On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
HI Jim,
Thanks. I have responded below. Please let me know how to go
forward with
this.
- Venkat
On 9/9/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for jumping in and doing this.
I was thinking the JDK proxy wire
One clarification of a typo:
And then, most testcases did work successfully but for the ones
that asserted if the created proxy was an instance of
java.lang.reflect.Proxy. I could have change all them as well,
but did not
want to go with too may changes all over the place until you
+1 for 1.0-incubator-M2
On 10/09/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any more thoughts on this? Most popular so far is 1.0-incubator-M2
--
Jeremy
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Before publishing artifacts to the snapshot repo I need to make
sure all the versions
Robbie,
I have a fix for this exception, but I still have some work to do before
the code is stable. I can create an updated patch to handle removing this
exception. I won't do that until you ask, as I'm hoping I can fix the
other issues first.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 06/09/06, Robbie Minshall
Did you get a chance to look into the MacOS X port? I have an
iBook with 10.4.7 ppc Mac OS X here and was wondering if you had a
patch to the Makefiles that I could try.
Quick update on this, I have the Axis2C mostly built, SDO part
of the port was straightforward, currently working thru
Hi,
I am getting a build error, with the latest code ...
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.091
sec FAILURE!
testLifecycle(org.apache.tuscany.runtime.webapp.TuscanyContextListenerTe
stCase) Time elapsed: 0.07 sec ERROR!
java.lang.AssertionError:
Unexpected
Not trying to open any worm-cans, but having 1.0 at the start of the name
makes it look like it's a 1.0 release, when in actuality it's still a
milestone release - is this the effect we're looking for? Is the code at a
1.0 level of quality, stability and functionality? Or would people say this
is
Hi Ant,
I aplologize for the delayed response. I am stuck with some other work and am
neck deep into it right now. I would not be able to look any further into this.
Could somebody else please take this forward. Thanks.
Bert Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am also interested in
Hi, I have the same thoughts as Andy and infact this is precisely why I
backed '0.95-incubator'.
- Venkat
On 9/11/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not trying to open any worm-cans, but having 1.0 at the start of the name
makes it look like it's a 1.0 release, when in actuality it's
In Java SDO, when generating types dynamically from xsd, if you want to
include an element from the base SDO type system then to have a valid XSD
you must import sdoModel.xsd. My scenario is when including an element in
my schema of type sdo:ChangeSummaryType.
xsd:schema xmlns:sdo=commonj.sdo
False alarm :-( it's working with a clean build.
-Original Message-
From: Meeraj Kunnumpurath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2006 09:20
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Build error
Hi,
I am getting a build error, with the latest code ...
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,
On 9/9/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
Just got it working on Windows, compiles the runtime samples and
runs the
calculator sample with no changes (on our side) required.
I tried out the REST support too, but this seems to be a bit flakey -
the
I've been talking to the Computing Lab at the University of Oxford
about various ways in which Tuscany might be useful to them. One
subject that came up was that we could offer project work to their
part-time M.Sc students ie students that are typically already working
as full time software
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-711?page=comments#action_12433834
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-711:
Since I am pretty confident that this is an EMF bug, I went ahead a submitted
EMF bug# 156861.
Tuscany SDO generates
The agenda here is up to you.
I will be more than happy to experiement with, and write some test cases for
the ChangeSummary on a DataObject code when it is available. The sooner it
is available the sooner I will be able to make some progress on this, the
more issues fixed the better for
I am new to Tuscany and looking to help out. However, I am obtaining
the following error during build:
[INFO] -
---
[INFO] Building Apache Tuscany WSDL
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the patch. Wrt your questions:
- Lost message. There are two ways to think about this depending on how we
decide to continue to handle routing and correlation. The options for this
are, ideally: (1) continue to use routing tables, which can lead to issues
like the one
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Andrew Borley wrote:
Not trying to open any worm-cans, but having 1.0 at the start of
the name
makes it look like it's a 1.0 release, when in actuality it's still a
milestone release - is this the effect we're looking for? Is the
code at a
1.0 level of quality,
Thanks !
On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:55 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Can I volunteer?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The XmlSchema compile error you see is due to a back level version of
XmlSchema picking up the latest snapshot should fix it, try deleting
org\apache\ws\commons\XmlSchema\SNAPSHOT from you maven repository.
The XPP3 release being used by Groovy does get found later from the ibiblio
repository
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:57 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Now in the java world here's a nasty catch, one side effect of
this which,
given the way we run things, only occurs in a maven test run, and
not when
running junits in eclipse is that one unit test can affect a later
one. In
maven the
Hi Yang,
I took a review of your prototype and found you are implementing it in Java
5 SDK. Currently SDO impl is on JDK 1.4. Do you plan to support JDK 1.4 for
this registry feature? Thanks.
Fuhwei
Yang ZHONG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've updated the registry proposal
basing on
ant, thank you for the quick response. Deleting the snapshot got me
past the error. I had thought that running mvn with the -U option
would take care of this for me but apparently not. Afterwards, I ran
svn update, mvn clean, and tried the build again. Unfortunately I
continue to have issues:
Are we having an IRC chat today?
