On Jan 17, 2005, at 23:07, Bernard Lebel wrote:
Okay... so if I follow you, a class that has methods not part of
itself, it's not a static class...? So should I understand that a
class that gets inherited methods can be considered OOP?
Not exactly. Basically, object-oriented programming is just
Max Noel wrote:
if you're only using static (class) methods, then your class
can't/needn't be instanciated, and then is nothing more than the
equivalent of a Python module. I think that's what Alan means by
class-oriented programming.
Okay... so if I follow you, a class that has methods not p
On Jan 17, 2005, at 22:41, Bernard Lebel wrote:
Alan Gauld wrote:
In fact
I usually refer to Java as a Class Oriented Programming
rather than Object Oriented.
If you allow me a question
What is the fundamental difference between the two? To me this is not
clear. I thought that a class was ba
Alan Gauld wrote:
In fact
I usually refer to Java as a Class Oriented Programming
rather than Object Oriented.
If you allow me a question
What is the fundamental difference between the two? To me this is not
clear. I thought that a class was basically a programming object with
properties an
