Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-09 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
s, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2 [snip] Raymond Feng wrote: 2) When I try to por

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-08 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
al Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2 [snip] Raymond Feng wrote: 2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-08 Thread Raymond Feng
;Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2 [snip] Raymond Feng wrote: 2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support JUnit 4.x anno

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-08 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[snip] Raymond Feng wrote: 2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support JUnit 4.x annotations, I found it fairly cumbersome to use java reflection to access org.junit.* classes and annotations. Can we add JUnit as a compile time dependency? If we don't like to have it in the core, ma

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-08 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jim Marino wrote: +1 from me. A side comment, this will give us the ability to init a single runtime instance in a method annotated with a Junit @BeforeClass annotation and reuse it across multiple test methods. I think it will be interesting for integration tests in particular. Raymond, ar

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-07 Thread Jim Marino
+1 from me. A side comment, this will give us the ability to init a single runtime instance in a method annotated with a Junit @BeforeClass annotation and reuse it across multiple test methods. I think it will be interesting for integration tests in particular. Raymond, are you going to a

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-07 Thread Raymond Feng
: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:56 PM Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2 Luciano Resende wrote: +1, Thanks for volunteering ! On 3/7/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL P

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Luciano Resende wrote: +1, Thanks for volunteering ! On 3/7/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit 4.xtest cases under maven. I plan to update pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration branch to take advantage of this

Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-07 Thread Luciano Resende
+1, Thanks for volunteering ! On 3/7/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit 4.xtest cases under maven. I plan to update pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration branch to take advantage of this capability. I have run t

[sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 and JUnit 4.2

2007-03-07 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit 4.x test cases under maven. I plan to update pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration branch to take advantage of this capability. I have run the full top-down build and everything looks good. Please let me know if you have