This may be a subject that doesn't have wide enough interest to make it
suitable for the IRC chat, but I'd like to pin down some more detail on
what I need to do to put SDO into to the M2 release.
Regards, Kelvin.
Lee
Unless they've changed things again, that class is only available in
recent snapshots - can you check which repo mvn downloaded XmlScheam
from (it should be the M1 repo at http://people.apache.org/repository
and *not* the M2 one). The POM warnings are not fatal, they just
prevent
Jeremy,
Unless I am missing something, this latest problem is not directly
related to the XmlSchema problem above. Perhaps I should have made
that more clear. Never-the-less, I have explicity taken the latest
snapshot from
Frank and I talked about the registry the other day,
we both think it may be something useful for SDO Type registry (and Global
Property registry).
(Did you suggest that too?)
However, there's no concrete plan to integrate yet.
By the time we actually integrate (if it happens), maybe SDO impl is
I wont have time to check until later but I suspect there's now a mismatch
with the other Axis2 snapshot jars in you repository, try deleting the axis2
directory in your maven repository so the build gets fresh copies.
...ant
On 9/11/06, Lee Surprenant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy,
Hi,
This time around I am stuck with passing java object instances to ruby. I
need this to enable service reference calls from Ruby. I want to be able
to pass to ruby an instance of a Java proxy to an external service (say
StockQuote). Then from ruby I want to make service method calls over
I'm trying to create a new distribution that picks up
org.apache.tuscany.bindings:axis2 component. It doesn't work because of
what looks to be a problem with the POM for the Axis2 dependencies.
During the regular build of Tuscany this message appears in a number of
places but does not seem to
I was somewhat surprised by this change as the commit message
provides no indication that an entire module was commented out of the
build. This also causes some other modules to fail if an old version
of this module is removed from someone's local repo.
Please can we make sure that commit
They seem to be publishing concurrently to
http://people.apache.org/repository/ws-commons/jars/
and
http://people.apache.org/repository/org.apache.ws.commons/jars/
The former is probably for legacy applications as the pom in the
trunk (at least for XmlSchema) now has a groupId of
Update tools module to use latest XmlSchema version
---
Key: TUSCANY-715
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-715
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA
That definately did it. Thanks so much for helping to resolve this.
Looking forward to contributing after I do some learning. :-)
-Lee
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Improve Ruby Container to support method calls over Ruby Classes
Key: TUSCANY-716
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-716
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Sub-task
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-716?page=all ]
Venkatakrishnan updated TUSCANY-716:
Attachment: Tuscany-Ruby-Container-Update-Sept-11.diff
Hi, here is a patch that ...
- enhances the existing container to support service calls over
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-712?page=comments#action_12433927
]
Paul Golick commented on TUSCANY-712:
-
I have verified that this issue is fixed in 442279. Please close this issue.
recently added file
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-711?page=comments#action_12433955
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-711:
After further investigation, I have confirmed this is definately a Tuscany SDO
problem with class SDOXSDEcoreBuilder.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-716?page=all ]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-716:
-
Assignee: ant elder
Improve Ruby Container to support method calls over Ruby Classes
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
This time around I am stuck with passing java object instances to
ruby. I
need this to enable service reference calls from Ruby. I want to be
able
to pass to ruby an instance of a Java proxy to an external service (say
StockQuote). Then from ruby I want to
Hi,
I just wanted to mention that a feature being dropped into the SDO Java
codebase involves adding two new methods to the TypeHelper interface -
that is, the SDO spec (API) TypeHelper interface. These new methods are
early versions of methods that will be added to SDO version 2.1 - but we'd
Do you want to include these in the M2 release or should we based
that on the 2.0.1 API?
--
Jeremy
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to mention that a feature being dropped into the SDO
Java
codebase involves adding two new methods to the TypeHelper
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-711?page=comments#action_12434007
]
Yang ZHONG commented on TUSCANY-711:
Thanks a lot for such detailed info, I'm looking at this issure.
As for Ron fix 1, I agree with Ron it's not really
This is one of the last minute features I still wanted to get into the M2
release, so people can start to play with it.
Frank.
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2006 06:10:17 PM:
Do you want to include these in the M2 release or should we based
that on the 2.0.1 API?
--
Hi,
On Linux, shared library libtuscany_sdo.so references symbols from
libxml2.so but is not linked with it. Programs that use
libtuscany_sdo.so then need to be linked with libxml2.so to resolve
these undefined symbols.
I just ran into this as the Ruby extension shared library could not be
Frank,
What are the changes going in?
Brent
On 9/11/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one of the last minute features I still wanted to get into the M2
release, so people can start to play with it.
Frank.
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2006 06:10:17 PM:
n/m, I see the commit now.
On 9/11/06, Brent Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
What are the changes going in?
Brent
On 9/11/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one of the last minute features I still wanted to get into the M2
release, so people can start to play
Sorry this was a mistake on my part - I didn't mean to check that
file in. Otherwise, I would have mentioned it.
Jim
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I was somewhat surprised by this change as the commit message
provides no indication that an entire module was commented
Thanks Jean-Sebastien. Will watch for that.
On 9/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
This time around I am stuck with passing java object instances to
ruby. I
need this to enable service reference calls from Ruby. I want to be
able
to
49 matches
Mail list logo
