+1
On 04/03/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
+1
- Venkat
On 3/4/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
With my spec hat on - the NAMES of the specs ain't going to change.
However, some of the FILES belonging to the spec are VERY likely to
change before publication. I know FOR SURE that sca-core.xsd is
going to change from the
+1
--
Jeremy
On Mar 3, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
I think Sebastien's comments about the naming are a valid one, what are we
going to call when the spec 1.0 get released ? Other then that, +1.
On 3/6/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
Jeremy
On Mar 3, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Please vote to approve the release
The naming convention is that used by other Apache projects that
provide independent implementations of spec APIs:
* r1.0 in the artifactId refers to the revision of the spec
* 1.0-incubating in the version refers to our release
If the spec changes their version number between now and final
).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.0-incubating version of sca-api-r1.0
The naming convention is that used by other Apache projects that provide
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think we used r0.95 in M2 but SCA spec 0.95 was published in that
case. Now we use r1.0 ahead of the official SCA 1.0 spec. If we feel
1.0.1-incubating could be used to fix minor issuesin our release to
catch up the final SCA 1.0 if there are any changes, I'm
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I think we used r0.95 in M2 but SCA spec 0.95 was published in that
case. Now we use r1.0 ahead of the official SCA 1.0 spec. If we
feel 1.0.1-incubating could be used to fix minor issuesin our
release to catch up the final SCA 1.0 if
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Putting my spec hat on, I can pretty confidently say the chances of
content changes to the specs are remote at best. I'd characterize
'remote' as the possibility of getting 20 lawyers together and
having them agree on something that generates
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Putting my spec hat on, I can pretty confidently say the chances
of content changes to the specs are remote at best. I'd
characterize 'remote' as the possibility of getting 20 lawyers
+1
Thanks
On 3/3/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
+1
Thanks
On 3/3/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
+1 Jim
On Mar 3, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/
spec/sca-api-r1.0/1.0-incubating
[src]
15 matches
Mail list logo
