Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-19 Thread Dan Becker
Raymond Feng wrote: I have some trouble applying the patch. It complains an unknown line type is found line 573 (I don't know what it means:-(. Hi Raymond. I regenerated the patch as TUSCANY-2290.2.patch and attached it to the TUSCANY-2290 JIRA. I think with the previous patch I deleted some

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-17 Thread Raymond Feng
@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: More Java security fixes on the way Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to suggest the following: - Keep the Java2 security blocks in test case classes - Don't put them in sample program classes Hmmm but looking at these test cases, could you help me understand why we

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-16 Thread Dan Becker
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to suggest the following: - Keep the Java2 security blocks in test case classes - Don't put them in sample program classes Hmmm but looking at these test cases, could you help me understand why we need these technical API calls to the jmsBroker at all?

RE: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-14 Thread Haleh Mahbod
Keep the samples simple and provide documentation. -Original Message- From: Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:11 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: More Java security fixes on the way Raymond Feng wrote: I'm looking into the patch you contributed

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-14 Thread ant elder
security fixes on the way Raymond Feng wrote: I'm looking into the patch you contributed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290. There is one issue catching my eyes. We have samples in Tuscany today which use some technology APIs, for example, to start the ActiveMQ JMS

RE: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-14 Thread Haleh Mahbod
Keep the samples simple and provide documentation. -Original Message- From: Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:11 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: More Java security fixes on the way Raymond Feng wrote: I'm looking into the patch you contributed

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Dan Becker wrote: Raymond Feng wrote: I'm looking into the patch you contributed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290. There is one issue catching my eyes. We have samples in Tuscany today which use some technology APIs, for example, to start the ActiveMQ JMS broker. To run

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-13 Thread Raymond Feng
-- From: Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 7:29 AM To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: More Java security fixes on the way FYI, so every one is aware of recent Tuscany security changes and for your comments. Over the last few

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-13 Thread Dan Becker
Raymond Feng wrote: I'm looking into the patch you contributed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290. There is one issue catching my eyes. We have samples in Tuscany today which use some technology APIs, for example, to start the ActiveMQ JMS broker. To run these samples

More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-02 Thread Dan Becker
FYI, so every one is aware of recent Tuscany security changes and for your comments. Over the last few weeks I have been making fixes to the Tuscany core in order to make the code a bit safer with Java 2 security enabled. There are many instances in which we want Tuscany code to perform some