Re: [C++] Javascript implementation type, was Re: [C++ SCA] Language bindings embedding the runtime

Supporting OO JavaScript sounds like a good idea to me, and I think I also prefer the attribute named 'constructor'. Have you thought about how properties and references will work with OO? Right now in the Java impl I set these in the script global scope, with OO I guess they should be set on the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-689) Add vc7 build for BB sample

Add vc7 build for BB sample --- Key: TUSCANY-689 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-689 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: C++ Build Environment: XP MSVC7 2002

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-690) Optimize JDK WireService

Optimize JDK WireService Key: TUSCANY-690 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-690 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java SCA Core Affects Versions: Java-M2

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-689) Add vc7 build for BB sample

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-689?page=all ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-689: --- Attachment: bbvc7codepatch.txt Also I found that there were two copies of the service.xml file. I settled on the one in the WSAccountClient directory but I had

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-691) Paramater name interface appearc in the code which upsets VC7 2002

Paramater name interface appearc in the code which upsets VC7 2002 Key: TUSCANY-691 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-691 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-691) Paramater name interface appearc in the code which upsets VC7 2002

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-691?page=all ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-691: --- Attachment: scamodelvc7patch.txt Please apply to runtime/core/src/tuscany/sca/model Paramater name interface appearc in the code which upsets VC7 2002

Re: svn commit: r438785: move to ServiceContract/Operation

Hi Jim, I have posted a patch for this in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-690. Please take a look and let me know if I that is what you had in mind ;-). Also let me know what more might need to be done. I have made quite a few changes to classes in the

RE: Async callbacks over ws binding w/Axis2, was Re: Inner composite patch

Hi, I have been following this thread and trying to figure what the requirements are for the asynchronous support according to SAC spec, and how this relates to ws bindings. As far as the Celtix binding is concerned, Celtix supports asynchronous call per JAX-WS spec, i.e., a non-blocking

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-692) PHP Client for BigBank sample

PHP Client for BigBank sample - Key: TUSCANY-692 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-692 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Components: C++ SCA Affects Versions: Cpp-current

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-692) PHP Client for BigBank sample

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-692?page=all ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-692: --- Attachment: phpwsaccountclientpatch.txt please apply to sca/samples/BigBank PHP Client for BigBank sample -

[C++] windows build system

Having just raised a patch to create a VC7 build for BigBank I'm taking a step back and thinking that we need a better position on Windows builds as we have too many variations. In particular I just tried to open the VC7 Calculator sample project and it's not compatible with my oldish verision of

RE: Tuscany war plugin

Jeremy, I have posted the plugin on the JIRA (688). We should also support all the features of the normal war plugin - I assume we can get that just by subclassing it. The plugin executes after the Maven WAR plugin and takes the WAR file as the input and adds the boot and extension libraries

Re: Tuscany war plugin

Thanks Meeraj - I'll take a look this morning (its a long weekend in the US) -- Jeremy On Sep 4, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote: Jeremy, I have posted the plugin on the JIRA (688). We should also support all the features of the normal war plugin - I assume we can get that

Re: [C++] windows build system

The dependence on MSVC struck me as odd for an open source project when I first saw it but I was reluctant to try to alter something that basically works. I don't think going to the Express Edition helps much since we would still be dependent on a Microsoft product - even if it is free. I think

Build break

Building from root I get 5 failures in the javascript project all similar to: testStateless (org.apache.tuscany.container.javascript.function.ScopeTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.227 sec ERROR! java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.init

Re: Build break

FWIW I commented out javascript and get a similar failure in the spring module -- Jeremy On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Building from root I get 5 failures in the javascript project all similar to: testStateless

Re: Build break

I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo plugin). I had to do mvn install mvn clean mvn install to get a full build :( andy At 15:46 04/09/2006, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Building from root I get 5

False alarm: Build break

My bad - I had a uncommitted change to a pom that meant it was getting an old version of a dependency. -- Jeremy On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Andy Piper wrote: I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo

Can't clean before building, was: Build break

On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Andy Piper wrote: I got something similar until I did a clean and then rebuild. Unfortunately clean does not work from scratch (complains about sdo plugin). I had to do mvn install mvn clean mvn install to get a full build :( This is a maven issue because we

Re: [C++] windows build system

The current windows command-line build depends on a copy of MSVC, which users may prefer as it's the official compiler/linker for Windows.. There's also the third option of getting the Eclipse CDT to generate and manage our builds. I have almost no experience with CDT and I've no idea if that

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-693) Add support for properties in Python implementation extension

Add support for properties in Python implementation extension - Key: TUSCANY-693 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-693 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: New Feature

Re: svn commit: r438785: move to ServiceContract/Operation

Cool - thx. Let me know if you have any questions. Jim On Sep 3, 2006, at 10:34 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi Jim, Just to keep you updated.. I have stared on this and have got some code up for this. I am currently working on getting it work. ;-) trying to get around with the ASM

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-688) WAR Maven Plugin for Tuscany

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-688?page=comments#action_12432526 ] Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-688: --- Patch applied - thanks WAR Maven Plugin for Tuscany Key:

Re: Async callbacks over ws binding w/Axis2, was Re: Inner composite patch

On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Liu, Jervis wrote: Hi, I have been following this thread and trying to figure what the requirements are for the asynchronous support according to SAC spec, and how this relates to ws bindings. As far as the Celtix binding is concerned, Celtix supports

Re: svn commit: r438785: move to ServiceContract/Operation

Great. I'll take a look. Jim On Sep 4, 2006, at 2:14 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi Jim, I have posted a patch for this in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-690. Please take a look and let me know if I that is what you had in mind ;-). Also let me know what more might need

Re: Tuscany war plugin

I added a sample that uses this plugin to generate the war. The webapp does not actually use SCA at this point and I am going to work on adding that but I wanted to give a couple of comments first. * I think bootLibs dependencies should also pull in transitive ones (but not ones already on

Re: Spring impl

Hi Jim, I was able to get the sample working with WLS 9.1, so thanks! FYI There appears to be a JRockit annotation bug that prevents it working, but the Sun JVM works fine. At 04:39 04/09/2006, Jim Marino wrote: as locateService(). I'd prefer that the model at this level remain Spring such

Re: [C++] windows build system

Simon Laws wrote: Having just raised a patch to create a VC7 build for BigBank I'm taking a step back and thinking that we need a better position on Windows builds as we have too many variations. In particular I just tried to open the VC7 Calculator sample project and it's not compatible with

Re: [C++] Javascript implementation type, was Re: [C++ SCA] Language bindings embedding the runtime

ant elder wrote: Supporting OO JavaScript sounds like a good idea to me, and I think I also prefer the attribute named 'constructor'. Have you thought about how properties and references will work with OO? Right now in the Java impl I set these in the script global scope, with OO I guess they

Re: Registry proposal, was: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Really appreciate your compliment and thanks a lot for your comments. My comments are below. On 9/3/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Yang, Thanks for your effort on this (the documentation is really impressive too). I have some more comments based on an initial look: - There

Re: Registry proposal, was: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Hi Yang, comments inline. On Sep 4, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Yang ZHONG wrote: 2-1. SPI is not any part of user Programming Model at all, since it's internal, we can change it any way later. I'd prefer before we check something in and use it throughout the code base we sort these issues (SPI,

Databinding transformation

Hi Raymond, I have (finally) added support for the data binding framework to be plugged into the wiring infrastructure. To do this, you can follow these steps: 1. Extend JavaInterfaceProcessorExtension with an implementation that understands service contract annotations and updates