Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Mike Edwards wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code? I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this week but for that to work I'll need to split

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Edwards
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code? I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this week but for that to work I'll need to split implementation-bpel in

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Luciano Resende
Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl... BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Are you guys still making

Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration - component type update done

2008-05-07 Thread Mike Edwards
Luciano Resende wrote: Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl... BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luciano, The class