[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-908) CDATA sections are not handled

2006-11-25 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-908?page=all ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-908: --- Attachment: cdata-2-src.txt cdata-2-src.txt The source file changes to take account fo CDATA sections in sequences. Should be applied to src/commonj/sdo but

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-908) CDATA sections are not handled

2006-11-25 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-908?page=all ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-908: --- Attachment: cdata-2-test.txt cdata-2-test.txt The changes to CDATA tests to take account of CDATA sections in sequences. Should be applied to core/test but

[C++] CDATA in sequences

2006-11-25 Thread Simon Laws
My last CDATA fix didn't properly cover the case where CDATA sections occur in sequences. I have created new patches for source and test files to take account of this. I added them to the existing CDATA JIRA ( http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-908). As an aside in making this change I

Re: OSGi-Binding: Generation of Bundles

2006-11-25 Thread Jim Marino
Hi Nicole, Comments below. One general thing is if you have code it is better to submit it as small patches, even if incomplete, than one big patch. That makes our job committing it a little easier and also allows people to comment or get involved early on. So, even if it is still rough,

Testcase refactoring (r479280)

2006-11-25 Thread Jim Marino
FYI, today I went through and cleaned up some of the kernel test cases. Besides eliminating duplicate mock classes, I also substituted EasyMock objects for implementation classes where contracts (and not implementation classes) were being tested. For example, testing of a JavaTargetInvoker