rate
30/01/2008 00:24 1,778 GreeterService.java.vm
1 File(s) 1,778 bytes
Total Files Listed:
3 File(s) 5,334 bytes
D:\tuscany-sca-1.1-incubating-src>
On 30/01/2008, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
It's
e part of the build that failed?
On 30/01/2008, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's supposed to generate the following file from GreeterService.java.vm.
D:\tuscany-sca-1.1-incubating-src\itest\databindings\sdogen\target\..\src\main\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\itest\sdodatabin
Original Message -
From: "sebb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on 1.1-RC3a
On 30/01/2008, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The debug log only provides information about the maven plugins. In your
case, a
Hi,
The artifact is available @
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/1.0/.
So it seems to be a intermittent maven issue. Retrying might help.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, J
Hi,
As of today, we can add multiple interceptors to the invocation chain, but
we cannot control their ordering. When more policies are supported, I see a
need to provide some simple ordering mechnisim for interceptors.
SCA invocation may have three stages: reference, service and implementati
n in the
invocation chain. And the Tuscany runtime will determine the ordering of
phases based on these partial order.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Jan 31, 2008 12:03 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As of today, we can add multiple interceptors to the invocation chain,
but
Hi,
(Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Automation+of+itests+in+web+applications).
In our WAR packaging scheme, we package SCA artifacts with Tuscany runtime
jars in a WAR so that it can be deployed to a web cont
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:10 AM
Subject: Distribution structure
I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new
distribution infrastructure at
www.apa
A quick update: I managed to get the automation working with Geronimo 2.0.2
too using the geronimo-maven-plugin. The new pom.xml has been updated at the
wiki page.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Februa
g to see the best way to
include the test cases, that was generated in a separate jar (a second
artifact from a given module), into the web app
BTW, Would you mind committing it so I can start playing with a
end-to-end scenario for the iTests too ?
On Feb 1, 2008 9:41 AM, Raymond Feng <[E
;Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR packaging
Raymond Feng wrote:
A quick update: I managed to get the automation working with Geronimo
2.0.2 too using the geronimo-maven-plugin.
Hi,
What problem did you with maven 2.0.5? I'm running maven 2.0.8 now.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Automate itests for WAR pack
ting platforms we are supporting, right ?
On Feb 3, 2008 2:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 5:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Sorry for the long text, I make it availabe on our WIKI too:
>
>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
Hi,
I think we should further understand what roles the core, binding and
implementation can play to enforce the pass-by-value semantics.
Implementation extension: knows the setting of @AllowsPassByReference, might
know if the implement code would modify the input data and if the output
data
2008 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: Exception->Fault mapping
Raymond Feng wrote:
The binding-specific exception/fault mapping won't be exposed to the
programming model. I was proposing to make the mapping extensible so that
we can support multiple patterns without impacting the SCA application
code.
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Adding phase-based ordering support for invokers/interceptors
in the InvocationChain
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fine sorry i'd misunderstood before, the bit about adjusting the
sample-calculator-webapp to use this had me thinking the intention was to
add this in to all the samples.
...ant
On Feb 4, 2008 5:09 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
The following failure seems to be a bit random. I couldn't reproduce it.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Continuum VMBuild Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:43 PM
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation
P
The e-mail is getting long :-). I just want to add my +1 to these great
ideas. I definitely willing to help in various areas.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Graduation next steps
The bottom of the issue comes from
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-123. Your fix is indeed a
workaround :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: Error building contributio
turns true for the isPassByValueEnforced flag.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Hi,
I th
PM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
Let me try to propose the following fix:
1) Add new interface such as PassByValueProvider (please help me with a
better name) to the SPI.
public interface PassByValueProvider {
/**
I prefer to keep the JIRA notifications on the tuscany-dev list. IMHO, we
developers should pay attensions to issues in addition to adding features
:-). In some projects like Axis2, they seem to use JIRA to drive the
development activities. A simple mail filter can help organize the inbox if
yo
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
I was initially thinking about the int
Hi,
When we run a Tuscany application with binding.ws in the J2SE (w/ embedded
Jetty or Tomcat), the base URI of the service binding is
http://locahost:/. If we package the same artifacts into a WAR and
deploy it to a web container such as Tomcat, the base URI becomes
http://localhost://. The
-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Hi,
My experience is that you need to set the NamespaceContext on the XPath so
that you can map a prefix to the namespace URI. See:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/xml/xpath/XPath.html#setNamespaceContext(javax.xml.namespace.NamespaceContext).
For example, you can associate "sca
As the first step, I fixed the code (r619973) to tolerate the case that
junit is not present on the classpath. Now the webapp samples should be
working as-is now.
How about the following refactoring?
1) Create a new module as "host-webapp-junit" under "modules" folder. (I
think it should be u
Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
One more question:
Do you think if the participants to enforce PBV
Hi,
I don't enough knowledge to cover all of your points, but let me give a try.
See my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Dritschler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:03 PM
Subject: PolicyHanders
I have b
d to do to enable the testing is change
dependency from "host-webapp" to "host-webapp-junit", and this can be
easily accomplished by maven profiles, right ?
I don't like the "clone". If that's the case, why don't we keep it in the
same module (now it alrea
ginal Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r620376 -
/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/host/webapp/WebAppServletHost.java
Hi,
I don'
Hi,
I don't think this is a good fix. The ServletContext.getContextPath() is
introduced for Servlet Spec 2.5 or later. The major/minor version can tell
us if the current ServletContext has getContextPath() method. In Servlet
2.4, the getContextPath() is only available on HttpServletRequest.
Hi,
I think we have two issues here:
1) Generate the WSDL port type from a java interface following the JAX-WS
mapping rules (JSR-181 annotations can be used to customize the WSDL). The
SCA spec chooses JAX-WS to map between remotable java interfaces and WSDLs.
I assume Simon's proposal is fo
Hi,
In the WAR-based Tuscany deployment, the TuscanyServletFilter is responsible
to start/stop the SCADomain. At this moment, most of our itest cases create
the SCADomain using SCADomain.newInstance() during the setup. If we run
itests as a webapp, it ends up with two different domain instance
+1 on what Sebastien described. In fact, the refactored code already works
this way.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany web-apps and jUnit dependencies
Simon Nash
Hi,
Let me explain what I thought in this example: a contribution with two xsds
under the same tns (http://ns1): a.xsd and b.xsd.
When the XSDs are initially processed, we only create a XSDefinition object
to hold the tns and URL of the xsd. The XSD is not fully loaded at this
point. The XSD
Hi,
I'm trying to bring up the itest/jms with Tomcat and Geronimo. There are a
few things in this commit:
1) Add some logic to detect if the ActiveMQ broker is active, if not, then
start a new one. (Try to reuse the ActiveMQ broker from Geronimo)
2) Move the startBroker() from JMSServiceBindi
ge -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Processing multiple WSDLs in the same namespace
hi Ramyond
Comments in line...
Simon
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H
us honest when it comes to fixing the more general case.
Sound OK?
Regards
Simon
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe the best approach is keep the physical artifacts in the list as-is
without aggregation.
+1
And we change the artifact reso
My preference is to keep PassByValue as the prefix for the following
reasons.
1) The invokers implement this interface only for the cases to enforece
pass-by-value for remotable interfaces. Invocations over local interfaces
(pass-by-reference) don't even care about this flag.
2) The allowsPa
n-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
+1 on the proposal.
The interceptor could just return the flag based on its capability
withou
itest/interfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
itest/interfaces/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/s
Raymond Feng wrote:
My preference is to keep PassByValue as the prefix for the following
r
e/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/s
Raymond Feng wrote:
How about something like DataPassingStyle or DataPassingStrategy?
This is not a big issue and I would not seriously -1 any name even if you
just called it the XyzStyle but I'd li
, 2008 11:01 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
My preference is to keep PassByValue as the prefix for the following
reasons.
1) The invokers implement this interface only for the cases to enforece
pass-by-value for remotable interfaces. Invocations
Hi, Simon.
Thank you for investigating the problem.
I debugged a bit more. The following sequence is failing with ActiveMQ
randomly.
1) Send 3 messages to a queue and commit the session
2) receiveNoWait on one of the three messages
I confirmed that 1) (composite-scoped component with @Init)
t/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tus
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Simon.
Are you proposing to have the following?
1) Define a InvokerPropertySet class such as:
public class InvokerPropertySet {
public boolean getAllowsPassB
g/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
itest/interfaces/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/itest/interfaces/
modules/binding-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/tus
Raymond Feng wrote:
The Configurable interface can be optionally implemented by the Invoker
implementation classes. To support multiple p
n/java/org/apache/tus
Raymond Feng wrote:
We could simply use Object as the return value and then cast it to the
type of the property.
The caller code could perform the test as follows:
if(invoker instanceof Configurable) {
boolean allowsPBR = ((Configurable)
invoker).getProperty("Allow
Hi,
You need to register the XSDs with SDO. Please see a similar question/answer
here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28062.html
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:36 AM
Subje
That was my intention to return true as the DTInterceptor will make sure the
data passing is safe.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databin
Hi,
I debugged your test case and it turned out the problem is in your test case.
