Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
I modified a working test to initialize a property from the component type file
rather than the .composite and the test now fails
Well Mike, you broke a working test! :-)
I tried your suggestion and initializing the property via the
component type file does not seem to work. I opened T-2390.
--Kevin
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just make the
Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Lines 450-451 of the Assembly spec:
The componentType element can contain Service elements, Reference elements
and Property elements.
I defined a test that inspects an injected property value. In the initial
version I defined
The vtest contributors get credit for this pattern! :-) We also have
a Ruby script that scans the test source and, among other things,
lists ignored tests and the associated blocking Jiras.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:43 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2375.
---
Resolution: Fixed
vtest to test generated wsdl
Since the vtest script assumes a test comment structure around
specification line numbers, I created a new script specific to this
purpose and added it to /java/etc. It scans for files named
*testCase.java and collects methods annotated with @Ignore.
I could use some help getting this automated
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Lines 450-451 of the Assembly spec:
The componentType element can contain Service elements, Reference elements and
Property elements.
I defined a test that inspects an injected property value
Congratulations Scott!
--Kevin
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Antollini, Mario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Scott. Welcome!
Mario
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ant
elder
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:49 AM
To: tuscany-dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2375:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
vtest to test generated wsdl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2367:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
vtest for binding.ws with promoted services
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2367.
---
Resolution: Fixed
vtest for binding.ws with promoted services and references
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2364:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Release vtest atService7 of ServiceAnnotationTestCase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2363.
---
Resolution: Fixed
vtest for soap version and multi soap bindings of binding.ws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2363:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
vtest for soap version and multi soap bindings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2364.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Release vtest atService7 of ServiceAnnotationTestCase
Great news Vamsi! Welcome.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations! You are well deserved.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2348:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
vTest for ws binding without a WSDL document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2348.
---
Resolution: Fixed
vTest for ws binding without a WSDL document
I am unable to get to:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home and it
fails with 502 Proxy Error. Anyone else seeing this?
--
Kevin
Its back up! Thanks.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like...
http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am unable to get to:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
I would like to add a vtest section to our website that explains the
purpose and structure of the subproject and also provides current
specification-test method mapping info. I have added the proposed
content on our staging wiki here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/J1MB
I welcome any
Since the runtime does not provide a spec-compliant API for non-SCA
clients to look up services, vtest test clients should now be using
the vtest-provided ServiceFinder wrapper class. There is a small
handful of vtests still using the Tuscany-specific APIs such as those
provided by SCADomain and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597491#action_12597491
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2247:
-
Leaving this open until resolution
Hi Everyone,
I would like to produce an XML version of the javadoc output so I can
more easily process it further. Has anyone had experience with the
maven jellydoc plugin XMLDoclet?
Thanks,
--Kevin
And mine...
+1
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Here is my +1
Yours, Mike.
ant elder wrote:
Restarting the graduation vote with the updated proposal words, please
vote
on the proposal below to graduate Tuscany to a TLP.
+1 from me.
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
The Java CAA spec states:
/**
* Lines 728-732
* p
* By default, the client component of a service is assumed to be the
* callback service for the bidirectional service. However
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Lines 650-654 of the Java CAA specification state:
The difference for stateless services is that the callback field would not be
available if the component is servicing a request
-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Lines 650-654 of the Java CAA specification state:
The difference for stateless services is that the callback field would
not be available if the component is servicing a request for anything other
than the original client. So, the technique
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
The Java CAA spec says the following re: stateless callbacks:
613 A stateless callback interface is a callback whose interface is not marked
as conversational. Unlike
614 stateless services
Vamsi,
Thanks for your contribution to the vtest bucket for @Init and
@Destroy annotations. Can you say why you do not use the SCADomain
APIs to configure the domain and locate services from the test client?
I would like to keep this pattern consistent throughout the entire
suite.
--
Kevin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12594329#action_12594329
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2286:
-
I applied the latest patch OK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2286.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I am closing this but would like to see the test case converted to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2287.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing this but would like to see it converted to use the SCADomain
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
From Lines 534, 535 of the Java API/Annotaitons spec:
Callbacks may be used for both remotable and local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2284:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2284.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593632#action_12593632
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2286:
-
Thanks for contributing this test
: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
I inadvertently marked a private field with @Callback and received the
following warning:
WARNING: Invalid annotation
: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
The Java APIs and Annotations spec states:
487 A conversation ends, and any state associated with the conversation is
freed up, when:
...
492 • Any non-business exception is thrown
Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
I have a failing test from this part of the Java API /Annotation specification:
475 Conversations start on the client side when one of the following occur:
476 • A @Reference to a conversational service
I am receiving the following when trying to commit:
C:\tuscanysvn\java\sca\vtest\java-api\conversationsvn commit -m
First conversation lifetime testcase
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
'/repos/asf/!svn/act/e7bafbee-7404-e14a-8c00-eeaf64af1923': 403
Forbidden
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2276.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing because I mis-read the spec. Specifically, line 478 says
+1 from me too.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
++Vamsi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:46 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've done a lot of work since last October. We now have a diverse
community
of contributors and have
Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
The atScope1 vTest fails intermittently like this:
---
T E S T S
---
Running
component?
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Kevin Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The current JUnit tests (iTest and vTest) make use of the
non-standard
SCADomain.getService API to get a handle to an SCA service. Are
there
any plans to provide an API
I am adding a test to verify @ConversationalAttributes
(SinglePrincipal = true). Here is the related text from the Java
API/Annot specification:
1669 • singlePrincipal (optional) – If true, only the principal
(the user) that started the conversation has
1670 authority to continue the
patterned this test after the Calculator-policy sample but I
think I am missing some piece of configuration. Any help is
appreciated.
