[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Yoder closed TUSCANY-1368.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved with applied patch.
> C++ SDO portability: class interface Type off-spec enum values
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1368
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1368
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification
> Affects Versions: Cpp-M3
> Reporter: Michael Yoder
> Fix For: Cpp-Next
>
> Attachments: TUSCANY-1368.txt
>
>
> C++ SDO specification class interface Type has enum values
> ("OpenDataObjectType", "num_type")which are not in the specification, and are
> being used externally by SCA. It would seem that for SDO portability these
> should be taken internal to SDO or submitted to the spec committee.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:21 AM
> To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SDO spec compliance/portability: Type enums
> the num_type is just a convenient way to know the extent of an enum and is
> common practice. I guess the OpenDataObjectType must be a Tuscany specific
> extension to handle open types. I'd need to do some research to determine if
> this is missing from the spec or can be removed.
> Please raise a Jira for the renaming of IntegerType.
> It may be useful to raise Jiras for all these issues so we can track them.
> Cheers,
> On 21/06/07, Michael Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Tuscany SDO C++ class Type::Types enum has these values which do
> > not appear in the C++ 2.1 specification:
> >
> > - OpenDataObjectType
> > - num_type
> >
> > Would it be appropriate to file a bug to remove the additional values?
> > Or alternatively a bug for them to be
> > submitted to the spec committee?
> >
> > In addition the 2.1 spec renamed the enum value "IntegerType" to
> > "IntType".
> >
> > Would it be appropriate to file a bug to have this value renamed?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael Yoder
> > Software Developer
> > Rogue Wave Software
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> --
> Pete
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
