[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2347) Removing the exception throws from the processors

2008-06-13 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2347: --- Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam) Removing the exception throws from the

Re: [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2347) Removing the exception throws from the processors

2008-05-29 Thread Ramkumar R
Hi Mike, Thanks for raising this, I believe we need more detailed discussion on this topic with the community and its important that we all agree upon. Simon has started a new thread in the ML to discuss about this and here is the link to same...

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2347) Removing the exception throws from the processors

2008-05-28 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2347: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam Removing the exception throws from the

Re: [jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2347) Removing the exception throws from the processors

2008-05-28 Thread Mike Edwards
Ramkumar, Is this such a wise move?? What is the point of allowing processing to continue if the model is actually broken in some way? I would agree that there may be some exceptions that can be removed and replaced by the logging of messages, but is it really wise to allow the creation of a