Re: DAS as a component extension or a component, was: Exposing DAS as an SCA container - Where contribution should go for better collaboration ?

On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Rick wrote: I'm not convinced that DAS really requires it but I'll let them be the judge of that. Just from what I remembered I didn't see the need so I questioned it. I just think when possible it best to integrate at the highest level of the stack that suits

Re: DAS as a component extension or a component, was: Exposing DAS as an SCA container - Where contribution should go for better collaboration ?

I'm not convinced that DAS really requires it but I'll let them be the judge of that. Just from what I remembered I didn't see the need so I questioned it. I just think when possible it best to integrate at the highest level of the stack that suits your needs. Jim, you lost me and peeked my int

DAS as a component extension or a component, was: Exposing DAS as an SCA container - Where contribution should go for better collaboration ?

On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:34 AM, cr22rc wrote: My understanding is you would need to implement classes from tuscany-spi to implement your container. This is surely specific to Tuscany. The work that was started by Luciano was as I understood it a Pojo that was an SCA component. That should b