I'll prototype Frank's comment in TUSCANY-713 once I have some time.
On 9/8/06, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Yang, what are you planning to prototype? I thought that 2-1 (from your
previous reply) is all we're talking about. See my comment in TUSCANY-713.
Btw, it would be best
Hi Yang, what are you planning to prototype? I thought that 2-1 (from your
previous reply) is all we're talking about. See my comment in TUSCANY-713.
Btw, it would be best to reply "with history" if you refer to items (e.g.
2-1) from an earlier note.
Thanks,
Frank.
"Yang ZHONG" <[EMAIL PROTECT
I'll prototype once I have some time.
BTW, Fuhwei wishes for 2-1 too, see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-713
--
Yang ZHONG
Robbie,
if I understand your proposal correctly then it only works for the case
where the schema location hint provided in the XML document is a resolvable
URL (and that the posted version of the schema is the one that is intended
for use). As I understand it the processor of a document is at li
I personally have some comments on your two concerns.
2-1. Should XMLHelper load schema? If so, which scope to register?
I propose XMLHelper should load designated schema.
XMLHelper (Tuscany implementation) is associated with a scope (TypeHelper)
already.
XMLHelper can register the loaded schem
I have two questions here. Please forgive some terminology fumbling here as
I probably fall into the category of people SDO is meant to serve - meaning
I have a familarity with XML but have not been bothered to truely become
empowered by it.
I have been taking a peak at Tuscany-696 and the follo
