On 2 August 2018 at 13:49, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> Comparing floats for equality can be flakey. Sometimes two floats that
>> should be equal will not compare equal e.g.:
>>
> 0.01 + 0.1 - 0.1 == 0.01
>> False
>
> Do you know if there's a way to
Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 1 August 2018 at 21:38, Roger Lea Scherer wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to get a list of tuples to be a float, a numerator, and a
>> denominator for all the fractions: halves, thirds, fourths etc up to
>> ninths. 1/2 returns the same float as 2/4, 3/6, 4/8. I would like to
On 1 August 2018 at 21:38, Roger Lea Scherer wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get a list of tuples to be a float, a numerator, and a
> denominator for all the fractions: halves, thirds, fourths etc up to
> ninths. 1/2 returns the same float as 2/4, 3/6, 4/8. I would like to keep
> only the 1/2. When I
I'm trying to get a list of tuples to be a float, a numerator, and a
denominator for all the fractions: halves, thirds, fourths etc up to
ninths. 1/2 returns the same float as 2/4, 3/6, 4/8. I would like to keep
only the 1/2. When I try (line 18) to "pop" from the list I get a "TypeError:
integer
I have a list which comprises of simple random arithmetic problems for
teachers to give to their pupils. This list must be a set length (if
the teacher asks for 10 questions, they should get 10 questions), but
should not have any duplicates.
I've seen the use of sets, but this reduces the size of
Adam Cripps wrote:
I have a list which comprises of simple random arithmetic problems for
teachers to give to their pupils. This list must be a set length (if
the teacher asks for 10 questions, they should get 10 questions), but
should not have any duplicates.
I've seen the use of sets, but
On 1/11/07, Adam Cripps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Cripps wrote:
I have a list which comprises of simple random arithmetic problems for
teachers to give to their pupils. This list must be a set length (if
the teacher asks for 10
Adam Cripps wrote:
I've not worked with Sets before but will give it a go. Is there a way
of turning the Set back to a list?
list(mySet)
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Why not sorting the items and throw out all multiples until you reach
the fixed length ?
Klaus Ramelow
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor