Re: [Tutor] Using the Nimblenet Library in Python 3.6

On 05/04/18 15:28, Zachary Ware wrote: > I would appreciate keeping the FUD about the differences to a minimum > :). The differences are there and they are significant, but far from > insurmountable; in my experience, well-written Python 3 code is fairly > trivial to port to Python 2/3. I

Re: [Tutor] Using the Nimblenet Library in Python 3.6

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote: > On 05/04/18 04:02, Mark Lawrence wrote: > >> Python 3.6 has more functionality than 2.7 by definition, but your >> comment implies, at least to me, that 2.7 and 3.6 are chalk and cheese. >> Nothing could be further

Re: [Tutor] Using the Nimblenet Library in Python 3.6

On 05/04/18 09:39, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote: On 05/04/18 04:02, Mark Lawrence wrote: Python 3.6 has more functionality than 2.7 by definition, but your comment implies, at least to me, that 2.7 and 3.6 are chalk and cheese. Nothing could be further from the truth and has regrettably been one

Re: [Tutor] Using the Nimblenet Library in Python 3.6

On 05/04/18 04:02, Mark Lawrence wrote: > Python 3.6 has more functionality than 2.7 by definition, but your > comment implies, at least to me, that 2.7 and 3.6 are chalk and cheese. > Nothing could be further from the truth and has regrettably been one of > the reasons for the dreadfully slow