Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
TUSCANY-2164 describes an issue that has been resolved in OASIS
as ASSEMBLY-27. The current implementation is correct according to
the OSOA 1.0 specs, but there are good reasons to change it to
align with the OASIS resolution of this issue. This
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY-2164 describes an issue that has been resolved in OASIS
as ASSEMBLY-27. The current implementation is correct according to
the OSOA 1.0 specs, but there are good reasons to change it to
align with the OASIS
Simon Nash wrote:
TUSCANY-2164 describes an issue that has been resolved in OASIS
as ASSEMBLY-27. The current implementation is correct according to
the OSOA 1.0 specs, but there are good reasons to change it to
align with the OASIS resolution of this issue. This raises the
general question of
Another approach for tracking fixed OASIS issues in Tuscany could be to put
the OASIS issue number in the heading of the JIRAs. This way, we would not
need to track a different list and the JIRA content would contain the detail
of discussions, etc.
On 4/1/08, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
