[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1321) The use of include is not SCA 1.0 compliant. It is still using SCA 0.96 style

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500664 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1321: -- The problem appears to be in the assembly-xml module in

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1321) The use of include is not SCA 1.0 compliant. It is still using SCA 0.96 style

The use of include is not SCA 1.0 compliant. It is still using SCA 0.96 style --- Key: TUSCANY-1321 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1321 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation --- Key: TUSCANY-1336 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1336: - Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-0.90 Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1336: - Attachment: CallableReferenceObjectFactory.java Tuscany does not support injecting a

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1467: - Attachment: EJB3Binding.patch The following patch should allow the EJB Binding to work

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514192 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1467: -- The code in question is the binding.ejb project in the class

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1467) EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers

EJB Binding does not support binding to EJB3 servers Key: TUSCANY-1467 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1467 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516094 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1487: -- I am not sure of the best solution to this problem. Possible

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516093 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1487: -- Looking through the code, the flow of events is: 1) My

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1522) @ConversationID injection incorrectly assumes target type is a String

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518687 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1522: -- The problem is with the following code in the visitField()

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation - Key: TUSCANY-1629 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523510 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1629: -- The problem is in the ServiceProcessor class in the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Attachment: ServiceAnnotationUsingClass.patch The attached patch removes the check for

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] Marking as patch available Tuscany does not support

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1629) Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1629: - Attachment: ServiceAnnotationUsingClassTestCaseUpdate.patch Attached a patch for the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

@Destroy method not called for CompositeScope - Key: TUSCANY-1641 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1641 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Java

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1641: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] Have attached patch to fix this issue @Destroy method

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1641) @Destroy method not called for CompositeScope

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1641: - Attachment: DestroyForCompositeScope.patch @Destroy method not called for

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531047 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1819: -- The problem is in the RequestContextImpl class of the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1819: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] A patch is now available for this issue

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back --- Key: TUSCANY-1819 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1819) RequestContext.getCallback() throws NullPointerException when there is no call back

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1819: - Attachment: RequestContextGetCallbackNPE.patch Patch for NullPointerException

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work -- Key: TUSCANY-1823 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyComparisonFix.patch

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyTest_FAILS.patch

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531466 ] mcombell edited comment on TUSCANY-1823 at 10/1/07 3:56 AM: ---

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1834) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when selecting the opeartion to invoke

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1834: - Attachment: JMSInvokeOperationTest.patch JMSInvokeOperation.patch The

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1834) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when selecting the opeartion to invoke

JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when selecting the opeartion to invoke Key: TUSCANY-1834 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1834

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1836) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues

JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues -- Key: TUSCANY-1836 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1836 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1836) JMS Binding does not conform to the specification when creating JMS queues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1836: - Attachment: JMSQueueCreateModes_Tests.patch JMSQueueCreateModes.patch

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533362 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1823: -- I've done some more investigation into this problem and I now

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Attachment: ComponentContextGetProperty_EnableTest.patch

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1823) The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class Key: TUSCANY-1839 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1839 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1839: - Attachment: AbstractPropertyJavaDocAndSpellingFixes.patch Patch to correct spelling

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1839) Minor JavaDoc errors and spelling mistakes in Tuscany AbstractProperty class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1839: - Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.0) Java-SCA-1.0 Minor

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1336) Tuscany does not support injecting a Callable Reference when using the @Callback annotation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1336. -- Resolution: Fixed This issue has already been fixed by SVN check in #568331 See

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array - Key: TUSCANY-1848 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1848 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534572 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1848: -- When a multi-value property is found, the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1848) Tuscany cannot inject a many value Property into an array

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1848: - Attachment: PropertyInjectionIntoArray_iTest.patch

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project - Key: TUSCANY-1855 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1855 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1856) Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base

Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base --- Key: TUSCANY-1856

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1856) Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1856: - Attachment: ConversationIDExtensionPoint.patch The attached patch contains:

