Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Raymond Feng wrote: > Thank for applying the patch. > > Here's one more patch addressing several issues I discovered recently. > > 1) Fix a preifx/namespace mapping issue when a unqualified local element > is loaded > 2) Fix a duplicate START_DOCUMENT issue with XMLDocumentStreamReader > 3) Fix t

Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support

2006-06-21 Thread Raymond Feng
al Message - From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support Jeremy Boynes wrote: Frank Budinsky wrote: I can't seem to find the cycles to look at this right now

Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Frank Budinsky wrote: > >>I can't seem to find the cycles to look at this right now, so in the >>interest of getting something going here can some other StAX-savvy >>committer (maybe Jeremy) take a look at Raymond's patch and commit it if >>it looks like a reasonable star

Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Frank Budinsky wrote: > I can't seem to find the cycles to look at this right now, so in the > interest of getting something going here can some other StAX-savvy > committer (maybe Jeremy) take a look at Raymond's patch and commit it if > it looks like a reasonable start.? We can then look at ad

Re: [PATCH] More improvements to SDO/StAX support

2006-06-21 Thread Frank Budinsky
I can't seem to find the cycles to look at this right now, so in the interest of getting something going here can some other StAX-savvy committer (maybe Jeremy) take a look at Raymond's patch and commit it if it looks like a reasonable start.? We can then look at addressing the issues (e.g., su