[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-02-28 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1987. --- Resolution: Fixed I assume the problem is fixed as the patch has been applied. Build

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-02-19 Thread haleh mahbod (JIRA)
that it says the fix for this problem should be considered for post 1.1 so I am moving it. Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-21 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561056#action_12561056 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1987: - I've not applied this to trunk Build break

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-21 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
: -- I've now applied this to trunk was (Author: simonslaws): I've not applied this to trunk Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-16 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
the current snapshots (unless the failures reappear). Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987 Project: Tuscany Issue Type

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
Rajini. I'll move this JIRA out of 1.1 now and assign to Java-SCA-Next so we remember to follow up. Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-15 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
, and if the problem reappears, rename ConversationTestCase to stop it running? Thank you, Rajini Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-15 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-1987: --- Assignee: Simon Laws Build break in osgi-implementation itest

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-15 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
and got a clean build. I need a few others to try (especially on linux) before I move to resolve. Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-1987: Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Build break in osgi-implementation

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Build System Affects

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-14 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
could also be this random itest/osgi issue. It failed once (http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=37962projectId=277) and then worked the next time around. So a good place to look for a working and a broken example. Build break in osgi-implementation itest

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1987) Build break in osgi-implementation itest

2008-01-14 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
the issue is resolved, so that the Continuum build can continue to run. The revision number is r611954. Please reverse this change when the problem is fixed. Build break in osgi-implementation itest Key: TUSCANY-1987

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1846) Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

2007-10-19 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-1846: Assignee: Luciano Resende Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1846) Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

2007-10-19 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
in a different way, and the composite files were processed before componentType files. This was causing issues during resolution of the composite. This was same issue as TUSCANY-1847 Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1846) Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build

2007-10-13 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
Build break: BPEL implementation module breaks the continuum build -- Key: TUSCANY-1846 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1846 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

Re: Build break, was: svn commit: r561190 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/itest/contribution-import-export

2007-07-31 Thread ant elder
Can't we just use the commit log comment in the fixing commit to point out things like this? ...ant On 7/31/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This broke the build for me, as the case was passing an incorrect contribution URI to remove(...). I fixed it for you under

Build break, was: svn commit: r561190 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/itest/contribution-import-export

2007-07-30 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
This broke the build for me, as the case was passing an incorrect contribution URI to remove(...). I fixed it for you under revision r561201, as I need to be able build. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: lresende Date: Mon Jul 30 17:07:24 2007 New Revision: 561190 URL:

Build break (was: Re: svn commit: r558625)

2007-07-23 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Luciano. Unfortunately I had to revert this commit because it breaks the build with the following compilation error. Please fix the problem and re-check them in. Thanks, Raymond [INFO] Building Apache Tuscany Embedded Runtime Host [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install] [INFO]

Re: Build break (was: Re: svn commit: r558625)

2007-07-23 Thread Luciano Resende
Sorry for any trouble, fixed this under revision #558780. On 7/23/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Luciano. Unfortunately I had to revert this commit because it breaks the build with the following compilation error. Please fix the problem and re-check them in. Thanks, Raymond

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread Simon Nash
I did a clean checkout this morning my time and built SCA from an empty Maven repo. I got the same build error in implementation-das that Sebastien was seeing. I was hoping that starting with an empty maven repo would cause the correct levels of SDO and DAS to be downloaded but it seems that

SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread Luciano Resende
Kelvin or others working more closely with SDO, could someone please publish the latest SDO Snapshots ? On 7/18/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did a clean checkout this morning my time and built SCA from an empty Maven repo. I got the same build error in implementation-das that

Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson
I just published a fresh SDO snapshot Kelvin. On 18/07/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kelvin or others working more closely with SDO, could someone please publish the latest SDO Snapshots ? On 7/18/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did a clean checkout this morning my

Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread Simon Nash
I tried removing commonj/* and org/apache/tuscany/sdo/* from my local maven repo, then doing a complete clean and rebuild. I got the same failure as shown below. Any ideas? Simon Running org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.das.company.CompanyServiceTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,

Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Nash wrote: I tried removing commonj/* and org/apache/tuscany/sdo/* from my local maven repo, then doing a complete clean and rebuild. I got the same failure as shown below. Any ideas? Simon Running org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.das.company.CompanyServiceTestCase Tests run:

Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-18 Thread Simon Nash
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: I tried removing commonj/* and org/apache/tuscany/sdo/* from my local maven repo, then doing a complete clean and rebuild. I got the same failure as shown below. Any ideas? Simon Running

Need new DAS snapshot (was Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?)