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536234 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1860: -- I believe the ability to perform a callback in a separate

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread -- Key: TUSCANY-1860 URL:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1860) Tuscany does not support performing call backs using a separate thread to the original invoking thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1860: - Attachment: CallbackInSeparateThreadITest.patch The attached

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1855) Possible incorrect comparison in SCADomainImpl in the domain-impl project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1855. -- Resolution: Fixed Simon Laws has applied this patch as part of SVN check in 581897

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536159 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1859: -- This problem is caused by the references not being built

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WireFix.patch Exception when using wires to wire Components

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1859: - Attachment: WiresITest.patch WiresITest.patch creates a new wires iTest that wires two

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1859) Exception when using wires to wire Components

Exception when using wires to wire Components - Key: TUSCANY-1859 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1859 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Assembly

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

Tuscany EJB Binding does not work. -- Key: TUSCANY-1883 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA EJB Binding Extension

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1883: - Attachment: binding-ejb_sample.patch binding-ejb.patch Tuscany EJB

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1883) Tuscany EJB Binding does not work.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539161 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1883: -- Raymond, Thanks for applying the main patch. Converting the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542206 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1909: -- I've created a simple addition to the conversations iTest

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542207 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-1909: -- After some investigation, it appears that the problem is

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance Key: TUSCANY-1909 URL:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1909) Conversational Component referring to another Conversational Component always uses the same instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1909: - Attachment: ConversationalWireFix_itest.patch

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1487) Unable to use different application and runtime class loaders for a contribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-1487. -- Resolution: Invalid I'm going to mark this issue as invalid as it is now very old.

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2023) NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one of which does not have a callback

NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one of which does not have a callback - Key: TUSCANY-2023 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2023

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2023) NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one of which does not have a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12563985#action_12563985 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2023: -- NOTE: I am going to submit a fix for

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2023) NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one of which does not have a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2023. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by adding a null check in svn revision 616731 NPE if

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2023) NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one of which does not have a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack reassigned TUSCANY-2023: Assignee: Mark Combellack NPE if callback service has multiple interfaces one

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565399#action_12565399 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2027: -- I've managed to find the problem. It

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack reassigned TUSCANY-2027: Assignee: Mark Combellack Problem using implementation.composite that is

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references Key: TUSCANY-2027 URL:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-2027: - Attachment: recursive2.jar Test case that illustrates the problem Problem using

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565316#action_12565316 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2027: -- Whilst debugging the code, the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565551#action_12565551 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2027: -- SVN commit #618442 fixes the problem

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2027) Problem using implementation.composite that is another implementation.composite with promoted references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2027. -- Resolution: Fixed Nested Composite References now work. Marking as fixed. Problem

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2029) Multiple levels of Nested Composite References do not work as they are using the wrong URI in the binding

Multiple levels of Nested Composite References do not work as they are using the wrong URI in the binding - Key: TUSCANY-2029 URL:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2169) Saxon download does not work when you are not using the default Maven local repository directory

Saxon download does not work when you are not using the default Maven local repository directory Key: TUSCANY-2169 URL:

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2169) Saxon download does not work when you are not using the default Maven local repository directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12583607#action_12583607 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2169: -- There are a few problems: * Maven

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2169) Saxon download does not work when you are not using the default Maven local repository directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2169. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in SVN revision 642939 Saxon download does not work when

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2180) Cannot invoke method on Service that implements multiple @Remotable interfaces with methods of the same name

Cannot invoke method on Service that implements multiple @Remotable interfaces with methods of the same name Key: TUSCANY-2180 URL:

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2180) Cannot invoke method on Service that implements multiple @Remotable interfaces with methods of the same name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584106#action_12584106 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2180: -- I've raised this scenario with the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2185) Compile errors in the HelloWorld Web Service JMS and HelloWorld Service JMS samples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584473#action_12584473 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2185: -- I think the problem is due to

