Re: Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-16 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng wrote: It was initially there to package the jars as OSGi bundles. I don't see any need at this point. So I suggest that we remove it. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, April

Re: Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-16 Thread kelvin goodson
I took a look at the SDO side of this. The build still fails if you remove the 0.8.0 version request. I was trying to look back to understand this dependency, but it seems to have been done as part of TUSCANY-679 and its not at all clear there the reasons for the change. Can anyone help me

Re: Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-16 Thread ant elder
Is that the correct JIRA, TUSCANY-679 is about InterfaceWSDLLoader and doesn't look relevant? ...ant On 4/16/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I took a look at the SDO side of this. The build still fails if you remove the 0.8.0 version request. I was trying to look back to

Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-09 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
The following poms: ./spec/commonj/pom.xml ./spec/sdo-api/pom.xml depend on this plugin: groupIdorg.apache.felix.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-osgi-plugin/artifactId version0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/version Any idea what this is used for? If not, then could we remove this dependency on a SNAPSHOT?

Re: Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-09 Thread Raymond Feng
It was initially there to package the jars as OSGi bundles. I don't see any need at this point. So I suggest that we remove it. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:29 PM

Re: Dependency on Felix plugin snapshot in commonj and SDO API modules

2007-04-09 Thread Luciano Resende
Just in case it helps, there was a discussion[1] around why the specific version is being used. [1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg11598.html On 4/9/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was initially there to package the jars as OSGi bundles. I don't see