2007-07-18 Thread Simon Nash
I figured out what is causing the problem. I rebuilt SDO and the problem still occurred. I then rebuilt DAS and the problem went away. So it seems that we need a new published snapshot of DAS that is compatible with the trunk version of sca/modules/implementation-das. Simon Simon Nash

Re: Need new DAS snapshot (was Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?)

2007-07-18 Thread kelvin goodson
Simon, have you seen the response on the thread SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das? from luciano saying that he published a DAS snapshot just a few minutes ago. I guess you may have run your build just a few minutes too early to catch it? Regards Kelvin. On 18/07/07

Re: Need new DAS snapshot (was Re: SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das?)

2007-07-18 Thread Simon Nash
I tried this and it works OK now. Thanks, Kelvin and Luciano! Simon kelvin goodson wrote: Simon, have you seen the response on the thread SDO Snapshot, was Re: Build break in implementation-das? from luciano saying that he published a DAS snapshot just a few minutes ago. I guess you may

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-17 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
- From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Build break in implementation-das? Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-17 Thread ant elder
OK for me too. It's sca/modules/implementation-das that breaks. Does it work for you? - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Build break in implementation-das? Jean-Sebastien

Build successful, was: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-17 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Build break in implementation-das? Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea? and break as well for me with local

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-17 Thread Luciano Resende
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:14 PM Subject: Re: Build break in implementation-das? Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea? and break as well for me

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-17 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Luciano Resende wrote: Everything is building ok for me too, is this the only module that is failing for you ? It works now, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg20174.html Thanks -- Jean-Sebastien

Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-16 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea? Starting DASServiceComponent java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.das.provider.DataAccessEngine.executeCommand(DataAccessEngine.java:41) at

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-16 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea? and break as well for me with local builds of the SDO and DAS builds. Starting DASServiceComponent java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: Build break in implementation-das?

2007-07-16 Thread Raymond Feng
: Re: Build break in implementation-das? Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Build of the SCA HEAD using the published SDO and DAS snapshots gives me an error. Any idea? and break as well for me with local builds of the SDO and DAS builds. Starting DASServiceComponent

Re: Build break, was: svn commit: r544528 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca: modules/extension-helper/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/spi/impl/ samples/helloworld-ws-reference/src/main/java/hellow

2007-06-06 Thread Simon Nash
+1 for reverting implementation-crud back to the official SPIs and adding another sample for the simplified extension layer. Simon Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Ant, This commit introduced breaking changes to the helloworld-ws-reference and helloworld-ws-service samples, using some kind

Build break, was: svn commit: r544528 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca: modules/extension-helper/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/spi/impl/ samples/helloworld-ws-reference/src/main/java/helloworld

2007-06-05 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Ant, This commit introduced breaking changes to the helloworld-ws-reference and helloworld-ws-service samples, using some kind of binding.console. Probably an oversight :) More important, I think we should revert to the official Tuscany SPIs in the implementation-crud sample, as it is our

Build break - databinding test case error

2007-05-28 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Building revision r542376 gives me the following error: testMap(org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.extension.SimpleTypeMapperExtensionTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.067 sec ERROR! java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: --02 at

Re: Build break - databinding test case error

2007-05-28 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I'm sorry that a local change slipped into the commit and it hit a bug in SUN JDK. I fixed it under r542409. Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 7:53 PM Subject: Build break

Re: Build break - databinding test case error

2007-05-28 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[snip] Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I'm sorry that a local change slipped into the commit and it hit a bug in SUN JDK. I fixed it under r542409. Raymond I checked out r542409 and got a successful build. Thanks. -- Jean-Sebastien

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-996) Build break with Persistence test case

2006-12-18 Thread Jim Marino (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-996?page=all ] Jim Marino closed TUSCANY-996. -- Resolution: Fixed Meeraj fixed this Build break with Persistence test case -- Key: TUSCANY-996

