Hi, Venkata.
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:52 AM
Subject: Re: Queries related to Component Property Loading
Hi Jeremy, Raymond,
Hi Jeremy
If no-one else wants to do it, I'm happy to volunteer as Release
Manager for this one.
Cheers
Andy
On 9/25/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re tests... yes we should have a simple to run test suite ... scatest! The
existing scatest is justa MyValue sample with some extras thrown in.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 11:58 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
- After all properties defined in the scdl have been loaded, the
list of
properties in the component type will be checked to see if there
is any
property who 'override' attribute is 'must' and is not defined as
part of
the component
+1
On 9/26/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
+1 from me too
- Venkat
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Ignacio as a committer. He has done a great
deal of work adding non-blocking support into the Java SCA runtime
and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-115?page=comments#action_12437860
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-115:
Hi Raymond. Sorry it has taken so long to get to this. I guess I really am
overworked :-)
After looking
Hows that document coming?
...ant
On 9/19/06, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Ant.
Yes, the code is mostly there and it works for Axis2 binding with Axiom
and
SDO databindings which are plugged into the framework.
FYI, I'm planning to put together a document for the databinding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:26 AM, scabooz wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:47 PM, scabooz wrote:
Sebastien did a good job enumerating the rationale for why the
binding.sca
exists in the specifications. Perhaps your concern is over
Replies in line
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: Why do we need binding.sca?
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:47 PM, scabooz wrote:
Sebastien did a good job enumerating the
I have made a branch for SDO at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-java-M2/which
I thought it might be worth drawing your attention to, since it might
be helpful that we had a common approach across the projects. I think we
are going to want separate branches per
+1 from me
On 26/09/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Ignacio as a committer. He has done a great
deal of work adding non-blocking support into the Java SCA runtime
and is active in the community through things such as list discussions.
Here's my +1.
Jim
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-755?page=all ]
Fuhwei Lwo updated TUSCANY-755:
---
Attachment: AnyTypeTest.java
anytype.xsd
I think the problem is coming from
DataObjectXMLStreamReader.populateProperties() method. The line
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that could be done to evolve the code (It's before
I have had enough coffee so bear with me ;-) ):
1. Some of the exception handling does printStackTrace() and
exceptions derive directly from
Hi all,
I've just checked some code in at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sca/test/ws.service.interop/
that does some interop testing as follows:
- An Axis2 binding.ws service implementation component is deployed
based on the WSDL that Simon put up at
I noticed Context Model.emx was checked into the source tree. Given
doco is a Good Thing, can we have only open formats incorporated
into Javadoc checked into the source tree, such as png since many of
us neanderthals don't use UML tools?
Thanks,
Jim
On 9/26/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just checked some code in at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sca/test/ws.service.interop/
that does some interop testing as follows:
- An Axis2 binding.ws service implementation component is deployed
based
+1
--
Jeremy
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:26 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
I would like to nominate Ignacio as a committer. He has done a
great deal of work adding non-blocking support into the Java SCA
runtime and is active in the community through things such as list
discussions.
Here's my +1.
What endpoint address should it return?
--
Jeremy
On Sep 26, 2006, at 8:09 AM, ant elder (JIRA) wrote:
WS binding returns wsdl with incorrect endpoint from ?wsdl
--
Key: TUSCANY-756
URL:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the feedback I really appreciate it.
Please see my comments inline marked with [RA]
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that could be done to evolve the
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/26/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just checked some code in at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sca/test/ws.service.interop/
that does some interop testing as follows:
- An Axis2 binding.ws service implementation
Jim Marino wrote:
I would like to nominate Ignacio as a committer. He has done a great
deal of work adding non-blocking support into the Java SCA runtime and
is active in the community through things such as list discussions.
Here's my +1.
Jim
I would like to start a RDB DAS User's guide and my first thought is to
begin with some of the content that Luciano has created here:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview
The wiki seems like a good home for user-level documentation since it
can easily evolve with
Pretty much every other WS stack ignores any existing WSDL endpoint for
services so I think (1) may seem odd to people, the WS binding spec also
states - For services, the WSDL document's port/endpoint location URI, and
the uri attribute of the binding are ignored. So (2) seems like the way to
go
Thanks Raymond,
One more detail, how do you run helloworldwsclient, from the command line?
Doing 'mvn' from its directory gives me a failure because I have not
specified a goal. If I say 'mvn install' it builds but it also says there
are no tests to run.
I basically want to be able to
+1
On 9/26/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to start a RDB DAS User's guide and my first thought is to
begin with some of the content that Luciano has created here:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview
The wiki seems like a good home for
Hi All
I have created some jUnit for account services exercising the persistence
layer using DAS. I would also like to extend the jUnit testcases to
instantiate a AccountService instance using SCA...
I know BigBank is having some blocking issues around SCA, would that be
affecting what I
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 26/09/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no-one else wants to do it, I'm happy to volunteer as Release
Manager for this one.
+1
;-)
Great! +1 from me.
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To
Hi,
There is a test case named as helloworld.HelloWorldWSClient under
src/test/java. It's named in such a way that it won't be run by mvn becaue
it requires a WS server.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
How about just newing up the instance and inject/mock its dependencies?
--
Jeremy
On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi All
I have created some jUnit for account services exercising the
persistence
layer using DAS. I would also like to extend the jUnit testcases to
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the feedback I really appreciate it.
Please see my comments inline marked with [RA]
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that could
Jeremy,
We need to bring these threads back together. Mike's comments
further reinforce the concepts.
snip
I'm confused. binding.sca seems like a very different concept to
all other bindings. They all define protocols etc. but binding.sca
does not; they allow interaction with non-SCA
I was considering this more like a 2nd option, as it was going to bypass the
SCA wiring.. but if this is acceptable, it's pretty much what i had as a 1st
pass to exercise the service.
