Hi ,
I am trying to summarize some updates on progress in XQuery DAS -
extended the Service Provider framework to support invocation of
different XQuery Implementations.
Open Issues:-
I am considering 2 alternative XQuery Implementations
1) DB2 Express
- here my main concern is, is it possible
Comments inline
On 7/18/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ,
I am trying to summarize some updates on progress in XQuery DAS -
extended the Service Provider framework to support invocation of
different XQuery Implementations.
Open Issues:-
I am considering 2 alternative XQuery
Gang, how is XPath support implemented today? I've looked at the code
briefly in the past, but couldn't make sense of it. I was hoping that
XPath support came from the Xalan jar files. If that were true, it would
be a SMOP to replace the Xalan XPath libraries with the Saxon libraries.
Saxon
Some comments inline...
BTW, if you have started anything, feel free to start submitting
patches and I can apply those to my sandbox. This way others, and
myself, can give better comments.
On 7/12/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am just trying to get the discussion
Hi,
Need some help marked with #.
In the implementation of XQuery DAS, I am trying to start simple and then
gather requirements and features on the way and keep building.
#For the first attempt, I am trying with sourceforge's XQEngine as the
XQuery engine, as it has no license restrictions. Has
Unfortunately it looks like XQEngine is GPL so unusable, we can't even have
code using it in SVN. The only alternative i can think of is Saxon, maybe
others know of something else?
...ant
On 6/21/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Need some help marked with #.
In the
Hi All,
After a while on RDB DAS beta1 , I am trying to do more on XQuery DAS.
Tried to check different XQuery implementations available, below is summary:
http://www.axyana.com///products.html Quizx/open - open source
Quizx/db(XQuest) - not open source
http://www.gnu.org/software/qexo/ -
Hi Amita
Related to the features, I think it's fine to start simple and get
improvements gradatively as we progress...
Some issues that you have identified:
- Config model more flexible to accommodate differences between
multiple implementation
- Factory issues, and the ability to get