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-996) Build break with Persistence test case

2006-12-15 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
Build break with Persistence test case -- Key: TUSCANY-996 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-996 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Core Affects Versions

Re: Build break b/c of SDOHelper

2006-12-13 Thread kelvin goodson
OK, I have done what I think is necessary. Please note that in this exercise I have updated the specVersion property of the sdo-api pom.xmlfrom 2.0.1 to 2.1, hence all the sdo spec related artifacts of the deploy have r2.1 in their names, rather than the r2.0.1 that has been the case until

Re: Build break b/c of SDOHelper

2006-12-12 Thread kelvin goodson
if its required to sign snapshot deployments? Regards, Kelvin. On 11/12/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting the following build break in /sca/tools: /Users/jmarino/workspace/tuscany/java/sca/tools/src/main/java/org/ apache/tuscany/tools/wsdl2java/generate

Build break b/c of SDOHelper

2006-12-11 Thread Jim Marino
I'm getting the following build break in /sca/tools: /Users/jmarino/workspace/tuscany/java/sca/tools/src/main/java/org/ apache/tuscany/tools/wsdl2java/generate/WSDL2JavaGenerator.java: [128,30] cannot find symbol symbol : constructor XSDHelperImpl (org.eclipse.emf.ecore.util.ExtendedMetaData

Build Break : Possible circular reference

2006-11-10 Thread Luciano Resende
Hi Guys Looks like the latest DAS samples that use SCA services are breaking the build if you clean you maven repository, and this is possible caused by circular reference, as DAS is suposed to build first then SCA, but the sample have SCA dependencies. I was wondering if maybe this should be

Re: Build Break : Possible circular reference

2006-11-10 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I committed it under r473495. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:33 PM Subject: Build Break : Possible circular reference Hi Guys Looks like the latest DAS

trunk build break should have been fixed by r469231

2006-10-30 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, After checking with the axis2 team, I had to use http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository; as the maven1 repository to download axis2 related SNAPSHOT versions. The change is made against sca/pom/parent/pom.xml. Please update and verify. Thanks, Raymond

Re: Java SCA Build break

2006-09-10 Thread Raymond Feng
] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 10:42 PM Subject: Re: Java SCA Build break I thought we were working off snapshots of SDO and that we had decoupled the build process? If not, can we remove this from the main build? Jim On Sep 9, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Raymond Feng wrote

Re: Java SCA Build break

2006-09-10 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote: I thought we were working off snapshots of SDO and that we had decoupled the build process? If not, can we remove this from the main build? That's the plan but we need to finalize the release version id before we can do so. Until then you

Java SCA Build break

2006-09-09 Thread Jim Marino
I'm receiving the following failures: Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.DataObject2XMLStreamReaderTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.201 sec FAILURE! testTransform (org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.DataObject2XMLStreamReaderTestCase)

Re: Java SCA Build break

2006-09-09 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Jim. You need to rebuild SDO impl to get r441810. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:59 PM Subject: Java SCA Build break I'm receiving the following failures: Running

Re: Java SCA Build break

2006-09-09 Thread Jim Marino
- From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:59 PM Subject: Java SCA Build break I'm receiving the following failures: Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.DataObject2XMLStreamReaderTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0

Build break

2006-09-04 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Building from root I get 5 failures in the javascript project all similar to: testStateless (org.apache.tuscany.container.javascript.function.ScopeTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.227 sec ERROR! java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.init

Re: Build break

2006-09-04 Thread Jeremy Boynes
FWIW I commented out javascript and get a similar failure in the spring module -- Jeremy On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Building from root I get 5 failures in the javascript project all similar to: testStateless

Re: Build break

2006-09-04 Thread Andy Piper
I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo plugin). I had to do mvn install mvn clean mvn install to get a full build :( andy At 15:46 04/09/2006, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Building from root I get 5

False alarm: Build break

2006-09-04 Thread Jeremy Boynes
My bad - I had a uncommitted change to a pom that meant it was getting an old version of a dependency. -- Jeremy On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Andy Piper wrote: I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo

Can't clean before building, was: Build break

2006-09-04 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Andy Piper wrote: I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo plugin). I had to do mvn install mvn clean mvn install to get a full build :( This is a maven issue because we