There is a dangling type reference in helloworld.wsdl:
http://helloworld";
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
It should be: .
After fixing the i
actually caught. In that case, it's usually an error path for which I
would
not expect performance to be an issue. I realise that not all exceptions
represent "hard errors", but I think a ClassCastException does.
Simon
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
> On 20/02/2008, Simon Nash <[EMA
I think there are still issues to be flushed out for the dynamic SDO
support.
Let's first look at the proposal:
1) Create a "Composite"-scoped java component, and in the method with @Init
to call SDO APIs to register the WSDL/XSD with SDO HelperContext.
(This is doable even though it require
-
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding
framework
Raymond Feng wrote:
That was my intention to return true as the DTInterceptor will make sure
the
10:32 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
> That was my intention to return true as the DTInterceptor will make
> sure
> the data passing is safe.
>
Is that always a correct assumption? I thought that it could depend on
the nature of the tra
cany-related necessarily, to make this
determination.
So you're looking for Message to determine if the flag should be true or
false, right?
But once I found out I thought it would be nice to dynamically turn
off PBV copy on the chain.
Scott
On Feb 20, 2008 1:22 PM, Raymond Feng <[EM
Hi,
I'm seeing random failures in itest-callback-multiple-wires. In this itest,
MyServiceComponent is scoped with "COMPOSITE". MyClientComponent1 and
MyClientComponent2 invokes MyServiceComponent concurrently. Since the
MyServiceComponent is the same instance for both clients, the requestConte
Hi,
I checked in a fix under r629688 by adding a "synchronized" for the business
method. Please confirm if it's meant to test that way.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
Some comments:
1) For RPC style, any failures on the service side should produce a fault
JMS response message. The client side will be blocked if there is no
response. Maybe we don't need a JMS property to mandate this behavior.
2) +1 to have a tuscany-defined JMS property to indicate if the
This should be fixed by r629867.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Continuum VMBuild Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:49 AM
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation
Project
Online report :
http://vmbuild.ap
a veto, just expressing an opinion.
...ant
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on Option 1) which is something I'm scared to propose these days as we
want to keep the SPIs binary compatible :-). I prefer to have an explict,
clean and stro
.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: Exception->Fault mapping
Hi,
We had some explanations in the same thread before. Please see it below.
Simply speaking, wh
Hi,
I did some debugging and it turned out that the problem is caused by the
PassByValueInterceptor.copy(). The interface is remotable and Abdera's
object model doesn't conform to the JAXB default Java2WSDL mapping, neither
does it implement java.io.Serializable.
There are a few things we ca
Hi,
I don't want to intercept the discussion but I'm wondering if we should
define the pluggability of the classloading scheme for SCA contributions.
Typically we have the following information for a ready-to-deploy unit:
* The URL of the deploment composite (deployable composite)
* A collect
+1. The more itests, the better :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 5:08 AM
Subject: [TEST] Conversation Lifetime
I would like to add a few iTests for Conversation Lifetime items that
don't seem to
Why don't we use META-INF/definitions.xml? META-INF/services folder is for
the java service provider pattern.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Trouble with aggregating definition
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: PassByValueInterceptor always copying data now?
With the latest trunk code, PassByValueInterceptor seems to alw
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: PassByValueInterceptor always copying data now?
Raymond Feng wrote:
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From:
.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Trouble with aggregating definitions.xml in distro
Raymond Feng wrote:
Why don't we use META-INF/definitions.xml? MET
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Contribution classloading pluggability: was: Re: Classloading
code in core contribution processing
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I don
Hi,
I think Simon's proposal should work as follows instead of passing the
properties to the createInvoker() call.
public interface Invoker {
InvokerProperties getProperties(); // Contribute properties
}
public class InvokerProperties {
public void setAllowsPassByReference(boolean allow
I'm fine with the proposal. In Tuscany SCA Java, we support many
databindings such as JAXB, SDO, XmlBeans and AXIOM. IMHO, SDO is one of the
technology choices to represent data in the SOA environment. Removing SDO
from the sentence will give us more flexibility. I agree that it doesn't
stop us
I'm trying ... will wait for the pages to be saved into the database.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:42 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: Re: Problem with International characters in a
Hi,
Our build has a dependency on javax.xml.ws:jaxws-api:2.1. And we have the
java.net configured as a maven repo in our pom.xml. The build fails randomly
because the same artifact is available at [2] but it has a different pom as
[1]. A bunch of transitive dependencies are missing in [2], such a
Hi,
I created a page with Chinese title and content @
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=77938. And
it works fine so far. So I assume the problem is now fixed.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROT
We could do that if there is no objection. I assume it should be fairly
straightforward.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Kapish Aggarwal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:35 AM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: Spring Framework
Just
It should be fixed by r632098 now.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Continuum VMBuild Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:16 AM
To:
Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation
Project
Online report
Hi,
I got the following exception. It seems that tuscany-node-impl module is
missing in the pom.xml.
