Hi,
If we admit what Simon has found in the first place is indeed an
inconsistency then I believe we must rectify that and if this patch goes
well that way then it should be committed. Furthermore, I guess Simon's
gone and spent some valuable time over this patch on our invitation to do
that. S
I feel that M2 should have been (is) in lock down and fixes should only be to
issues that clearly break functionality. However, we the community SHOULD have
stuck to that position. Given we gave the go ahead to this and two people have
claimed to have tested it and it addresses the issue stated
On 11/29/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2006, at 4:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Looks like that answers all the questions and sounds convincing to
> me. We
> discussed doing this the other day and agreed it needed doing and
> based on
> that Simon went ahead and did the wor
On Nov 29, 2006, at 4:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
Looks like that answers all the questions and sounds convincing to
me. We
discussed doing this the other day and agreed it needed doing and
based on
that Simon went ahead and did the work for it, so I think we should
go ahead
and apply this to M2
On 11/28/06, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm responding to Jeremy's comments here rather than in TUSCANY-949
because I believe it's considered good practice to have discussions
on the mailing list rather than in updates to JIRAs.
Jeremy Boynes (JIRA) wrote:
> [
http://issues.apac
I'm responding to Jeremy's comments here rather than in TUSCANY-949
because I believe it's considered good practice to have discussions
on the mailing list rather than in updates to JIRAs.
Jeremy Boynes (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-949?page=comments#action_124
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-949?page=comments#action_12454069
]
Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-949:
---
I don't think we should use profiles in this way. We already use profiles (e.g.
in SDO) to determine the type of c