Re: New build break

2006-08-26 Thread Fuhwei Lwo
Hi Jim, I couldn't reproduce the problem you were seeing. I created a standalone app called DateConversionTest.java mimic the SDO impl without SDO and uploaded it to TUSCANY-579. Can you run it on your env and let me know the result? Thanks. Fuhwei Jim Marino [EMAIL

New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Ignacio Silva-Lepe
The latest update, that updates a lot of the core/implementation/processors, seems to be breaking a lot if not all of the sca samples. The way I see this is by doing a mvn clean and mvn -e from the top, which breaks while running the tests for the SDO impl, so then I go to sca/core and do mvn

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
Hi Ignacio, The build runs fine for me. Did you try mvn clean first? Can you send a stacktrace if it persists? Jim On Aug 25, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: The latest update, that updates a lot of the core/implementation/ processors, seems to be breaking a lot if not all of

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
I just synced SDO and am getting the following when building from /java: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: The expected value did not result when calling toDay after initializing with toDay. at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) at

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: Ok, first, after mvn clean from the top and trying mvn -e from the top, I get: Then I do mvn -e from sca/core and from sca/spi and that works. Then I do mvn -e from samples/sca and I get:

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Ignacio Silva-Lepe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:05 PM Subject: Re: New build break On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: Ok, first, after mvn clean from the top and trying mvn -e from the top, I get: Then I do mvn -e from sca/core and from

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
://repo1.maven.org/maven2), ibiblio (http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2) You also need to build in sca/runtime webapp and web-apphost - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:05 PM Subject: Re: New build break

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Ok, yes, the recipe is getting more intricate every time, but I got the samples to run now. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:45 PM Subject: Re: New build break I'm going to send out

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Jim, I attempted this on a variety of time/timezone environments and thought I had addressed all the possibilities in terms of TimeZones, daylight savings time, northern and southern hemispheres, etc. Can you tell me what TimeZone you are in and about what time you ran the test with

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
Hi Brian, I ran this about 9PST and again at 4.53PST and received: testConversionsFromDay (org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.01 sec FAILURE! [ stacktrace ] ---

Re: New build break

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
. - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:45 PM Subject: Re: New build break I'm going to send out a separate mail dealing with how to solve the issues you are seeing long term as I think we are witnessing

BUILD BREAK looking for: ws-commons:axiom-api:jar:SNAPSHOT

2006-08-17 Thread Scott Kurz
I think this is a real build break (not a bad pom in my maven repo)... I pasted my Maven output below after pulling the entire 'java' SVN branch and building I don't see that any of the remote repo sites contain SNAPSHOT versions of the Axis2 jars such as axiom-api, so I'm wondering how

Re: BUILD BREAK looking for: ws-commons:axiom-api:jar:SNAPSHOT

2006-08-17 Thread Rick
Just checked something in that fixed this. With that my build ran to completion. Scott Kurz wrote: I think this is a real build break (not a bad pom in my maven repo)... I pasted my Maven output below after pulling the entire 'java' SVN branch and building I don't see that any

Re: Build break

2006-08-17 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Does it work on a Sun JVM? On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Kevin Williams wrote: Just updated and I am having trouble building ... [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 1.983 sec [surefire] [surefire] testTransformation2

Re: Build break

2006-08-17 Thread Raymond Feng
: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:57 AM Subject: Re: Build break Does it work on a Sun JVM? On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Kevin Williams wrote: Just updated and I am having trouble building ... [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0

Re: BUILD BREAK looking for: ws-commons:axiom-api:jar:SNAPSHOT

2006-08-17 Thread Venkata Krishnan
this. With that my build ran to completion. Scott Kurz wrote: I think this is a real build break (not a bad pom in my maven repo)... I pasted my Maven output below after pulling the entire 'java' SVN branch and building I don't see that any of the remote repo sites contain SNAPSHOT versions

Re: Build break

2006-08-17 Thread Kevin Williams
I tried this on OS X with the Sun JVM and get a different error in the same area: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraints violated when linking javax/xml/namespace/QName class at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.RuntimeBuiltinLeafInfoImpl.clinit(RuntimeBuiltinLeafInfoImpl.java:186)