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.NodeException:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.SCANodeFactoryImpl
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.SCA
My understanding is that there are two different issues here:
1) Where definitions.xml should be packaged in a SCA contribution?
2) How do we merge multiple definitions.xml when we build the all-in-one
binary distro?
So I assume Sebastien's proposal is for 1) and the maven/shade discussion is
Hi,
This is part of the changes that we move toward using the JAXWS mapping
rules to map remotable java interface to WSDL. The element names are derived
from the java method signature. For example, if we have the following
interface:
public interface MyService {
AddressSDO getAddress(Cust
Hi,
Please vote on one of the following five options to define
allowsPassByReference property for Invokers. You can vote with multiple
choices ordered by your preference.
[1] Add "boolean allowsPassByReference()" to the Invoker interface directly
[2] Add "boolean allowsPassByReference()" to
t;getInvokerProperties()" to the Invoker
interface.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 2:34 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pass-by-value related SPI change
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on one of the following five
Sorry, I meant to say "I don't think casting +1 to a general slogan help
this project much."
Thanks,
Raymond
------
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:55 AM
To: "tuscany-dev&quo
To be honest, I don't know how to vote on this without some context.
IMHO, community and code are key counterparts for an open source project.
Healthy community ensures the decisions are made openly based on technical
merits which in turn lead to good code ultimately. Good code attracts more
u
Frank Budinsky
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
kelvin goodson
Luciano Resende
Mike Edwards
Pete Robbins
Raymond Feng
Simon Laws
Simon Nash
Hi,
We (Apache Tuscany) project uses the Axis2 1.3 Java2WSDL to generate WSDLs
from java interfaces. Now we run into a few issues (please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2059,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2060).
1) Axis2 automatically exclude the following
I wonder if it's too heavy to develop a maven plugin to merge the
definitions.xml file. BTW, I don't like the all-in-one jar too much as it
breaks the modularity and extensibility story.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
Environment: Windows XP SP2, Intel Core 2 CPU, 2.6, 2GB Ram, jdk
1.5.0_10
Reporter: Daniel Stucky
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Attachments: test.zip
I have the following Java Interface that wor
Hi,
I'm wondering what our tuscany-maven-dependency-lister plugin provides over
the maven-dependency-plugin. The following command can give us a nice
dependency tree of a project:
mvn dependency:tree
Thanks,
Raymond
-
To
Hi,
In the 2nd case, the service is exposed using binding.ws. But the reference
uses the binding.sca (without an explicit binding, it's default to
binding.sca). The wiring should complain that the bindings are not
compatible.
Thanks,
Raymond
-
I tried the RC2 and it looks good to me.
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 3:30 AM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate
2)
vice invoker through web service,not directly through
binding.sca.
class="com.primeton.demo.helloworld.HelloWorldImpl" />
interface="http://helloworldsdo#wsdl.interface(HelloWorld)" />
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-03-04,Raymond Feng <
When you deploy the SCA composite with services configured with web service
binding, please make sure tuscany-host-webapp-*.jar (but not
tuscany-host-jetty-*.jar) is packaged in the WEB-INF/lib folder.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Sandeep Raman" <[E
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
[[snip]]
The question then is, what do we want these tools to do? Some thoughts
from
my point of view. This is just my view and others may disagree...
- The runtime J2WSDL should be able to generate WSDL for Java interfaces
for
the Java interface
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:51 AM
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pass-by-value related SPI change
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:34 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm looking into the policy framework code. I found it very strange that we
have some code in the ContributionServiceImpl to modify the composite file
and attach tuscany attributes to the XML document to keep the applicable
policy sets for a given PolicySetAttachPoint. The later is calcula
ependence this brings into
ContributionServiceImpl which is something I anyways planned to clean up
by
moving all of it to CompositeProcessor.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into the policy framework code.
Improving the XQuery component implementation type could be a good
candidate.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:52 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: Tuscany participation at Google Summer
Hi, Zal.
Thank you for contributing documents to Tuscany. It's really great to see you
share ideas/practices in the community. Here are a few things that I suggest:
1) Start to contribute your content to our wiki site. I have created a blank
page as the starting point at
http://cwiki.apache.o
801 - 900 of 2335 matches
Mail list logo