- Luciano
On 9/26/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just newing up the instance and
A user guide is very useful.
I find the following tutorial stype easy to follow and learn from.
http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/ws_use.asp
On 9/26/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 9/26/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to start a RDB DAS
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more portable and should be an option but with JMS
were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with Java
on the receiving end. Also, I think we need to support streaming.
Maybe we could
This is actually one of the goals of the SCA programming models -
having a model that allows users to test their components without
needing to boot a load of container infrastructure.
--
Jeremy
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I was considering this more like a 2nd
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more portable and should be an option but with
JMS were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with
Java on the receiving end. Also, I think
Comment inline.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to ActiveMQ to send a message to a C
or .NET program. I think some commercial
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to ActiveMQ to send a
Ah, so I took the bait. So then the question is what does ActiveMQ do when
it gets a Java serialized message, e.g., an ObjectMessage? It should be able
to handle it, otherwise it would be subsetting the JMS spec.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hello,
BB needs session scope, and I'm seeing following exception:
org.apache.tuscany.spi.component.ScopeNotFoundException: Scope object
factory not registered for scope [SESSION]
org.apache.tuscany.runtime.webapp.ServletLauncherInitException:
Once I sort out the JMS binding I will do an AMQP binding :-)
I need to understand the databinding framework a bit more to sort this out.
Then I can concentrate on getting the test cases done.
Regards,
Rajith.
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM,
I have started the RDB DAS User's Guide here:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview/RDBDAS_Java_User_Guide
I also provided content for the first capability: Basic CRUD.
Any comments appreciated.
Thanks,
--Kevin
Kevin Williams wrote:
I would like to start a RDB
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Once I sort out the JMS binding I will do an AMQP binding :-)
AMQP would be awesome. BTW, maybe you or Carl could mention if it
supports callbacks and conversational id propagation?
Jim
I need to understand the databinding framework a
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sounds good.
On 25/09/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
I've checked in a change to the linux automake for C++ SCA to allow
building
of the extensions to be optional.
I've added --enable-XXX to configure where XXX is php, python,
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ah, so I took the bait. So then the question is what does ActiveMQ
do when it gets a Java serialized message, e.g., an ObjectMessage?
It should be able to handle it, otherwise it would be subsetting
the JMS spec.
I think it delivers
On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Rick wrote:
Thanks Jim for replying. The WebAppRuntimeImpl is not a component
implementation it boots up the sca runtime in a webaap
environment. Seems like chick/egg situation. Maybe I misunderstood.
I'm not
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:01 PM, scabooz wrote:
Jeremy,
We need to bring these threads back together. Mike's comments
further reinforce the concepts.
Agreed. If I can summarize:
* the current need for binding.sca is to support rare cases of
overrides
* most assemblies will not need it
Hi,
We had a chat on IRC brainstorming how JMS binding can leverage the databinding
framework. Please see the transcripts below for more details.
A brief summary:
1) There are two service contracts involved for services or references with JMS
bindings:
a) The service contract from
\
My understanding of the init levels is that it's scope of
influence is for components in a composite.
Yes that's correct and if you have dependencies across modules,
it's not going to help. What we need is for the dependency thingy
Meeraj and Jeremy were working on to resolve out
Andrew Borley wrote:
[snip]
As there was some talk about implementing implementation.python in the
Java codebase, another piece that we probably need is an SCA client
implementation for Python spec, along the lines of the other CI specs
at
Maybe we could also do a AMQP binding too for portability :-)
Will do, however I think it makes sense to work out some of the details
with JMS in the next few days, before we add AMQP
binding so that we can learn for it.
There's no guarantee that there is Java on the far end - JMS is just
On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
\
My understanding of the init levels is that it's scope of
influence is for components in a composite.
Yes that's correct and if you have dependencies across modules,
it's not going to help. What we need is for the dependency thingy
Meeraj
hey all...I'm getting the following build failure and I was wondering if
someone could help out...thanks!!
testTargetWireInvocation(org.apache.tuscany.container.groovy.WireTestCase)
Time
elapsed: 0.047 sec ERROR!
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke method greet() on null object
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-751?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-751:
---
Attachment: NewSdoOverview.zip
Please review by unzip and use a browser to open sdo_index.html;
the overview diagram can be clicked into respective
I've just attached a demo into
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-751
Please review by unzip
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12341763/NewSdoOverview.zip
and use a browser to open sdo_index.html;
the overview diagram can be clicked into respective introduction.
On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Maybe we could also do a AMQP binding too for portability :-)
Will do, however I think it makes sense to work out some of the
details with JMS in the next few days, before we add AMQP
binding so that we can learn for it.
Yea that
Jim Marino wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to
As soon as we come to an agreement on the databinding stuff I will finalize
the JMS binding.
(We had long discussion on irc about it and Raymond posted the chat log)
As soon as Qpid is available we can have a working sample out there.
The prospect of Tuscany C (amqp binding) working with Tuscany
Hi,
How is it going on with policy framework support in Tuscany, is there
any sample app demonstrates it?
Since concrete policies defined in policySet must satisfy the intents
defined in the profile, which one will validate the policy set,
Tuscany core framework, or individual impl/binding?
I'm going to give you the same feedback I got for the DAS pages.
The overview page should not be very overloaded, in your case, I'd recommend
moving the class/object diagram for a secundary page, probably linked from
the SDO Java page.
- Luciano
On 9/26/06, Yang ZHONG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ... seems like a unit test if failing. Not sure how to fix that. But
then if you want to proceed with the build you can simply comment out the
body of the test case and proceed.
- Venkat
On 9/27/06, Jim Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey all...I'm getting the following build failure and
61 matches
Mail list logo