Thanks,
--Kevin
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am adding a test to verify @ConversationalAttributes
(SinglePrincipal
I reported an intermittent failure like this a few days ago. Are you
seeing this consistently?
--
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I'm getting a vtest failure in my latest builds - any explanation?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2263:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Updates to Exception's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2264:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2263.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to Exception's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to RequestContext's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2249.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to ComponentContext's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2257:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Update and add tests to @Scope vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2257.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Update and add tests to @Scope vtest
: Java SCA Verification Tests
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Add vtest content for Java API/Annotation Spec section 1.6 - Conversations and
Async
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2247:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
vtest content for Java API spec - Conversation/Async
We are moving through the Java API and Annotations specification
pretty well in vTest and I am wondering if we should start on section
2 which covers policy annotations. Are we supporting this section of
the specification?
--
Kevin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2244:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Updates to ServiceReference's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2244.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Updates to ServiceReference's vtest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2238.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Test Cases for Exception APIs
I ran into this same problem last night when trying to apply this
patch. I wonder if YK's patch tool is having trouble with adds. I
remember the Subclipse tooling having a similar issue.
As a workaround, I have found zip files of entirely new folders to be
easy to integrate and commit.
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2234:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
More tests for section 1.8 of SCA Java Annotations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2234.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
More tests for section 1.8 of SCA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2230:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams (was: Simon Laws)
Test Cases for RequestContext API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2230.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I noticed the following empty test method in the RequestContext test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2231.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Test Cases for CallableReference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2232:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Test Cases for ServiceReference API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2233:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Test Cases for Conversation API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2232.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Test Cases for ServiceReference API
I am seeing an infrequent, intermittent failure in one of the @Scope vtests:
GService-destroyGService
Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.281
sec FAILURE!
atScope1(org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.annotations.scope.ScopeAnnotationTestCase)
Time elapsed: 1.203
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2233.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Test Cases for Conversation API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams updated TUSCANY-2238:
Component/s: Java SCA Verification Tests
Test Cases for Exception APIs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams reassigned TUSCANY-2238:
---
Assignee: Kevin Williams
Test Cases for Exception APIs
Hi YK,
Your patch files always seem to include duplicate entries.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Yee-Kang Chang (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yee-Kang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2221.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
New tests for Java @Scope annotaion
The Specification is inconsistent since:
504 If a *protected* or *public* field or setter method is
annotated with @ConversationID, then the conversation
505 ID for the conversation is injected onto the field ...
My guess is that the example has a typo and should actually be:
1710
Hi Ant,
Sorry for causing any confusion. Let me know if you'd like any more
explanation. I'll be checking mail sporadically the next several
days.
--Kevin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:04 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answering my own email...I guess its this thread which just doesn't
Hi Yee-Kang,
Further down in the specification is:
435 The second variant, which takes an additional serviceName
parameter, *must* be used if the component
436 implements multiple services.
So, an exception is expected if you employ the first version of the
createSelfReference API.
I meant to say:
... an exception is expected if you use the first version of the
createSelfReference API to create a ServiceReference to a component
offering multiple services.
--
Kevin
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yee-Kang,
Further down
Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Placeholder for tracking additions to the @Reference vtests
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Attachments: ComponentContext.zip, ComponentContext20080404.zip
Contributions for ComponentContext API testing can be attached here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585208#action_12585208
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2188:
-
Regarding: What is the different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-2188.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
New tests for Java @Service
to this effort. Thanks!
Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/19/2008 01:40 PM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Verification Testing
I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for
verification
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Contributions for ComponentContext API testing can be attached here
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Assignee: Kevin Williams
New tests for Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification of @Service
annotation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
The Java AnnotationsAPIs specification Lines 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410 ...
* References may also be injected via public setter methods even when
the
* @Reference annotation is not present. However, the @Reference
The current JUnit tests (iTest and vTest) make use of the non-standard
SCADomain.getService API to get a handle to an SCA service. Are there
any plans to provide an API to get a ComponentContext as outlined by
the SCA Java Annotations and APIs specification? I would like to
stick to stick to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584742#action_12584742
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2188:
-
Thanks Gilbert! I'll take a look
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Line 1635 of the Java Annotations spec says:
A @Service annotation with no attributes is meaningless, it is the same as
not having the annotation there at all.
However, the presence
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584783#action_12584783
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2188:
-
Gilbert, this looks great and I just
I have added a new jira component named Java SCA Verification Tests
and I will start opening issues for specific areas of the Java
Annotations and APIs specification that require testing.
Thanks,
--Kevin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I would like to add page to our wiki devoted to vtest development. I
see this as a place where we can provide a mapping from the
specification set to specific test buckets and also as a place to
track progress.
Any thoughts?
--
Kevin
/TUSCANY-2165
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
The Java AnnotationsAPIs specification Lines 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410
, as there is no
compliance test or a clear compliance definition on the spec, your
annotations around this area might be controversial.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not
a direct mapping
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: Kevin Williams
Priority: Minor
SCADomain.getService() currently returns a proxy even when the component name
passed is not in the domain.
I have
Comment inline ...
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice most every Tuscany component has JUnit tests associated with
it. I also notice that these tests are run as part of a normal Maven
build (which you can turn on and off via -Dmaven.test.skip=true).
,
--Kevin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific
functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do
this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions
?
Thanks,
--Kevin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
++Vamsi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for
verification testing against
1 - 100 of 477 matches
Mail list logo