Ok, so after making the changes the code does bind the startingPort
variable but that is the only port that gets bound. Also when connecting to
the startingPort I receive the following error:
Please enter starting port: 65520
listening...
...connected!
Traceback (most recent
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens' to
the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep 65530
and the startingPort is not binding.
***Server***
Jons-Mac:Desktop Jon$ python response.py
Please enter starting port: 65530
Jons-Mac:Desktop
On 11/06/14 00:08, Jon Engle wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
This has nothing to do with your immediate problem but...
***Code***
#!/usr/bin/python # This is server.py file
from socket import * #import the socket library
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jon Engle jon.en...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens' to
the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep 65530
and the startingPort is not binding.
The problem is that all threads
Jon Engle wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
to the ports in the loop. I have verified by running netstat -an | grep
65530 and the startingPort is not binding.
As I've already hinted the easiest way to keep your listening threads alive
is to use
Alan Gauld wrote:
On 11/06/14 00:08, Jon Engle wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never 'listens'
This has nothing to do with your immediate problem but...
***Code***
#!/usr/bin/python # This is server.py file
from socket import *
Thank you for your help, this definitely gets me going in the right
direction!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Marc Tompkins marc.tompk...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jon Engle jon.en...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so when I run the code it immediately terminates and never
I am trying to open ports 1025-65535 with the following code (Mostly found
online with small modifications). I am unable to bind anything other than
the one port which is selected as input. What am I missing and how do I
bind all the ports simultaneously?
#!/usr/bin/python # This is
Hi,
fist - are you really triyng to have open 64 000 ports? ok, i suppose
you have your reasons, but this is not a good idea - you'll block most
applications that use these ports ..
The problem is with your main function -
you have PORT defined, but it is not global, it is only local, and
On 10/06/14 00:33, Jon Engle wrote:
I am trying to open ports 1025-65535 with the following code
Why would you want to do that?
It sounds like a great way to cripple your PC as it runs 64000 threads
monitoring each of those ports. And it assumes that nothing else is
using those ports
Lukas Nemec wrote:
Hi,
fist - are you really triyng to have open 64 000 ports? ok, i suppose
you have your reasons, but this is not a good idea - you'll block most
applications that use these ports ..
The problem is with your main function -
you have PORT defined, but it is not global,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Jon Engle jon.en...@gmail.com wrote:
startingPort=input(\nPlease enter starting port: )
startingPort=int(startingPort)
def setup(PORT):
PORT = startingPort#arbitrary port not currently in use
There's a conflict with this PORT
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Jon Engle jon.en...@gmail.com wrote:
for port in range (startingPort, 65535):
thread.start_new_thread(setup, (port,))
startingPort=startingPort+1
#print startingPort
I think you just need this:
for port in range (startingPort, 65535):
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Jon Engle jon.en...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so after making the changes the code does bind the startingPort
variable but that is the only port that gets bound. Also when connecting to
the startingPort I receive the following error:
Please enter starting
14 matches
Mail list logo
