Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating or 1.1-incubating the WSDL generated is
as expected. This problem only appears to have started recently with
1.2.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:40
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing this is
something to do with the continuum builds but does anyone know for sure? If
so
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
+1. Many of the items suggested for 2.0 have previously been the
subject of discussions that have not been easy to close. Until
we have agreement on how to approach these things, I think it's
better for 2.0
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing
this is
something
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lou Amodeo wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references target=
attribute
as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object.
This request is based on a requirement to
Yes, for sure I would like to mentor other proposals. Need to say,
though, that I am not fully aware of the responsibilities and
implications of being a mentor at the GSoC. So, it would be good if I
get some information about this.
Regards,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Some null guards needed in MediatorImpl
---
Key: TUSCANY-2217
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2217
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime
Endpoint URI resolution precedence for binding.ws reference is incorrect
Key: TUSCANY-2218
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2218
Project: Tuscany
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating or 1.1-incubating the WSDL generated is
as expected. This problem only appears to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-2217:
Attachment: 2217.patch
Some null guards needed in MediatorImpl
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws,
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws, when I use wsdl2java
with this wsdl I get the following exception:
IWAB0399E Error in
Patch support wsjar in host embedded
--
Key: TUSCANY-2219
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2219
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Embedded Runtime
I uncommented the lines in this code
protected Port createPort(Definition definition, Binding binding,
Service service) throws WSDLException {
Port port = definition.createPort();
port.setBinding(binding);
configurePort(definition, port, binding);
/*
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I uncommented the lines in this code
protected Port createPort(Definition definition, Binding binding,
Service service) throws WSDLException {
Port port = definition.createPort();
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating or 1.1-incubating the WSDL generated is
as expected. This problem only appears to
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating or
Hi Jean-Sebastien, all,
Thanks for your comments.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The proposal looks pretty good to me. I have a few comments/questions:
- Are you going to have tools to create SCA contributions,
imports/exports, contribution
Hey Simon,
Thanks for investigating this so quickly!
I shall raise the JIRA as requested now.
Dave.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave
WSDL representations of binding.ws generated incorrectly.
-
Key: TUSCANY-2220
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Simon,
The JIRA issue can be found at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220
Cheers,
Dave.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the
Hi,
I buy in this case as it's an issue around the lazy loading.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 8:02 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: A solution to avoid
In the spec of Java Common Annotations and APIs
(http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_JavaAnnotationsAndAPIs_V100.pdf?version=1),
line 1710-1711 says
1710 @ConversationID
1711 private String ConversationID;
I tried and got following warning:
Apr 11, 2008 11:50:37 AM
Hi, Simon.
You had so many responses on this thread and I had to find the right one to
reply :-).
1) IIRC, it was me who commented out the code to set the soap:address as I
was getting some problems with the empty location URI. Ideally the uri
should from the binding.uri. To make that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588026#action_12588026
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2220:
-
Commit r633216 made changes to
Hi,
My understanding is that it's bug in the spec for the sample. The same spec
says:
502 1.6.6. Conversations ID
503
504 If a protected or public field or setter method is annotated with
@ConversationID, then the conversation
505 ID for the conversation is injected onto the field
Thanks,
Hi,
There is an Apache template available too at
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:56 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Setting the SVN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2219:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Patch support wsjar in host embedded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2219.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r647238. Thank you for the contribution!
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2217:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Some null guards needed in MediatorImpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2085:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
ConcurentModExc in DefaultDataBindingExtensionPoint
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588055#action_12588055
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2085:
---
To achieve the same purpose as Scott
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2085.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under rr647242. Thanks for the patch.
ConcurentModExc in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2217.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r647246. Thanks for the patch.
Some null guards
The one we have in our SVN handles Tuscany special files and other
properties as well :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/etc/svn-config
We also have a SVN ignores file
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/etc/svn-ignores
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:30
New tests for Java @Scope annotaion
Key: TUSCANY-2221
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2221
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
Hi, Giorgio.
Thank you for looking into this. I would like to extend your proposal to
cover the binary data support for binding.ws.
1) JAXB mapping rules for binary data
java.awt.Image -- xs:base64Binary
javax.activation.DataHandler -- xs:base64Binary
javax.xml.transform.Source --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gilbert Kwan updated TUSCANY-2221:
--
Attachment: vtest.scope.zip
TUSCANY-2221.test.patch
New tests for Java
Some information available at the ASF GSoC wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCodeMentor
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Antollini, Mario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, for sure I would like to mentor other proposals. Need to say,
though, that I am not fully aware of the
This was created to allow users to keep downloading nightly builds for
test verification purposes when we were having a period of not so
stable builds on the continuum machine.
I guess I'm fine with removing. Although a more secure approach would
be to add this task to a profile that would be run
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:28 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
+1. Many of the items suggested for 2.0 have previously been the
subject of discussions that have not been easy to close. Until
we have
Missing Documentation for new binding
--
Key: TUSCANY-
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Documentation
44 matches
Mail list logo
