not by developers) whenever a commit is
made. Please see:
I fixed TUSCANY-2146 too.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:59 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA 1.2] Release Status and RC plans
Luciano Resende wrote:
I'd like to
scabooz wrote:
Hi Folks,
+1 for warnings when the application is developed. +1 for Errors when
you put the application into production. The trick is to know the
difference
between deployment for UT vs. deployment for real.
:-)
Dave
And the other trick is to allow processing of
Hi, I am seeing an issue where @OneWay operations over binding.ws are not
having the parameters serialized properly. I tried to verify that an iTest
existed for this case but found that the oneway iTest appears not to be
operational and it wouldn't catch the problem that I am seeing. From
Yep. Deployment for UT usually involves all the traditional
IT roles, just in development mode. By the time the
application gets through its initial lifecycle phases, subsequent
lifecycle phases need to be more strict. The admin role
early in the lifecycle should be very lenient as you said.
Policy related test cases should be moved to a policy iTest module
--
Key: TUSCANY-2174
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2174
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2168:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Incorrect level of commons-httpclient in distribution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2168.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r643144 in 1.2 branch.
Incorrect level of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Zhou reopened TUSCANY-1840:
Reopening this issue and Richard will add more information into the JIRA.
Bootstrapping a subset
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583855#action_12583855
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2169:
---
The donwload ant task is a workaround as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583868#action_12583868
]
Richard Mah commented on TUSCANY-1840:
--
We only wish to bootstrap parts of Tuscany
Plugin does properly log errors and release its progress monitor
Key: TUSCANY-2175
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2175
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
scabooz wrote:
Yep. Deployment for UT usually involves all the traditional
IT roles, just in development mode. By the time the
application gets through its initial lifecycle phases, subsequent
lifecycle phases need to be more strict. The admin role
early in the lifecycle should be very
I committed fixes for annoying issues with the plugin (TUSCANY-2175) in
trunk SVN revision 643158.
It's a no risk fix so I'd like to merge it into the 1.2 branch if possible.
Let me know. Thanks.
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583883#action_12583883
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2175:
-
I committed fixes for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-2175:
Summary: Plugin does not properly log errors and release its progress
Sure, go ahead. I looked into the commit logs and it looks ok and very isolated.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I committed fixes for annoying issues with the plugin (TUSCANY-2175) in
trunk SVN revision 643158.
It's a no risk fix so I'd like
Hi,
The message is a bit misleading and it complains that a fault from WS stack
cannot be mapped to a java checked exception. The cause of your issue is:
Caused by: org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: An unknown message label has been
encountered: In
at
Hi,
Following Jean-Sebastien's comments I've added a Use case to my draft
proposal for the Integrate Google services in SCA compositions GSoc08
project. I also revised the deliverables to make sure they were aligned with
the overall idea. The proposal can be found at:
implementation-ejb JARs missing from assembly
-
Key: TUSCANY-2176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2176
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Incorrect dependencies in tutorial not reported by admin
-
Key: TUSCANY-2177
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2177
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Oscar,
The proposal is really good. It look likes what I was trying to do a week
ago. Unfortunately, I had no success yet on running the calculator sample on
SCA due to a lot of Android platform limitations has and a poor support from
Android community : (
But for sure, with your help, we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-2177.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Incorrect dependencies in tutorial not reported by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-2176.
-
Resolution: Fixed
implementation-ejb JARs missing from assembly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1659.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on revision 643224.
I created a SDOSimpleDateFormat that
Hi Ant,
The bug is fixed on revision 643224 ; )
Adriano Crestani
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:56 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Adriano Crestani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean
you're
76 matches
Mail list logo