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2185) Compile errors in the HelloWorld Web Service JMS and HelloWorld Service JMS samples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584469#action_12584469 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2185: -- I've noticed that the Continuum

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2185) Compile errors in the HelloWorld Web Service JMS and HelloWorld Service JMS samples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack reassigned TUSCANY-2185: Assignee: Mark Combellack Compile errors in the HelloWorld Web Service JMS and

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2185) Compile errors in the HelloWorld Web Service JMS and HelloWorld Service JMS samples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584538#action_12584538 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2185: -- I've committed fixes for this

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2180) Cannot invoke method on Service that implements multiple @Remotable interfaces with methods of the same name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2180. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix and unit test for this issue committed to the root as SVN

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2190) Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails to build on the Continuum server as it uses port 8080

Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails to build on the Continuum server as it uses port 8080 Key: TUSCANY-2190 URL:

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2190) Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails to build on the Continuum server as it uses port 8080

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584750#action_12584750 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2190: -- I've updated the port number to

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2190) Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails to build on the Continuum server as it uses port 8080

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12584751#action_12584751 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2190: -- If this change works, it will need

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2192) iTest/OneWay has just failed on the Continuum server and has blocked the build on the root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585038#action_12585038 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2192: -- Looking at the code, the key output

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2192) iTest/OneWay has just failed on the Continuum server and has blocked the build on the root

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2192. -- Resolution: Fixed I've improved the way in which the waiting for the @OnwWay methods

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2192) iTest/OneWay has just failed on the Continuum server and has blocked the build on the root

iTest/OneWay has just failed on the Continuum server and has blocked the build on the root -- Key: TUSCANY-2192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2192

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2194) When a @Remotable interface a duplicate operation, it does not list the class name or method in the exception that is thrown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585136#action_12585136 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2194: -- The problem is actually in the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2194) When a @Remotable interface a duplicate operation, it does not list the class name or method in the exception that is thrown

When a @Remotable interface a duplicate operation, it does not list the class name or method in the exception that is thrown Key: TUSCANY-2194

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2194) When a @Remotable interface a duplicate operation, it does not list the class name or method in the exception that is thrown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2194. -- Resolution: Fixed I've updated the text for the the OperationOverloadedException to

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2198) Apache Tuscany SCA OSGi-SCA Integration Tests fail to build on the Continuum build server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585475#action_12585475 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2198: -- This error only occurs ocassionally

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2198) Apache Tuscany SCA OSGi-SCA Integration Tests fail to build on the Continuum build server

Apache Tuscany SCA OSGi-SCA Integration Tests fail to build on the Continuum build server - Key: TUSCANY-2198 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2198

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2198) Apache Tuscany SCA OSGi-SCA Integration Tests fail to build on the Continuum build server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2198. -- Resolution: Fixed I've committed a fix that will wait up to 10 seconds for the

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2208) ComponentContext.createSelfReference() does not create a ServiceReference to the correct Conversation

ComponentContext.createSelfReference() does not create a ServiceReference to the correct Conversation - Key: TUSCANY-2208 URL:

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2029) Multiple levels of Nested Composite References do not work as they are using the wrong URI in the binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack resolved TUSCANY-2029. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in SVN revision 645827. Multiple levels of Nested

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2208) ComponentContext.createSelfReference() does not create a ServiceReference to the correct Conversation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12586723#action_12586723 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2208: -- I've had a look at the code and I

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2208) ComponentContext.createSelfReference() does not create a ServiceReference to the correct Conversation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12586722#action_12586722 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2208: -- I've added two new tests: Validate

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2190) Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails to build on the Continuum server as it uses port 8080

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-2190: - Assignee: (was: Mark Combellack) Apache Tuscany SCA Alert Aggregator Demo fails

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2213) Cannot Serialize and deserailize a CallableReference injected using a @Callback - Is this a valid use case?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587144#action_12587144 ] Mark Combellack commented on TUSCANY-2213: -- I've added an iTest for testing

  1   2   >