ado about nothing (Re: WSCOMMONS-131 and options for
Tuscany SCA Java M2 release)
Hi,
I did some further investigations with Ant and here are some observations:
1) maven2 build will pull in axis2 artifacts from maven1 or maven2 repo
randomly. I even see a mixture that the pom is downloaded
?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: Much ado about nothing (Re: WSCOMMONS-131 and options for
Tuscany SCA Java M2 release)
Hi,
I did some further investigations
I'm starting to wonder if the subject line is even more apt than we realize
and we're just assuming this is a significant problem without investigating.
AFAICT the only thing thats happening is what I originally reported - you
see log messages about the AXIOM API SNAPSHOT when using the WS
This is a good set of observations and if we can figure out why this
snapshot is not being used (or even returned despite the dependency
onit) I think we'd be good to go. If we're going to do that though I
think it's important to understand the cause of this behaviour and
not just the
, 2006 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Much ado about nothing (Re: WSCOMMONS-131 and options for
Tuscany SCA Java M2 release)
Folks,
Can't you just use maven's exclusion mechanism:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.0.4/maven-model/maven.html#class_exclusion
to exclude the specific version of axiom and add
Folks,
Can't you just use maven's exclusion mechanism:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.0.4/maven-model/maven.html#class_exclusion
to exclude the specific version of axiom and add a specific dependency
on the new one?
thanks,
dims
On 11/29/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aha! so
Hi,
This is an appealing proposal. I will give a try.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Much ado about nothing (Re: WSCOMMONS-131 and options for
Tuscany
Thanks, Dims.
We will need a new release of Axis2 as well, since the POMs in
Axis2 1.1 point to Axiom 1.2. Will this be available at the
same time as the new release of Axiom?
Simon
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Thanks Jim/Jeremy :)
Please look at the pom's in the svn. the SNAPSHOT jars are
Aha! so there's a catch. We still haven't started the process for a
Axis2 1.1.1. Hoping to do that with a thorough JIRA scrub this week or
early next week. To see what needs to be fixed for a quick 1.1.1
release. Will let you all know when we have some idea.
thanks,
dims
On 11/29/06, Simon Nash
Folks,
Fact #1: WSCOMMONS-131 is fixed in SVN.
Fact #2: We've started a VOTE for releasing Axiom 1.2.1 [1]. Plan is
to do the release this week.
What's the ruckus all about? (Please don't make me all the emails :)
thanks,
dims
[1]
(Please don't make me *READ* all the emails :)
On 11/28/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Fact #1: WSCOMMONS-131 is fixed in SVN.
Fact #2: We've started a VOTE for releasing Axiom 1.2.1 [1]. Plan is
to do the release this week.
What's the ruckus all about? (Please don't
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Fact #1: WSCOMMONS-131 is fixed in SVN.
Fact #2: We've started a VOTE for releasing Axiom 1.2.1 [1]. Plan is
to do the release this week.
What's the ruckus all about? (Please don't make me all the emails :)
Thanks Dims, that's
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Fact #1: WSCOMMONS-131 is fixed in SVN.
Fact #2: We've started a VOTE for releasing Axiom 1.2.1 [1]. Plan is
to do the release this week.
What's the ruckus all about? (Please don't make me all the emails :)
Well, now, nothing :-)
Thanks Jim/Jeremy :)
Please look at the pom's in the svn. the SNAPSHOT jars are here:
http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository/org.apache.ws.commons.axiom/jars/
thanks,
dims
On 11/28/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Fact
14 matches
Mail list logo