Re: Build break

2006-08-17 Thread Raymond Feng
] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Build break I tried this on OS X with the Sun JVM and get a different error in the same area: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraints violated when linking javax/xml/namespace/QName class

Build break

2006-08-14 Thread Kevin Williams
I am getting the following error trying to build revision: 431472 ... [surefire] testWSDLLocation(org.apache.tuscany.container.javascript.RhinoScriptI ntrospectorTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.02 sec ERROR! java.lang.RuntimeException: WSDLException: faultCode=OTHER_ERROR: Unable to

Build break?

2006-07-14 Thread Kevin Williams
I just updated my local copy (svn update) and now get the following build error: [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Compilation failure C:\apacheSVN\java\sca\core\src\main\java\org\apache\tuscany\core\context\impl\Co

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-369) Build break - failed to resolve artifact das-samples

2006-05-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-369?page=all ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-369: Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 406394. Fixed the pom.xml causing the build failure. Build break - failed to resolve artifact das

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-09 Thread Kevin Williams
find symbol symbol : variable super location: class org.apache.tuscany.sdo.generate.adapter.SDOGenClassGeneratorAdapter -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 May 2006 03:39 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Raymond Feng Subject: Re: Build Break? IBM's

RE: Build Break?

2006-05-09 Thread Frank Budinsky
: Raymond Feng Subject: Re: Build Break? IBM's JDK actually isn't broken with respect to the DOMImplementations. It actually works like it's supposed to. I've changed the code so it should now work with both IBM and Sun JDK's. It will try the correct way first, and if that fails

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Kevin Williams
:35 AM Subject: Re: Build Break? I had the same problem. There's a new feature in EMF that the SDO generator needs, but for some reason mvn didn't just pick it up for me either. I fixed it by deleting the eclipse portion of my local repository, after which it downloaded the latest jars

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Raymond Feng
, May 08, 2006 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Build Break? You might try deleting the entire org/eclipse folder. I did this and SDO and SDO tools now build fine. Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, By removing the EMF jars from m2 repository, the compiling problem is fixed. But the SDO code-gen failed

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Raymond Feng
Frank has checked in a workaround. Please refresh and build again. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:18 PM Subject: Re: Build Break? Hi Raymond, Any luck with this? I am having

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Ignacio Silva-Lepe
] - Any ideas? Thanks in advance. - Original Message - From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: Re: Build Break? Frank has checked in a workaround. Please refresh and build

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
more [INFO] --- -- Any ideas? Thanks in advance. - Original Message - From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: Re: Build Break? Frank has

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
] - -- -- Any ideas? Thanks in advance. - Original Message - From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: Re: Build Break? Frank has checked in a workaround. Please refresh

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Raymond Feng
- Original Message - From: Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:24 PM Subject: Re: Build Break? Hmm... that's a strange one. That class SHOULD be in your JDK rt.jar. What version

Re: Build Break?

2006-05-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
: com.sun.org. apache.xerces.internal.dom.DOMImplementationSourceImpl Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:24 PM Subject: Re: Build Break

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-214) Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374.

2006-04-24 Thread Frank Budinsky (JIRA)
on Linux. The fix I committed is to use a proper scoped XMLHelper instead of XMLHelper.INSTANCE. Please let me know if this fixes the problem. If not, I need more information about what exactly is going on in the Linux environment. Thanks, Frank. Build break in sdo/impl - test case

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-214) Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374.

2006-04-23 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374. -- Key: TUSCANY-214 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-214

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-214) Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374.

2006-04-23 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-214?page=comments#action_12375929 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-214: -- The latest code builds successfully on my machine @ 9:20pm PST, 04/23/2006. Build break in sdo/impl - test case

BUILD BREAK, was: [jira] (TUSCANY-214) Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374.

2006-04-23 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-214?page=comments#action_12375929 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-214: -- The latest code builds successfully on my machine @ 9:20pm PST, 04/23/2006. Build break in sdo

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-214) Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision r396374.

2006-04-23 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-214?page=comments#action_12375933 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-214: -- I'm running Windows XP. Build break in sdo/impl - test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineTypeTestCase - revision