Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-10 Thread Andrew Borley
Hi Jean-Sebastien, The Axis docs specify the following: libxml2-2.6.20 zlib-1.2.3 iconv-1.9.1 what happens when you upgrade to these levels? Also, what linux distro version are you using? Thanks Andy On 7/9/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Borley wrote: Hi,

Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Andrew Borley wrote: Hi Jean-Sebastien, The Axis docs specify the following: libxml2-2.6.20 zlib-1.2.3 iconv-1.9.1 what happens when you upgrade to these levels? Also, what linux distro version are you using? Thanks Andy On 7/9/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-10 Thread Pete Robbins
Thanks for trying this out. We will add the prereq info to the documentation. Andy, as you are working on the doc ... ;-) Cheers, -- Pete

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-08 Thread Pete Robbins
There are obviously some problems in the install and run doc + some bugs so I thinke we need to fix these problems and re-spin the candidate. Please continue to find problems... it is much appreciated. Cheers, -- Pete

Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-08 Thread Andrew Borley
Hi, This looks like everything is working fine aside from the final conversion of DataObject to Axiom doc before it gets returned - what versions of Axis2C, libxml, iconv and zlib do you have? I'll try to replicate your set-up. Cheers Andy On 7/8/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-08 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Andrew Borley wrote: Hi, This looks like everything is working fine aside from the final conversion of DataObject to Axiom doc before it gets returned - what versions of Axis2C, libxml, iconv and zlib do you have? I'll try to replicate your set-up. Cheers Andy On 7/8/06, Jean-Sebastien

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread ant elder
I think the 72 hours is a minimum not an exact amount of time, the vote can keep running until you've got the necessary number of binding +1s. Its also not great that a large part of this will be over a weekend so you may end up needing to wait a bit longer. I'm far from being a C++ expert so so

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Pete Robbins
yup.. .the vote will run until it stops ;-) I'll be around on the mailing list but not IRC. Thanks for looking at it. Cheers, On 07/07/06, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the 72 hours is a minimum not an exact amount of time, the vote can keep running until you've got the

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Geoffrey Winn
I'll be around on the mailing list but not IRC. Me too. Geoff.

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Edward Slattery
Ive downloaded and run the sca , sdo and Calculator sample. I used first the command line build, then visual studio 6 then visual studio 7 - all ran and produced a working sample. This gets a +1 from me. There are two minor issues which I would *not* consider as important enough for a respin:

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Luciano Resende
Just one quick question... are we going to make the final C++ M1 Release as a non-debug build ? - Luciano On 7/7/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ive downloaded and run the sca , sdo and Calculator sample. I used first the command line build, then visual studio 6 then visual

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Pete Robbins
On 07/07/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just one quick question... are we going to make the final C++ M1 Release as a non-debug build ? I think we probably should ultimately make the bin release a non-debug build. For this release I'm not sure. If enough folk think it's

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: On 07/07/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just one quick question... are we going to make the final C++ M1 Release as a non-debug build ? I think we probably should ultimately make the bin release a non-debug build. For this

Re: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: On 07/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:I'm trying the Linux binary distribution and running into the following issues: - The INSTALL files for both the SDO and SCA distributions just say Extract the binary tar package to

Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: On 07/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:I'm trying the Linux binary distribution and running into the following issues: - The INSTALL files for both the SDO and SCA distributions just say

Re: Problem with C++ web service sample, was: [VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-07 Thread Pete Robbins
It looks like the ws call is getting into the component and that is working fine. The error is when we are trying to convert the dataobject returned from the calculator sample to an axiom object before returning it over the wire. I haven't seen this behaviour before. Before starting the axis

[VOTE] Publish Tuscany C++ M1 release

2006-07-06 Thread Pete Robbins
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here: http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1 The code is tagged in svn: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-0.1.incubating-M1/ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-0.1.incubating-M1/%C2%A0 Please